890 resultados para 180104 Civil Law and Procedure


1. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, and the other regulations applicable to them with regard to the establishment of renumeration, pensions and other financial entitlements in Euros (Presented by the Commission in accordance with Article 24 of the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities); 2. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 laying down the conditions and procedure for applying the tax for the benefit of the European Communities (Presented by the Commission in accordance with Article 13 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities); 3. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 122/66/EEC of the Councils laying down the list of places for which a transport allowance may be granted (Presented by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 65 (3) of the Staff Regulations); 4. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 300/76 determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shiftwork, and the rates and conditions thereof (Presented by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 56a of the Staff Regulations). COM (1998) 324 final, 20 May 1998

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In this paper we examine the effect of law on foreign direct investment outflows with a specific interest in the relationship between international investment law and domestic private property laws. Our results indicate that FDI investor is indifferent to host country property rights, hence shareholder protection by law is not a significant determinant of FDI outflows. We argue that FDI, in contrast with other types of capital flows, can effectively mitigate the agency problem through majority ownership and control, hence reduce exposure to ex-post expropriation by the affiliate. On the other hand, FDI investor remains exposed to risk of expropriation by the host government and is strongly sensitive to the enforcement of law in the host country. In contrast with recent literature we conclude that there are no causal relationship between bilateral investment treaties and FDI.