Agriculture, Food and the TTIP: Possibilities and Pitfalls. CEPS Special Report No. 99/December 2014. TTIP Series No. 3 and Paper No. 1 in the CEPS-CTR project “TTIP in the balance’’

Progress in agriculture and food issues in the TTIP talks will largely be determined by the level of ambition in the negotiations as a whole. If ambitions are modest, a low-level agreement could probably be reached that includes some limited commitments on agricultural market access and food regulations. These could include promises of mutual support in the area of opening up agricultural markets through the WTO and of further Transatlantic cooperation in trying to resolve conflicts over food regulations. Bolder ambitions would allow more scope for tackling the difficult problems, though at the cost of time. It would be unfortunate if the opportunity were not taken to make some significant progress in removing some longstanding irritants in the area of agricultural policy and food regulations: this is where the economic gains are likely to be significant and the spill-overs useful. This paper argues the case that it is worthwhile making the effort to secure a constructive and imaginative agreement on agriculture and food regulations in the TTIP. A fairly detailed suggestive list of potential sub-deals in agro-food, supported by the analysis in the paper, is the most concrete one of a series of policy conclusions

The state of civil rights; a report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

Mode of access: Internet.

Milliken v. Bradley--the implications for metropolitan desegregation : conference before the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

Prepared by F. B. Routh, E. A. Waldo, and C. L. Hurley."

Opinions and decision in the United States of America on behalf on North American Dredging Company of Texas, claimant, v. the United Mexican States. Docket no. 1223, March 31, 1926.

Mode of access: Internet.

Opinion and decision in the United States of America on behalf of William A. Parker, claimant, v. the United Mexican States. Docket no. 127, March 31, 1926.

Mode of access: Internet.

Opinion and decision in the United States of America on behalf of George W. Hopkins, claimant, v. the United Mexican States. Docket no. 39, March 31, 1926.

Mode of access: Internet.

Opinion and decision in the United States of America on behalf of Illinois Central Railroad Company, Claimant, v. the United Mexican States. Docket no. 432, March 31, 1926.

Mode of access: Internet.

Opinion and decision in the United States of America on behalf of the Home Insurance Company, claimant, v. the United Mexican States. Docket no. 73, March 31, 1926.

Mode of access: Internet.