966 resultados para Irrigação com déficit hídrico


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

O consumo de águas salinas pelas plantas na maioria dos casos afetam o rendimento das culturas em suas diversas fases prejudicando desenvolvimento e produção. O trabalho avaliou o consumo hídrico da rúcula (Eruca sativa) em sistema hidropônico NFT com águas salinas. Foram analisados seis níveis crescentes de salinidade da água (CEa), quais sejam: 0,2; 1,2; 2,2; 3,2; 4,2 e 5,2 (dS m-1) utilizaram-se duas fontes de sais: águas salobras (AS) e NaCl. Foi determinado o volume evapotranspirado por planta (VETc) no sistema durante o cultivo. O consumo hídrico nos primeiros dias após transplantio foi de 250 mL dia-1 aproximadamente para ambas as testemunhas e decresceram com o aumento da salinidade, a eficiência de utilização da água foi reduzida revelando uma resposta linear decrescente em função da salinidade ocorrendo uma resposta negativa das plantas que apresentaram uma redução na quantidade de folhas de 3,34%.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The objective of this work was to analyze the most appropriate management to achieve higher productivity for carioca beans (phaseolus vulgaris) and pearll cultivar. The research was developed in the Demonstrative and Experimental Area of Irrigation (ADEI) of FCAV/UNESP, Campus of Jaboticabal, SP. Four treatments were used: T1- irrigation with base in ETo estimated by the method of Class A pan; T2- irrigations based on the readings of tensiometers installed at 0,20 m and 0,40 m of depth; T3- irrigations carried out with base in ETo estimated by the method of Penman-Monteith and T4- witness. The results were submitted to analysis of variance. To compare the averages the test Turkey was used at 5% of probability. The treatment T3 had smaller applied water depth than the treatments T1 and T2, and also smaller productivity. The conclusion is that the treatments irrigated with larger frequency showed higher production of grains.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different irrigation managements on flower induction and bloom of coffee trees. The study was carried out at the experimental area of the Engineering Department at Universidade Federal de Lavras, on Acaia Cerrado MG-1474 coffee cultivar, planted 3.0 meters between rows and 0.6 meters between plants and drip irrigated since planting in 1997. The experimental design was randomized blocks with 4 replicates and 5 irrigation treatment: A= non irrigated; B= irrigated throughout the whole year every time the water available was at most 25% of total available water (TAW); C= irrigated during the whole year every time the water available was at most 75% of TAW; D = treatment C during January, February, March, July, October, November and December and treatment B during April, May, June, August and September; E= treatment C during April, May, June, August and September. Each plot was composed of 10 plants and used 2 plants for the evaluation of secondary branches, number of flowers per flowering, number of fruit and fruit set between September and May during the growing seasons of 2006/2007 and 2007/2008. The different irrigation managements did not significantly influence the total number of flowers, number of branches and percentage of flowers that resulted in fruits. Comparing data from two harvests verified the biennial effect in the total number of flowers, percentage of fruit set and branch gain.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía