Qerôvēṣ : doś iz ... Qōl rinnā w-îšûaʿ be-ōhōlê ṣaddîqîm ; doś iz ṭaiṭš main šṭim gizang un hilf gitzelṭ fun tzadikim ...

Übers. d. Hauptsacht.: Hymnen. Die Stimme der Freude und Erlösung

Qerôvēṣ : doś iz ... Qōl rinnā w-îšûaʿ be-ohôlê ṣaddîqîm ... wol ferṭaiṭš ...

Übers. d. Hauptsacht.: Hymnen. Die Stimme der Freude und Erlösung

Qerôvēṣ : doś iz ... Qōl rinnā w-îšûaʿ be-ohôlê ṣaddîqîm ; doś iz ṭaiṭš šṭim gizang un heltz in gtzelṭ fun tzadikim ...

Übers. d. Hauptsacht.: Hymnen. Die Stimme der Freude und Erlösung

Sēfer talmîd ṣaḥqān mûsārî : ... ḥibbûr qāṭān ... mē-haw-wikkûaḥ še-hāyā bên 2 talmîdîm ôhāvîm we-rāʿîm mē-ḥāmat haṣ-ṣāḥôq ... ʿim marʿê māqôm mit-Tôrā nevîʿîm û-Ktûvîm û-min-hat-Talmûd... der gilernṭi und bikerṭi špilr ...

[Jehuda Arje aus Modena]

Sēfer Naḥalat Ṣevî : divrê mûsār mē-haz-zôhār haq-qādôš han-niglôt hap-pešûṭîm bi-lšôn aškenaz ...

hôṣî'ô le-'ôrā ... Hirš Ben- ... Yeraḥmî'ēl miq-Qraqa

Sēfer Naḥalat Ṣevî : divrê mûsār mē-haz-zôhār haq-qādôš han-niglôt hap-pešûtîm bi-lšôn aškenaz ...

hôṣî'ô le-'ôrā ... Hirš Ben- ... Yeraḥmî'ēl miq-Qraqa Ben-

Tefillat yôm kippûr qāṭān : bi-lšôn aškenaz .. ḥibbûr hap-pērûš siqqûrîm ṭaiṭš

... Nātān de q"q Prostiṣ

Taqqānôt : haq-qehillā de-qāhāl qōdeš aškenazzîm ašer be-Amśṭrdm ...

Digitalisat der Ausg. Amśṭrdm, 1736/37

Mišlê : ʿim bēʿûr we-targûm aškenazzî ka-ašēr nidpas be-q"q Berlinû-ve-Win ... nidpas gam pērûš Raši

Digitalisat der Ausg. Ofenbak, 1825/26

Sēfer maḥanē Yiśrā'ēl : enṭhalṭend dînê melîḥā, ḥallā, nēde, hadlāqā

heroizgegeben fon Ber Frenq

Sēfer šaʿar Šimʿôn : hōʿotāq mis-sēfer ha-ḥayyîm ... le-Šimʿôn Franqfurṭ

Mōše Franqfurṭ

Sēfer Hilkôt šeḥîṭā û-vedîqā in daiṭšer šprache : nach sefer Môrē le-zôveḥîm fon ... Yiṣḥāq Dōv hal-Lēwî...

heroisgegeben fon ... Zalman Bamberger ...

Sēfer Ḥōq le-Yiśrā'ēl : hû 613 miṣwôt Mōše ... hā-Rambam we-hā-Ramban ... meʿûttāq û-metûrgām ... li-lešôn aškenazzî bi-lešôn ham-medûbbār ... 613 israelitische Gebote aus der heiligen Schrift mit talmudistischen Erklärungen ...

übers. von J.E.L.

Tôledôt haś-śar Dôn Yiṣḥāq Avarvenel : kedê jeder zol feršṭehen hoben wir dos meʿattîq gewen oif ivri ṭaiṭš

Digitalisat der Ausg. Tarnow, 1900

Blind intubation of anaesthetised children with supraglottic airway devices AmbuAura-i and Air-Q cannot be recommended: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Paediatric supraglottic airway devices AmbuAura-i and Air-Q were designed as conduits for tracheal intubation. Although fibreoptic-guided intubation has proved successful, blind intubation as a rescue technique has never been evaluated. OBJECTIVE Evaluation of blind intubation through AmbuAura-i and Air-Q. On the basis of fibreoptic view data, we hypothesised that the success rate with the AmbuAura-i would be higher than with the Air-Q. DESIGN A prospective, randomised controlled trial with institutional review board (IRB) approval and written informed consent. SETTING University Childrens' Hospital; September 2012 to July 2014. PATIENTS Eighty children, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III, weight 5 to 50 kg. INTERVENTIONS Tracheal intubation was performed through the randomised device with the tip of a fibrescope placed inside and proximal to the tip of the tracheal tube. This permitted sight of tube advancement, but without fibreoptic guidance (visualised blind intubation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was successfully visualised blind intubation; secondary outcomes included supraglottic airway device success, insertion times, airway leak pressure, fibreoptic view and adverse events. RESULTS Personal data did not differ between groups. In contrast to our hypothesis, blind intubation was possible in 15% with the Air-Q and in 3% with the AmbuAura-i [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6 to 31 vs. 0 to 13%; P = 0.057]. First attempt supraglottic airway device insertion success rates were 95% (Air-Q) and 100% (AmbuAura-i; 95% CI 83 to 99 vs. 91 to 100; P = 0.49). Median leak pressures were 18 cmH2O (Air-Q) and 17 cmH2O [AmbuAura-i; interquartile range (IQR) 14 to 18 vs. 14 to 19 cmH2O; P = 0.66]. Air-Q insertion was slower (27 vs. 19 s, P < 0.001). There was no difference in fibreoptic view, or adverse events (P > 0.05). In one child (Air-Q size 1.5, tube size 3.5), the tube dislocated during device removal. CONCLUSION Ventilation with both devices is reliable, but success of blind intubation is unacceptably low and cannot be recommended for elective or rescue purposes. If intubation through a paediatric supraglottic airway device is desired, we suggest that fibreoptic guidance is used. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01692522.