Transition from pediatric to adult health care: expectations of adolescents with chronic disorders and their parents.

The aim of this study was to assess the expectations of adolescents with chronic disorders with regard to transition from pediatric to adult health care and to compare them with the expectations of their parents. A cross-sectional study was carried out including 283 adolescents with chronic disorders, aged 14-25 years (median age, 16.0 years), and not yet transferred to adult health care, and their 318 parents from two university children's hospitals. The majority of adolescents and parents (64%/70%) perceived the ages of 18-19 years and older as the best time to transfer to adult health care. Chronological age and feeling too old to see a pediatrician were reported as the most important decision factors for the transfer while the severity of the disease was not considered important. The most relevant barriers were feeling at ease with the pediatrician (45%/38%), anxiety (20%/24%), and lack of information about the adult specialist and health care (18%/27%). Of the 51% of adolescents with whom the pediatric specialist had spoken about the transfer, 53% of adolescents and 69% of parents preferred a joint transfer meeting with the pediatric and adult specialist, and 24% of these adolescents declared that their health professional had offered this option. In summary, the age preference for adolescents with chronic disorders and their parents to transfer to adult health care was higher than the upper age limits for admission to pediatric health care in many European countries. Anxiety and a lack of information of both adolescents and their parents were among the most important barriers for a smooth and timely transfer according to adolescents and parents.

Improving Transition Outcomes: Resource Mapping Workshop: Parents Survey

Parents survey tool from the Improving Transition Outcomes Resource Mapping Workshops

L'apport du patient simulé dans l'apprentissage de la relation médecin-malade: résultats d'une évaluation préliminaire

Contexte : Les étudiants de 4° année des études de médecine à la faculté de biologie et de médecine de Lausanne bénéficient d'un enseignement des habiletés à la communication médecin-malade, ayant recours à un patient simulé joué par un comédien. But : Évaluer la pertinence de cette méthode active dans l'optique de renforcer cet enseignement dans le curriculum. Méthodes : Un questionnaire demande aux étudiants d'apprécier leurs apprentissages, ainsi que le dispositif d'enseignement. Un autre questionnaire évalue les compétences de l'étudiant qui mène l'entretien par l'étudiant lui-même (étudiant actif), par les étudiants observateurs, par l'enseignant et par le patient simulé. Résultats : Ce dispositif d'enseignement est apprécié des étudiants et permet aux étudiants qui ont mené l'entretien et aux étudiants observateurs d'en tirer un bénéfice. Les étudiants actifs ont tendance à évaluer leurs compétences d'entretien plus négativement que ne le font l'enseignant, le comédien et les étudiants observateurs .Conclusion : Ce dispositif d'enseignement est perçu comme pertinent par l'ensemble des participants, mais devrait être renforcé pour donner à chaque étudiant l'occasion de participer activement à l'entrevue simulée. -- Context: 4th year medicine students at the Faculty of Biology and Medicine of Lausanne were taught to develop patient-doctor communication skills, using a simulated patient played by an actor. Objective: To assess the relevance of this active method in the perspective of reinforcing this teaching approach in the curriculum. Method: This new form of teaching was assessed by questionnaires filled by all participants, i.e. students involved in the communication (active student), students who were bystanders (observer students), the tutor, as well as the actor. Results: This teaching approach was appreciated from all students, active and observer, allowing them to gain benefit from the interview on communication skills acquirement. The active students assessed their communication skills more negatively than did the teacher, the actor and the observer students. Conclusion: This teaching method seems to be relevant for all participants and should be reinforced to give the opportunity for each student to participate as an active student.

The place preference task: a new tool for studying the relation between behavior and place cell activity in rats

This study describes a task that combines random searching with goal directed navigation. The testing was conducted on a circular elevated open field (80 cm in diameter), with an unmarked target area (20 cm in diameter) in the center of 1 of the 4 quadrants. Whenever the rat entered the target area, the computerized tracking system released a pellet to a random point on the open field. Rats were able to learn the task under light and in total darkness, and on a stable or a rotating arena. Visual information was important in light, but idiothetic information became crucial in darkness. Learning of a new position was quicker under light than in total darkness on a rotating arena. The place preference task should make it possible to study place cells (PCs) when the rats use an allothetic (room frame) or idiothetic (arena frame) representation of space and to compare the behavioral response with the PCs' activity.