Purging e alte dosi di chemioterapia con reinfusione di cellule staminali autologhe in linfomi non Hodgkin follicolari resistenti/refrattari

In the era of monoclonal antibodies the role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the management of follicular lymphoma (FL) is still debated. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of myeloablative therapy with rescue of purged or unpurged harvests in FL pts. At our institution form 1997 to 2007 28 pts with refractory/resistant FL were eligible for ASCT. Before high dose therapy they received 2-3 cycles of CHOP-like regimen (ACOD), followed by Cyclophosphamide 4g/mq to mobilize the stem cells (SC). After SC collection the pts underwent 3 cycles of subcutaneous Cladribine at a daily dose of 0,14-0,10 mg/Kg for Day 1-5 every 3-4 weeks. The conditioning regimen was based on Mitoxantrone 60mg/mq + Melphalan 180 mg/mq, followed by SC re-infusion 24-hours later and G-CSF starting 24 hours after re-infusion. In 19 pts the SC underwent purging: in 10 harvests the CD34+ were selected by immunomagnetic beads, while in the other 9 pts, only Rituximab was used as “purging in vivo” agent. The remaining 9 pts received unpurged SC. Before ASCT 11 pts were in complete response (CR), 9 in partial response (PR) and 2 in stable disease. Two pts were not eligible for ASCT because of progressive disease (PD). The remaining 25 pts were eligible for ASCT. The engraftment was at a median of 11 days for leucocytes and 14 days for platelets (>20.000/mmc), with a delay of one day in the pts, who received purged SC. Grade 3-4 mucositis was described in 8 pts. During aplasia a 48% infection rate was reported, without differences between pts with purged or unpurged SC. One patient in CR presented myelodysplastic syndrome at 18 months from ASCT. After ASCT 22 pts were in CR, 2 in PR and one patient were not valuable, because died before response assessment. Nine pts in CR showed PD at a median time of 14 months from ASCT. With a median follow up of 5 years (range 2 months -10 years), 22 pts are alive and 11 (44%) in CR. Ten pts died, 5 for progressive disease and 5 for treatment-related causes; in particular 7 of them received in-vitro purged SC. Conclusions: Our chemotherapy regimen, which included the purine analogue Cladribine in the induction phase, seems safe and feasible. The high rate of CR reported and the sustained freedom from progression up to now, makes such modality of treatment a valid option principally in relapsing FL patients. In our experience, the addition of a monoclonal antibody as part of treatment confirms its role “in vivo purging” without observing an increased incidence of infection.

Il trapianto di midollo osseo aploidentico nelle patologie oncoematologiche: studio clinico

L’argomento della presente tesi di dottorato riguarda lo studio clinico del trapianto di cellule staminali emopoietiche aploidentiche nelle patologie oncoematologiche. Nel periodo di tempo compreso tra 1/12/2005 ed il 30/10/2007 sono stati arruolati 10 pazienti (6 LAM, 3 LAL, 1 LMC in crisi blastica mieloide) nell’ambito di uno studio clinico che prevedeva il trapianto di midollo osseo aploidentico per pazienti affetti da patologia oncoematologica in prima o successiva recidiva, per i quali non fosse disponibile un donatore di midollo osseo consanguineo o da banca. Lo schema di condizionamento al trapianto di midollo osseo utilizzato era il seguente: Fludarabina 150/m2, Busulfano orale 14mg/kg, Tiothepa 10mg/kg e Ciclofosfamide 160mg/kg. Per la profilassi della malattia da trapianto contro l’ospite è stata somministrata timoglobulina antilinfocitaria (ATG) al dosaggio complessivo di 12.5 mg/kg, short course metotrexate (+1, +3 e +11), cortisone e ciclosporina con tapering precoce al + 60. I pazienti hanno reinfuso una megadose di cellule CD34+ mediana pari a 12.8x106/kg. Tre pazienti non sono valutabili per l’attecchimento a causa di rigetto (1/3) o morte precoce (2/3). Sette pazienti sono valutabili per l’attecchimento; per questi pazienti il tempo mediano a 500 PMN/mmc e a 20 x 109/l piastrine è stato rispettivamente di 17 e 20 giorni. Quattro pazienti su 7 hanno svillupato una Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) acuta di grado II-IV, mentre soltanto 1/7 ha sviluppato una GVHD cronica. Sette pazienti su 10 trapiantati hanno ottenuto una remissione completa successivamente al trapianto. Di questi, attualmente 2 pazienti sono vivi in remissione completa, mentre gli altri 5 sono ricaduti e successivamente deceduti. In conclusione, il trapianto aploidentico è una procedura fattibile ed efficace. Tale procedura è in grado di garantire un 20% di lungo sopravviventi in un setting di pazienti a prognosi estremamente infausta.