β-Lactam Monotherapy vs β-Lactam-Macrolide Combination Treatment in Moderately Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The clinical benefit of adding a macrolide to a β-lactam for empirical treatment of moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To test noninferiority of a β-lactam alone compared with a β-lactam and macrolide combination in moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial conducted from January 13, 2009, through January 31, 2013, in 580 immunocompetent adult patients hospitalized in 6 acute care hospitals in Switzerland for moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia. Follow-up extended to 90 days. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with a β-lactam and a macrolide (combination arm) or with a β-lactam alone (monotherapy arm). Legionella pneumophila infection was systematically searched and treated by addition of a macrolide to the monotherapy arm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of patients not reaching clinical stability (heart rate <100/min, systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg, temperature <38.0°C, respiratory rate <24/min, and oxygen saturation >90% on room air) at day 7. RESULTS: After 7 days of treatment, 120 of 291 patients (41.2%) in the monotherapy arm vs 97 of 289 (33.6%) in the combination arm had not reached clinical stability (7.6% difference, P = .07). The upper limit of the 1-sided 90% CI was 13.0%, exceeding the predefined noninferiority boundary of 8%. Patients infected with atypical pathogens (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.85) or with Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) category IV pneumonia (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.10) were less likely to reach clinical stability with monotherapy, whereas patients not infected with atypical pathogens (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.80-1.22) or with PSI category I to III pneumonia (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.36) had equivalent outcomes in the 2 arms. There were more 30-day readmissions in the monotherapy arm (7.9% vs 3.1%, P = .01). Mortality, intensive care unit admission, complications, length of stay, and recurrence of pneumonia within 90 days did not differ between the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We did not find noninferiority of β-lactam monotherapy in patients hospitalized for moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia. Patients infected with atypical pathogens or with PSI category IV pneumonia had delayed clinical stability with monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00818610.

Predictors of asthma control in everyday clinical practice in Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of improved asthma control under conditions of everyday practice in Switzerland. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A subgroup of 1380 patients with initially inadequately controlled asthma was defined from a cohort of 1893 asthmatic patients (mean age 45.3 + or - 19.2 years) recruited by 281 office-based physicians who participated in a previously-conducted asthma control survey in Switzerland. Multiple regression techniques were used to identify predictors of improved asthma control, defined as an absolute decrease of 0.5 points or more in the Asthma Control Questionnaire between the baseline (V1) and follow-up visit (V2). RESULTS: Asthma control between V1 and V2 improved in 85.7%. Add-on treatment with montelukast was reported in 82.9% of the patients. Patients with worse asthma control at V1 and patients with good self-reported adherence to therapy had significantly higher chances of improved asthma control (OR = 1.24 and 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-1.29 and 1.20-2.50, respectively). Compared to adding montelukast and continuing the same inhaled corticosteroid/fixed combination (ICS/FC) dose, the addition of montelukast to an increased ICS/FC dose yielded a 4 times higher chance of improved asthma control (OR = 3.84, 95% CI 1.58-9.29). Significantly, withholding montelukast halved the probability of achieving improved asthma control (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.33-078). The probability of improved asthma control was almost 5 times lower among patients in whom FEV(1) was measured compared to those in whom it was not (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09-0.55). Patients with severe persistent asthma also had a significantly lower probability of improved control (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.07-0.32), as did older patients (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analyses which excluded patients whose asthma may have been misdiagnosed and might in reality have been chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of everyday clinical practice, the addition of montelukast to ICS/FC and good adherence to therapy increased the likelihood of achieving better asthma control at the follow-up visit, while older age and more severe asthma significantly decreased it.

Myocardial flow reserve by Rb-82 cardiac PET improves the selection of patients eligible for invasive coronary angiography

Aim: We asked whether myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by Rb-82 cardiac PET improve the selection of patients eligible for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Material and Methods: We enrolled 26 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease who performed dynamic Rb-82 PET/CT and (ICA) within 60 days; 4 patients who underwent revascularization or had any cardiovascular events between PET and ICA were excluded. Myocardial blood flow at rest (rMBF), at stress with adenosine (sMBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR=sMBF/rMBF) were estimated using the 1-compartment Lortie model (FlowQuant) for each coronary arteries territories. Stenosis severity was assessed using computer-based automated edge detection (QCA). MFR was divided in 3 groups: G1:MFR<1.5, G2:1.5≤MFR<2 and G3:2≤MFR. Stenosis severity was graded as non-significant (<50% or FFR ≥0.8), intermediate (50%≤stenosis<70%) and severe (≥70%). Correlation between MFR and percentage of stenosis were assessed using a non-parametric Spearman test. Results: In G1 (44 vessels), 17 vessels (39%) had a severe stenosis, 11 (25%) an intermediate one, and 16 (36%) no significant stenosis. In G2 (13 vessels), 2 (15%) vessels presented a severe stenosis, 7 (54%) an intermediate one, and 4 (31%) no significant stenosis. In G3 (9 vessels), 0 vessel presented a severe stenosis, 1 (11%) an intermediate one, and 8 (89%) no significant stenosis. Of note, among 11 patients with 3-vessel low MFR<1.5 (G1), 9/11 (82%) had at least one severe stenosis and 2/11 (18%) had at least one intermediate stenosis. There was a significant inverse correlation between stenosis severity and MFR among all 66 territories analyzed (rho= -0.38, p=0.002). Conclusion: Patients with MFR>2 could avoid ICA. Low MFR (G1, G2) on a vessel-based analysis seems to be a poor predictor of severe stenosis severity. Patients with 3-vessel low MFR would benefit from ICA as they are likely to present a significant stenosis in at least one vessel.

Arterial hypertension and associated factors in patients submitted to myocardial revascularization

OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence of arterial hypertension and associated factors in patients submitted to myocardial revascularization. METHOD Cross-sectional study using the database of a hospital in São Paulo (SP, Brazil) containing 3010 patients with coronary artery disease submitted to myocardial revascularization. A multiple logistic regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with hypertension (statistical significance: p<0.05). RESULTS Prevalence of hypertension was 82.8%. After the variables were adjusted, the associated factors were as follows: age, odds ratio (OR): OR=1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): CI:1.00-1.02; female gender: (OR=1.77;CI:1.39-2.25); brown-skin race: (OR=1.53;CI:1.07-2.19); obesity: (OR=1.53;CI:1.13-2.06); diabetes: (OR=1.90;CI:1.52-2.39); dyslipidemia: (OR=1.51;CI:1.23-1.85); and creatinine>1.3: (OR=1.37;CI:1.09-1.72). CONCLUSION A high prevalence of arterial hypertension and association with both non-modifiable and modifiable factors was observed.

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 53 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 64 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 66 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 69 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 71 / Partie 2 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 58 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 61 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 55 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 56 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 59 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1

Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860 ; 52-61, 63-82. Convention nationale. Série 1 / Tome 80 / impr. par ordre du Sénat et de la Chambre des députés ; fondé par MM. Mavidal et E. Laurent ; continué́ par M. L. Lataste,... M. Louis Claveau,... M. Constant Pionnier,... [et al.]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 3.1