Social anxiety disorder women easily recognize fearfull, sad and happy faces: The influence of gender

Background: It has been suggested that individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD) are exaggeratedly concerned about approval and disapproval by others. Therefore, we assessed the recognition of facial expressions by individuals with SAD, in an attempt to overcome the limitations of previous studies. Methods: The sample was formed by 231 individuals (78 SAD patients and 153 healthy controls). All individuals were treatment naive, aged 18-30 years and with similar socioeconomic level. Participants judged which emotion (happiness, sadness, disgust, anger, fear, and surprise) was presented in the facial expression of stimuli displayed on a computer screen. The stimuli were manipulated in order to depict different emotional intensities, with the initial image being a neutral face (0%) and, as the individual moved on across images, the expressions increased their emotional intensity until reaching the total emotion (100%). The time, accuracy, and intensity necessary to perform judgments were evaluated. Results: The groups did not show statistically significant differences in respect to the number of correct judgments or to the time necessary to respond. However, women with SAD required less emotional intensity to recognize faces displaying fear (p = 0.002), sadness (p = 0.033) and happiness (p = 0.002), with no significant differences for the other emotions or men with SAD. Conclusions: The findings suggest that women with SAD are hypersensitive to threat-related and approval-related social cues. Future studies investigating the neural basis of the impaired processing of facial emotion in SAD using functional neuroimaging would be desirable and opportune. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Anxiolytic and panicolytic effects of escitalopram in the elevated T-maze

Escitalopram is a highly selective inhibitor of serotonin re-uptake that is used to treat anxiety disorders. In the present study, we investigated the effects of acute, sub-chronic ( 14 days) and chronic ( 21 days) administration of escitalopram ( 2, 4 and 8 mg/kg, P0) on the performance of rats in the elevated T-maze. For comparison, imipramine ( 15 mg/ kg, P0) was also studied. The apparatus is made of three elevated arms of equal dimension, one enclosed transversal to the two open arms. Inhibitory avoidance of the open arms, trained in the enclosed arm, has been related to generalised anxiety disorder, while one-way escape from one open arm, to panic disorder. After acute administration, the three doses of escitalopram impaired avoidance ( anxiolytic effect), while imipramine was ineffective. Escape was unaffected by either drug. With sub-chronic administration, both drugs were ineffective on either avoidance or escape. After chronic treatment, avoidance was impaired by imipramine and by the two highest doses of escitalopram. In addition, escape was impaired (panicolytic effect) by imipramine and by the highest dose of escitalopram. Locomotion measured in a square arena was increased by the three doses of escitalopram, given chronically. Therefore, both imipramine and escitalopram had anxiolytic and panicolytic-like effects after chronic administration, but acutely only escitalopram decreased anxiety. Since no such effect was observed following subchronic administration, it is likely that the mechanisms of the early and late anxiolytic actions of escitalopram are different.