958 resultados para Cicerón, Quinto Tulio, 102-43 a.C.
Resumo:
Resumen: Descripción: retrato de busto de César basado en una escultura
Resumo:
Resumen: Descripción: retrato de busto de Sylla basado en una escultura
Resumo:
Inscripción en el lateral derecho: "Magnit Gemmae"
Resumo:
Resumen: Descripción: retrato de busto de C. Mario basado en una escultura
Resumo:
Resumen: Descripción: retrato de busto de Julio César basado en una escultura
Resumo:
Resumen: Descripción: retrato de busto de Pompeyo basado en una escultura
Resumo:
Resumen: Descripción: retrato de perfil hacia la izquierda insertado en un medallón ovalado
Resumo:
After advocating flexibilization of non-standard work contracts for many years, some European and international institutions and several policy makers now indicate the standard employment relationship and its regulation as a cause of segmentation between the labour market of "guaranteed" insiders, employed under permanent contracts with effective protection against unfair dismissal, and the market of the “not-guaranteed” outsiders, working with non-standard contracts. Reforms of employment legislation are therefore being promoted and approved in different countries, allegedly aiming to balance the legal protection afforded to standard and non-standard workers. This article firstly argues that this approach is flawed as it oversimplifies reasons of segmentation as it concentrates on an “insiders-outsiders” discourse that cannot easily be transplanted in continental Europe. After reviewing current legislative changes in Italy, Spain and Portugal, it is then argued that lawmakers are focused on “deregulation” rather than “balancing protection” when approving recent reforms. Finally, the mainstream approach to segmentation and some of its derivative proposals, such as calls to introduce a “single permanent contract”, are called into question, as they seem to neglect the essential role of job protection in underpinning the effectiveness of fundamental and constitutional rights at the workplace.
Resumo:
Cover-title.
Resumo:
Act of February 13, 1925: An act to amend the Judicial code, and to further define the jurisdiction of the Circuit courts of appeals and of the Supreme court, and for other purposes; Act of January 31, 1928: An act in reference to writs of error; Act of April 26, 1928: An act to amend section 2 of an act entitled "An act in reference to writs of error" (12 pages at end) Eighty pages: "Amendments effective Sept. 1, 1932" inserted. (c.1).
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.