979 resultados para Public welfare.


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program for January 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs for January 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program - February 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs - February 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program - March 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program - April 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs - April 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs - March 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program - May 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs - May 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

G-1 Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs, June 2007

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The welfare implications of intellectual property protection (IPP) for private sector agricultural research are analyzed, focusing on the realistic cases in which countries provide different IPP levels, technology spills over across countries, and the public sector is involved in research. A model is developed to determine who benefits from, and who should pay for, the associated research. The paper contains some interesting results on the implications of a harmonization of IPP policies through multilateral agreements or via technology that allows research firms to prevent the copying of plants and animals that express traits that have emerged from their research.