Clef de l'interprétation hébrai͏̈que : ou Analyse étymologique des racines de cette langue ...

par Étienne de Campos Leyza

Ayi͏̈ne Roâh : méthode intuitive et élémentaire de la langue hébraique ; a l'usage des commençants

par S. Hallel

Les parlers judéo-romans et la Vetus Latina : etude sur les rapports entre les trad. bibliques en langue romane des Juifs au moyen âge et les anciennes versions

D. S. Blondheim

La langue hébrai͏̈que restituée, et le véritable sens des mots hébreux : rétabli et prouvé par leur analyse radicale

par Fabre-D'Olivet

"Chir akavod" : album de chants religieux chez les Israe͏̈lites du rite Espagnol ; pour le piano

recueillis par Maurice J. Rosenspier

Nouveau petit dictionnaire judéo-espagnol-français=Nuev'o g'iqo diqsijonnarijo

par Salomon Israel Cherezli

Linguista sum... sed lingua non definio. Absence de définition de la langue et circularité de la construction structurale

This article analyzes the Jakobsonian classification of aphasias. It aims to show on the one hand the non-linguistic character of this classification and on the other hand its asymmetry, in spite of the fact that its author had conceived his structural construction as symmetrical. The non-linguistic character of Jakobson’s formulation is due to the absence of any definition of language, this absence being the main characteristic of Jakobsonian linguistics: concerning the aphasia problem, the Jakobsonian formulation is linguistic solely by virtue of its object, aphasia, which is already considered as a linguistic concern because it belongs to the field of « language », but which is not defined as such (as linguistic). As for asymmetry, it demonstrates first the circularity of the Jakobsonian representation of language (the duality between structure and functioning), and secondly the non-linguistic character – in the Saussurean sense of the term – of the aphasia problem. Thus it appears that breaking (in the sense of Gaston Bachelard) with idiom is the prerequisite of a scientific apprehension of language, and therefore of any interdisciplinarity, this being one of Jakobson’s favorite topics but one that this linguist failed to render fruitful because he did not offer a real definition of language.