Is amoxicillin/clavulanic acid sufficient for preemptive antibiotic therapy in type III grade open fractures ?

The risk of infection after type III° open fractures is high (10-50%).Preemptive antibiotic therapy may prevent posttraumatic infection andimprove the outcome. Recommendations about the type and durationof antibiotic vary among the institutions and it remains unclear whethergram-negative bacilli or anaerobs need to be covered. In Europe, themost commonly recommended antibiotic is amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.We retrospectively analyzed microbiology, characteristics and outcomeof patients with open type III° fractures treated at our institution.Methods: Between 01/2005 and 12/2009 we retrospectively includedall type III grade open fractures of the leg at our institution classifiedafter Gustilo into type IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Demographic characteristics,clinical presentation, microbiology, surgical and antibiotic treatmentand patient outcome were recorded using a standardized case-reportform.Results: 30 cases of patients with type III° open fractures wereincluded (25 males, mean age was 40.5 years, range 17-67 years).27 fractures (90%) were located on the lower leg and 3 (10%) on theupper leg. Microbiology at initial surgery was available for 19 cases(63%), of which 10 grew at least one organism (including 8 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid-resistant gram-negative bacilli [GNB], 7 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid-resistant Bacillus cereus), 11 were culture-negative.Preemptive antibiotics were given in all cases (100%) for an averageduration of 8.5 days (range 1-53 days), the most common antibioticwas amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in 60% (n = 18). 11 cases just receivedpreemptive antibiotic treatment, in 19 of 30 cases the antibiotic therapywas changed and prolonged. Microbiology at revision surgery wasavailable for 25 cases and 22 grew at least one pathogen (including32 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid-resistant gram-negative bacilli and 10amoxicillin/clavulanic acid-resistant Bacillus cereus), 3 were culturenegative.Conclusions: At initial surgery, most common isolated organismswere coagulase-negative staphylococci (43%), Bacillus cereus (23%),and gram-negative bacilli (27%), and others (7%) of which 48% wereresistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. At revision surgery, isolatedorganisms were gram-negative bacilli (64%), Bacillus cereus (20%),and others (16%) of which 88% were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanicacid. The spectrum of amoxicillin/clavulanic does not cover the mostcommon isolated organisms.FM32

Parc des Princes, 9/11/19, rugby, équipe de Nantes [battue par le Stade Français] : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 56858

[9/7/19, rond-point des Champs-Élysées, canons allemands entassés pour les préparatifs de la Victoire] : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 54807

[9/7/19, rond-point des Champs-Élysées, canons allemands entassés pour les préparatifs de la Victoire] : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 54808

Départ du [prix] Gondrand [course de relais facultatifs par équipe de trois], Colombes, 9/11/19 : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 56840

Équipe Racing club Bruxelles, 9/11/19, Colombes, prix Gondrand : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 56837

1.° Caii Plinii Secundi epistolarum libri decem : primi initium et decimi finis desiderantur. — 2.° Ejusdem panegyricus Trajano dictus. — 3.° Latini Pacati Drepanii panegyricus Theodosio dictus. — 4.° Claudii Mamertini Juliano Imperatori gratiarum actio de Consulatu suo. — 5.° Nazarii panegyricus Constantino, Caesari, dictus. — 6.° Eumenii gratiarum actio Constantino, Augusto, Flaviensium nomine. — 7.° Ejusdem panegyricus Constantino, Augusto, dictus. — 8.° Incerti authoris panegyricus Maximiano et Constantino dictus. — 9.° Eumenii panegyricus Constantio, Caesari, dictus. — 10.° Ejusdem oratio pro restaurandis scholis. — 11.° Claudii Mamertini panegyricus Maximiano, Augusto, dictus. — 12.° Genethliacus Maximiani : authore eodem. — 13.° Incerti authoris panegyricus Constantino, Augusto, dictus : finis desideratur.

Bigotianus

Microtubule-associated protein-2 immunoreactivity: a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of low-grade neuroepithelial tumors.

Complex and variable morphological phenotypes pose a major challenge to the histopathological classification of neuroepithelial tumors. This applies in particular for low-grade gliomas and glio-neuronal tumors. Recently, we and others have identified microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP2) as an immunohistochemical marker expressed in the majority of glial tumors. Characteristic cell morphologies can be recognized by MAP2 immunoreactivity in different glioma entities, i.e., process sparse oligodendroglial versus densely ramified astrocytic elements. Here, we describe MAP2-immunoreactivity patterns in a large series of various neuroepithelial tumors and related neoplasms (n = 960). Immunohistochemical analysis led to the following conclusions: (1) specific pattern of MAP2-positive tumor cells can be identified in 95% of glial neoplasms; (2) ependymal tumors do not express MAP2 in their rosette-forming cell component; (3) tumors of the pineal gland as well as malignant embryonic tumors are also characterized by abundant MAP2 immunoreactivity; (4) virtually no MAP2 expression can be observed in the neoplastic glial component of glio-neuronal tumors, i.e. gangliogliomas; (5) malignant glial tumor variants (WHO grade III or IV) exhibit different and less specific MAP2 staining patterns compared to their benign counterparts (WHO grade I or II); (6) with the exception of melanomas and small cell lung cancers, MAP2 expression is very rare in metastatic and non-neuroepithelial tumors; (7) glial MAP2 expression was not detected in 56 non-neoplastic lesions. These data point towards MAP2 as valuable diagnostic tool for pattern recognition and differential diagnosis of low-grade neuroepithelial tumors.

Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma.

BACKGROUND The combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes in patients with melanoma by preventing or delaying the onset of resistance observed with BRAF inhibitors alone. This randomized phase 3 study evaluated the combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib. METHODS We randomly assigned 495 patients with previously untreated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma to receive vemurafenib and cobimetinib (combination group) or vemurafenib and placebo (control group). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the combination group and 6.2 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.68; P<0.001). The rate of complete or partial response in the combination group was 68%, as compared with 45% in the control group (P<0.001), including rates of complete response of 10% in the combination group and 4% in the control group. Progression-free survival as assessed by independent review was similar to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Interim analyses of overall survival showed 9-month survival rates of 81% (95% CI, 75 to 87) in the combination group and 73% (95% CI, 65 to 80) in the control group. Vemurafenib and cobimetinib was associated with a nonsignificantly higher incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher, as compared with vemurafenib and placebo (65% vs. 59%), and there was no significant difference in the rate of study-drug discontinuation. The number of secondary cutaneous cancers decreased with the combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS The addition of cobimetinib to vemurafenib was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma, at the cost of some increase in toxicity. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; coBRIM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01689519.).

Dummy run and conformity indices in the ongoing EORTC low-grade glioma trial 22033-26033: First evaluation of quality of radiotherapy planning.

PURPOSE: Early assessment of radiotherapy (RT) quality in the ongoing EORTC trial comparing primary temozolomide versus RT in low-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RT plans provided for dummy cases were evaluated and compared against expert plans. We analysed: (1) tumour and organs-at-risk delineation, (2) geometric and dosimetric characteristics, (3) planning parameters, compliance with dose prescription and Dmax for OAR (4) indices: RTOG conformity index (CI), coverage factor (CF), tissue protection factor (PF); conformity number (CN = PF x CF); dose homogeneity in PTV (U). RESULTS: Forty-one RT plans were evaluated. Only two (5%) centres were requested to repeat CTV-PTV delineations. Three (7%) plans had a significant under-dosage and dose homogeneity in one deviated > 10%. Dose distribution was good with mean values of 1.5, 1, 0.68, and 0.68 (ideal values = 1) for CI, CF, PF, and CN, respectively. CI and CN strongly correlated with PF and they correlated with PTV. Planning with more beams seems to increase PTV(Dmin), improving CF. U correlated with PTV(Dmax). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results of the dummy run procedure indicate that most centres conformed to protocol requirements. To quantify plan quality we recommend systematic calculation of U and either CI or CN, both of which measure the amount of irradiated normal brain tissue.

Petrus de Alvernia, de motibus animalium, de longit. et brev. vite (5v), de morte et vita (7v), de juventute et senecta (9), de respiratione (12).

Pour gardes, fragments de comptes de la ville de Paris en 1365.