Prise en charge par une équipe pluridisciplinaire des patients avec multiples vulnérabilités dans un service d'urgence

Introduction: Les centres d'urgence se trouvent régulièrement confrontés à des patients avec de multiples vulnérabilités médico-sociales qui recourent préférentiellement aux urgences pour y recevoir des soins de bases. Leurs fréquentes consultations contribuent à encombrer les urgences : dans notre service d'urgence entre avril 2008 et mars 2009, une étude ayant pour but de caractériser ces patients a montré que 14 % de l'ensemble des consultations ont été causées par 5 % des patients admis > 4 x/an.Matériel et méthode: Cohorte prospective des patients admis aux urgences et présentant des critères touchant > 3 axes de vulnérabilités sur les 5 axes reconnus habituellement (déterminants somatiques, de santé mentale, comportemental, social, de consommation de soins). Les patients inclus ont été soit signalés par le personnel médico-infirmier des urgences, soit dépistés par une équipe pluridisciplinaire (2 infirmières, 1 assistant social, 1 médecin) durant les jours ouvrables du 1.9.2010 au 14.12.2010.Résultats: 75 patients ont été inclus (65 % d'hommes). La moyenne d'âge était de 43 ans. 59 % étaient des migrants en provenance de : Europe (22 %), Afrique (22 %), Asie (12 %), Amériques du Sud (6 %) et du Nord (1 %). Les vulnérabilités les plus fréquentes étaient: somatiques 76 % (maladies aiguës/chroniques sévères 50 %, mauvaise adhérence thérapeutique 40 %), liées à la santé mentale 65 % (troubles anxieux et dépressifs 54 %), comportementales 80 % (addictions aux substances 73 %), sociales 93 % (absence de domicile fixe 31 %, absence d'assurance-maladie 15 %, barrières linguistiques 24 %, à l'assistance sociale 46 %) et consommation de soins (> 4 visites aux urgences/an 57 %, absence de médecin de premier recours 33 %). La charge de travail moyenne pour orienter ces patients vers des structures de santé primaire était de 3 heures/cas. Les interventions ont été d'évaluer le réseau de soins déjà impliqué (98 %), de réorienter dans le réseau ambulatoire (64 %) ou vers les services sociaux (37 %).Conclusion: Les vulnérabilités multiples sont relativement peu fréquentes dans notre service d'urgence mais leur complexité requiert des ressources qui dépassent ce que peuvent offrir des équipes de soins habituelles aux urgences. Une prise en charge individuelle par une équipe pluridisciplinaire est susceptible de fournir ces ressources et de réorienter ces patients vers des structures ambulatoires adaptées à leurs besoins.

Experimentació amb un receptor software GPS-Galileo d'alta sensibilitat per a entorns interiors

Este proyecto se centra en el análisis de señales GPS, utilizando un receptor software desarrollado con Matlab en un proyecto de investigación para la Agencia Espacial Europea (ESA), llevado a cabo por parte del departamento de Telecomunicaciones e Ingeniería de Sistemas de la ETSE. Este software utiliza técnicas de procesado de señal de alta sensibilidad (HS-GNSS) que permite al usuario determinar su posición en entornos de difícil propagación como puede ser el caso de los escenarios interiores. Los datos experimentales se analizan en función del nivel de multipath que afecta a la señal de cada uno de los satélites, y la degradación que los escenarios interiores provocan en las señales, a causa del mobiliario, paredes, personas, etc. Para analizar los datos experimentales, se ha utilizado una métrica presentada en el congreso internacional EuCAP 2009, con la que es posible caracterizar las señales en función del nivel de multipath.

Giant extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the thigh treated by wide extraarticular resection and reconstruction with a tumor prosthesis

Introduction: Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare soft tissue tumour with a high risk for local recurrence and metastases. While this entity is resistant to radio- or chemo-therapy, wide resection remains the treatment of choice. Case report: A 60 year old man presented to our service with a large mass in his right thigh, slowly evolving over the past 7 years. His main complaint was the volume of his thigh. Imaging showed a 23x13x14 cm tumour in the quadriceps, eroding the cortical bone and with potential contamination of the knee joint. The risk of a pathological fracture was estimated considerable. A CT-guided core-needle biopsy revealed a FNCLCC grade 2 EMC. A thoraco-abdominal CT scan showed multiple pulmonary metastases. Due to the palliative situation with a very slow disease progression, a wide extraarticular resection of the distal femur and reconstruction with a megaprosthesis were performed. Extensive skin necrosis necessitated three revision procedures for débridement and confection of a pediculated lateral gastrocnemius muscle flap. No complementary treatment was possible for the pulmonary metastases. At 18 months follow-up, he walked without crutches, was able to do his activities of daily living. He was painfree and highly satisfied with the result. During the follow-up, slow progression of the pulmonary metastases was noted, which remained asymptomatic. Conclusion: Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is a rare soft tissue tumour, and wide excision remains the treatment of choice. Whenever possible, limb salvage should be proposed to preserve function and quality of life.

Research and teaching: a holy or an unholy alliance?

Much of the self-image of the Western university hangs on the idea that research and teaching are intimately connected. The central axiom here is that research and teaching are mutually supportive of each other. An institution lacking such a set of relationships between research and teaching falls short of what it means to be a university. This set of beliefs raises certain questions: Is it the case that the presence of such a mutually supportive set of relationships between research and teaching is a necessary condition of the fulfilment of the idea of the university? (A conceptual question). And is it true that, in practice today, such a mutually supportive set of relationships between research and teaching characterises universities? (An empirical question). In my talk, I want to explore these matters in a critical vein. I shall suggest that: a) In practice today, such a mutually supportive set of relationships between research and teaching is in jeopardy. Far from supporting each other, very often research and teaching contend against each other. Research and teaching are becoming two separate ideologies, with their own interest structures. b) Historically, the supposed tight link between research and teaching is both of recent origin and far from universally achieved in universities. Institutional separateness between research and teaching is and has been evident, both across institutions and even across departments in the same institution. c) Conceptually, research and teaching are different activities: each is complex and neither is reducible to the other. In theory, therefore, research and teaching may be said to constitute a holy alliance but in practice, we see more of an unholy alliance. If, then, in an ideal world, a positive relationship between research and teaching is still a worthwhile goal, how might it be construed and worked for? Seeing research and teaching as two discrete and unified sets of activity is now inadequate. Much better is a construal of research and teaching as themselves complexes, as intermingling pools of activity helping to form the liquid university that is emerging today. On this view, research and teaching are fluid spaces, ever on the move, taking up new shapes, and themselves dividing and reforming, as the university reworks its own destiny in modern society. On such a perspective, working out a productive relationship between research and teaching is a complex project. This is an alliance that is neither holy nor unholy. It is an uneasy alliance, with temporary accommodations and continuous new possibilities.