Estudio de las prescripciones farmacológicas en niños a nivel de atención primaria: evaluación de los usos off-label o fuera de ficha técnica.

OBJECTIVE to evaluate the prescription profile and to assess the off-label and unlicensed uses of medicines among non-hospitalised pediatric patients. DESIGN cross-sectional study. SETTING pediatric units in two urban health centers and general emergency room (Hospital Materno-Infantil, Málaga). MAIN MEASUREMENTS sociodemographics variables, reasons for consultation and information about therapeutic medications. The classification of prescriptions was established according to information requirements contained in the Summary of Products Characteristics (SPC). RESULTS A total of 388 children were included (a subsample of 105 treated in the emergency room). Four hundred sixty-two prescriptions (involving 74 different active ingredients) were evaluated. Each infant received and average of 1,7 drugs (95% CI: 1,6-1,9). The most prescribed medicines were ibuprofen, paracetamol, amoxicillin-clavulanate and budesonide. The therapeutic group with the greatest variety of drugs was the respiratory group. 27,4% (95% CI: 23,5-31) of prescriptions were off-label and the main cause was different age (60%; 95% CI: 54,1-63), followed by different dose (21,5%; 95% CI: 18-25), different indication (12%; 95% CI: 9,2-15) and different route of administration (7%; 95% CI: 5,4-10). CONCLUSIONS The rate of off-label uses presents intermediate figures. Around one third of the paediatric outpatients in our sample are exposed to at least one off-label or unlicensed prescription. We should, however, point out that such usage is based on scant official, quality information, although it is not necessarily incorrect. Evidence-based medicine should be encouraged to improve drug therapy in children, as well as following the rules on drugs in special situations.

La evaluación de la calidad del aprendizaje en la universidad

El trabajo que se presenta en este artículo tiene como objetivo conocer los criterios y decisiones de los profesores universitarios para evaluar el aprendizaje de los estudiantes, y analizar la incidencia de estos factores en la calidad del aprendizaje. Para ello se ha contado con la colaboración de un grupo de profesores de la Universidad de Girona que nos han proporcionado las demandas de evaluación que formulan a través de los exámenes y las respuestas escritas de los estudiantes a estas demandas. Complementariamente se ha realizado una entrevista a los profesores colaboradores para conocer sus criterios e intenciones al realizar la evaluación. Entre las conclusiones obtenidas de este estudio destacaríamos la relación que se produce entre la tipología de pregunta y la demanda formulada, la diversidad de criterios de evaluación existente y la complejidad que supone evaluar la calidad del aprendizaje

CoDaPack. An Excel and Visual Basic based software of compositional data analysis. Current version and discussion form upcoming versions

In the eighties, John Aitchison (1986) developed a new methodological approach for the statistical analysis of compositional data. This new methodology was implemented in Basic routines grouped under the name CODA and later NEWCODA inMatlab (Aitchison, 1997). After that, several other authors have published extensions to this methodology: Marín-Fernández and others (2000), Barceló-Vidal and others (2001), Pawlowsky-Glahn and Egozcue (2001, 2002) and Egozcue and others (2003). (...)

Evaluación del estado nutricional en pacientes trasplantados renales durante 5 años de seguimiento.

INTRODUCTION: Weight gain and malnutrition after kidney transplantation is common and the resulting overweight and obesity is associated with serious health complications. By contrast, the prevalence of malnutrition in patients with renal transplantation and its impact on the outcome of kidney transplantation is underestimated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional status of renal transplant patients and determine if the five-year follow-up, these patients undergo alterations that suggest nutritional deterioration. METHODS: The sample consisted of 119 renal transplant patients who attended for five years post-transplant consultation. All patients measurements of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides and ferritin (Ft) were performed. and anthropometric measurements were made of weight, height and BMI. Patients were divided into three groups according to GFR Group 1: <60 mL/min, Group 2: 89-60 mL/min Group 3: ≥ 90 mL/min. RESULTS: The weight and BMI tended to decrease in group 3 while increasing in the other groups. A decrease in total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, Triglycerides and Ferritin less pronounced in group 3 occurs. CONCLUSIONS: After five years you can see a significant reduction in nutritional biochemical parameters in general, likewise the nutritional status is closely related, and is directly proportional to the function of the graft.

Comparativa de dues eines de software pel desenvolupament de classificadors d'espectroscòpia de ressonància magnètica nuclear de tumors cerebrals humans

En aquest treball s’ha fet una avaluació comparativa dels resultats que es poden obtenir amb el software SpectraClassifier 1.0 (SC) desenvolupat al nostre grup de recerca, comparant‐lo amb l’SPSS, un programa estadístic informàtic estàndard, en un problema de classificació de tumors cerebrals humans amb dades d’espectroscopia de ressonància magnètica de protó (1H‐ERM). El interès d’aquesta avaluació comparativa radica en la documentació dels resultats obtinguts amb els dos sistemes quan en la correcció dels resultats obtinguts, així com ponderar la versatilitat i usabilitat dels dos paquets de software per a una aplicació concreta d’interès al treball del GABRMN. Per a aquest treball s’han utilitzat dades provinents de dos projecte europeus multicèntrics (INTERPRET i eTumour) en els quals vam participar. Les classes tumorals utilitzades (d’un total de 217 pacients) han sigut les majoritàries des del punt de vista epidemiològic: glioblastoma multiforme, metàstasi, astrocitomes de grau II, ligodendrogliomes de grau II, oligoastrocitomes de grau II i meningiomes de baix grau. Amb les dades d’aquests pacients s’han dissenyat classificadors basats en l’anàlisi discriminant lineal (LDA), s’han avaluat amb diferents mètodes matemàtics i s’han testat amb dades independents. Els resultats han estat satisfactoris, obtenint amb l’SC resultats més robusts amb dades independents respecte la classificació realitzada per l’SPSS.

La Cooperación comercial CE-ACP: Evaluación del Protocolo del Azúcar

A pesar de que estos compromisos comerciales especiales han implicado sustanciales transferencias para algunos países ACP participantes, éstas no han logrado, en general, la expansión del bienestar económico de dichos países. Dan soporte a ello determinados elementos influyentes tanto en el diseño como en la aplicación del Protocolo. En consecuencia, se pretende aportar líneas de mejora de la política europea de cooperación al desarrollo de los países ACP beneficiarios del Protocolo en el ámbito del azúcar, en el marco de la nueva cooperación comercial CE-ACP y la propuesta de reforma de la OCM del azúcar.

Manual para la evaluación del impacto en salud de proyectos sometidos a instrumentos de prevención y control ambiental en Andalucía

Este Manual se complementa con los siguientes documentos de apoyo: 1. Actuaciones y requerimientos (Lista de actuaciones con indicación de los requerimientos que deben cumplir respecto a la EIS); 3. Indicadores (Batería de indicadores y estándares para la evaluación y la relevancia de los impactos); y 4. Análisis en profundidad (Resumen de las etapas de una evaluación de riesgos). Publicado en la página Web de la Consejería de Salud : www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud (Ciudadanía / Nuestra Salud / Evaluación de impacto en salud)

Manual para la evaluación del impacto en salud de los instrumentos de planeamiento urbanístico en Andalucía

Este Manual se complementa con varios documentos de apoyo: 1. Dimensiones y áreas que pueden verse afectadas por el planeamiento urbanístico; 3. Batería de indicadores y estándares para la evaluación de la relevancia de los impactos; y 4. Análisis en profundidad. Publicado en la página Web de la Consejería de Salud: www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud (Ciudadanía / Nuestra Salud / Evaluación de impacto en salud)

Elementos para guiar ações visando à orientação empreendedora em organizações de software

Neste artigo, aborda-se a orientação empreendedora (OE) em organizações de software. Tem-se por objetivo propor um conjunto consolidado de elementos que possibilitem guiar ações visando à orientação empreendedora em organizações de software. Para tanto, realizou-se pesquisa de natureza exploratória, com o uso de dados qualitativos. A coleta de dados foi feita por meio de entrevistas em profundidade com executivos de 13 organizações com o intuito de realizar um levantamento de práticas efetivas de orientação empreendedora, para compreensão desse comportamento nas organizações e confirmação dos elementos da base conceitual de orientação empreendedora adotada no estudo. Como resultado, apresenta-se um conjunto de elementos da orientação empreendedora, consolidado a partir da literatura e da prática efetiva das organizações, que constitui importante referência para guiar ações visando à orientação empreendedora em organizações de software. O estudo conclui com o enriquecimento e o detalhamento da base conceitual de orientação empreendedora, com a proposição de categorias, agregação de novos elementos decorrentes da prática organizacional e a consolidação do conjunto de elementos, oferecendo subsídios às organizações de software que desejem desenvolver esse comportamento.

The appropriateness of renal angioplasty: the ANPARIA software: a multidisciplinary expert panel approach

Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) is an invasive technique that is costly and involves the risk of complications and renal failure. The ability of PTRA to reduce the administration of antihypertensive drugs has been demonstrated. A potentially greater benefit, which nevertheless remains to be proven, is the deferral of the need for chronic dialysis. The aim of the study (ANPARIA) was to assess the appropriateness of PTRA to impact on the evolution of renal function. A standardized expert panel method was used to assess the appropriateness of medical treatment alone or medical treatment with revascularization in various clinical situations. The choice of revascularization by either PTRA or surgery was examined for each clinical situation. Analysis was based on a detailed literature review and on systematically elicited expert opinion, which were obtained during a two-round modified Delphi process. The study provides detailed responses on the appropriateness of PTRA for 1848 distinct clinical scenarios. Depending on the major clinical presentation, appropriateness of revascularization varied from 32% to 75% for individual scenarios (overal 48%). Uncertainty as to revascularization was 41% overall. When revascularization was appropriate, PTRA was favored over surgery in 94% of the scenarios, except in certain cases of aortic atheroma where sugery was the preferred choice. Kidney size [7 cm, absence of coexisting disease, acute renal failure, a high degree of stenosis (C70%), and absence of multiple arteries were identified as predictive variables of favorable appropriateness ratings. Situations such as cardiac failure with pulmonary edema or acute thrombosis of the renal artery were defined as indications for PTRA. This study identified clinical situations in which PTRA or surgery are appropriate for renal artery disease. We built a decision tree which can be used via Internet: the ANPARIA software (http://www.chu-clermontferrand.fr/anparia/). In numerous clinical situations uncertainty remains as to whether PTRA prevents deterioration of renal function.

Cuestiones controvertidas en evaluación económica (I): perspectiva y costes de intervenciones sanitarias.

Economic evaluation of health care interventions has experienced a strong growth over the past decade and is increasingly present as a support tool in the decisions making process on public funding of health services and pricing in European countries. A necessary element using them is that agents that perform economic evaluations have minimum rules with agreement on methodological aspects. Although there are methodological issues in which there is a high degree of consensus, there are others in which there is no such degree of agreement being closest to the normative field or have experienced significant methodological advances in recent years. In this first article of a series of three, we will discuss on the perspective of analysis and assessment of costs in economic evaluation of health interventions using the technique Metaplan. Finally, research lines are proposed to overcome the identified discrepancies.

Institucionalización de la evaluación del impacto en la salud en Andalucía.

Health impact assessment (HIA) aims to incorporate people's health and wellbeing as a key feature in policy-making. Many authors believe that HIA might be systematically integrated into all decision-making processes as a way to achieve that goal. To that end, there is need to overcome a number of challenges, including the fact that Andalusia (Spain) has made HIA compulsory by law, the need for awareness of all public sectors whose decisions might have substantial impacts on health and for a methodology that would enable a comprehensive approach to health determinants and inequalities, and the training of both the public health staff and professional sectors responsible for its application. In Andalusia, a law provides mandatory and binding health impact reports for most authorisation procedures in different areas: from sectoral plans to urban planning schemes, and especially projects subject to environmental assessment. Implementation of this law has required its integration into authorisation procedures, the training of interdisciplinary working groups in public health, the preparation of technical guidelines, and the organisation of dissemination and training seminars for developers.

Cuestiones controvertidas en evaluación económica (II): medidas de resultado en salud de las intervenciones sanitarias

In this second article of a series of three, we will discuss using the Metaplan technique on controversial issues of health outcomes in economic evaluation of health care interventions. The four-discussion areas focus on: choice of health outcomes measures, where any outcome measure is superior to another; extrapolation and transferability of health outcomes measures, which should not be assumed the results of an EEIS of one country to another without making certain adjustments; appropriate instruments to measure quality of life in Spain, where the EQ-5D was indicated as convenient due to its widespread international use; and, indirect comparisons, where the combination of both comparisons, direct and indirect, it would be advisable if the test for indirect estimates is consistent and has been validated. Finally, research lines to try to overcome the identified discrepancies were identified in each of these areas, some of those are: doing studies of correlation between scores of specific and generic instruments measuring quality of life; update or create a database of economic evaluations in Spain; estimating utilities for the Spanish population by existing generic and specific instruments; or, establish a common way to show the results of a meta-analysis network.

El acogimiento en familia ajena en España: una evaluación de la práctica y sus resultados

El acogimiento familiar ha de ser la medida prioritaria para los casos de menores que deben ser separados de su família por motivos de protección. En España es una alternativa que cuenta tan sólo con veinte años de existencia y hasta la fecha no existen prácticamente datos acerca del grado de su implantación y sus características cuando se trata de acogimiento en familia ajena, mientras que son varios los trabajos que han estudiado el acogimiento en familia extensa. Este artículo presenta por primera vez en la literatura científica los datos más relevantes que permiten caracterizar la práctica del acogimiento en familia ajena en España, mediante el estudio de una muestra de seis comunidades autónomas bienrepresentativas, con un total de 357 casos. El artículo presenta los perfiles de los niños, las familias biológicas y acogedoras,el proceso y algunos resultados sobre una submuestra de casos cerrados (n = 179). Se analizarán algunas característicasespecialmente importantes como la larga estancia y la estabilidad de estos acogimientos, que los diferencia de los realizados en otros países

Cuestiones controvertidas en evaluación económica (III). Intervenciones sanitarias en tres situaciones especiales: enfermedades raras, tratamientos al final de la vida y externalidades en las evaluaciones.

The development of the economic evaluation of health care interventions has become a support tool in making decisions on pricing and reimbursement of new health interventions. The increasingly extensive application of these techniques has led to the identification of particular situations in which, for various reasons, it may be reasonable to take into account special considerations when applying the general principles of economic evaluation. In this article, which closes a series of three, we will discuss, using the Metaplan technique, about the economic evaluation of health interventions in special situations such as rare diseases and end of life treatments, as well as consideration of externalities in assessments, finally pointing out some research areas to solve the main problems identified in these fields.