925 resultados para Program interventions


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly report from the Iowa Department of Human Services on Supplemental Security Income Program (SSI).

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The Food Assistance Monthly Participation Report is a monthly summary of Food Assistance program participation, Statewide and for each Iowa county. Breakouts are reported for participants also in the FIP program, those only receiving Food Assistance, and those that are receiving economic assistance under other programs (primarily Medicaid). This report may also be known as the F-1 Report.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Highway Safety Evaluation Report for the Governor's Traffic Safety Bureau, Iowa Department of Public Safety

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Highway Safety Evaluation Report for the Governor's Traffic Safety Bureau, Iowa Department of Public Safety

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Report

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly report from the Iowa Department of Human Services on income.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A Review of the Educational Excellence Program for Fiscal Years 1999 - 2002 and the Student Achievement and Teacher Quality Program for Fiscal Year 2002 within the Department of Education

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly report from Iowa Department of Human Services on income.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The Food Assistance Monthly Participation Report is a monthly summary of Food Assistance program participation, Statewide and for each Iowa county. Breakouts are reported for participants also in the FIP program, those only receiving Food Assistance, and those that are receiving economic assistance under other programs (primarily Medicaid). This report may also be known as the F-1 Report.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Recommendations on preventive services rarely mention how to apply them to older people. Even though general criteria (prevalence of disease, quality of screening tests) that influence screening's efficacy remain important, appropriateness of screening in older persons depends much more on individual criteria, such as comorbidity, functional status, and life expectancy. More than with any other age group, patients preferences regarding future investigation and treatment guide the clinical decision. This article focuses on primary and secondary prevention, and discusses specific criteria to consider in each patient. A table summarizes the appropriate recommendations.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND: Control of blood pressure (BP) remains a major challenge in primary care. Innovative interventions to improve BP control are therefore needed. By updating and combining data from 2 previous systematic reviews, we assess the effect of pharmacist interventions on BP and identify potential determinants of heterogeneity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of pharmacist interventions on BP among outpatients with or without diabetes were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. Weighted mean differences in BP were estimated using random effect models. Prediction intervals (PI) were computed to better express uncertainties in the effect estimates. Thirty-nine RCTs were included with 14 224 patients. Pharmacist interventions mainly included patient education, feedback to physician, and medication management. Compared with usual care, pharmacist interventions showed greater reduction in systolic BP (-7.6 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.0 to -6.3; I(2)=67%) and diastolic BP (-3.9 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.1 to -2.8; I(2)=83%). The 95% PI ranged from -13.9 to -1.4 mm Hg for systolic BP and from -9.9 to +2.0 mm Hg for diastolic BP. The effect tended to be larger if the intervention was led by the pharmacist and was done at least monthly. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist interventions - alone or in collaboration with other healthcare professionals - improved BP management. Nevertheless, pharmacist interventions had differential effects on BP, from very large to modest or no effect; and determinants of heterogeneity could not be identified. Determining the most efficient, cost-effective, and least time-consuming intervention should be addressed with further research.