932 resultados para 66-2
Resumo:
berechnet u. zsgest. von B. Cohn
Resumo:
Vorbesitzer: Abraham Merzbacher
Resumo:
Vorbesitzer: St. Peter Urach; Bartholomaeusstift Frankfurt am Main;
Resumo:
BACKGROUND Postoperative hemithoracic radiotherapy has been used to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma, but it has not been assessed in a randomised trial. We assessed high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS We did this phase 2 trial in two parts at 14 hospitals in Switzerland, Belgium, and Germany. We enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed malignant pleural mesothelioma; resectable TNM stages T1-3 N0-2, M0; WHO performance status 0-1; age 18-70 years. In part 1, patients were given three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 given every 3 weeks) and extrapleural pneumonectomy; the primary endpoint was complete macroscopic resection (R0-1). In part 2, participants with complete macroscopic resection were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive high-dose radiotherapy or not. The target volume for radiotherapy encompassed the entire hemithorax, the thoracotomy channel, and mediastinal nodal stations if affected by the disease or violated surgically. A boost was given to areas at high risk for locoregional relapse. The allocation was stratified by centre, histology (sarcomatoid vs epithelioid or mixed), mediastinal lymph node involvement (N0-1 vs N2), and T stage (T1-2 vs T3). The primary endpoint of part 1 was the proportion of patients achieving complete macroscopic resection (R0 and R1). The primary endpoint in part 2 was locoregional relapse-free survival, analysed by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00334594. FINDINGS We enrolled patients between Dec 7, 2005, and Oct 17, 2012. Overall, we analysed 151 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 113 (75%) had extrapleural pneumonectomy. Median follow-up was 54·2 months (IQR 32-66). 52 (34%) of 151 patients achieved an objective response. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were neutropenia (21 [14%] of 151 patients), anaemia (11 [7%]), and nausea or vomiting (eight [5%]). 113 patients had extrapleural pneumonectomy, with complete macroscopic resection achieved in 96 (64%) of 151 patients. We enrolled 54 patients in part 2; 27 in each group. The main reasons for exclusion were patient refusal (n=20) and ineligibility (n=10). 25 of 27 patients completed radiotherapy. Median total radiotherapy dose was 55·9 Gy (IQR 46·8-56·0). Median locoregional relapse-free survival from surgery, was 7·6 months (95% CI 4·5-10·7) in the no radiotherapy group and 9·4 months (6·5-11·9) in the radiotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or higher toxic effects related to radiotherapy were nausea or vomiting (three [11%] of 27 patients), oesophagitis (two [7%]), and pneumonitis (two [7%]). One patient died of pneumonitis. We recorded no toxic effects data for the control group. INTERPRETATION Our findings do not support the routine use of hemithoracic radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy. FUNDING Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, Eli Lilly.
Resumo:
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious disease that caused several large outbreaks in Europe in the last century. The last important outbreak in Switzerland took place in 1965/66 and affected more than 900 premises and more than 50,000 animals were slaughtered. Large-scale emergency vaccination of the cattle and pig population has been applied to control the epidemic. In recent years, many studies have used infectious disease models to assess the impact of different disease control measures, including models developed for diseases exotic for the specific region of interest. Often, the absence of real outbreak data makes a validation of such models impossible. This study aimed to evaluate whether a spatial, stochastic simulation model (the Davis Animal Disease Simulation model) can predict the course of a Swiss FMD epidemic based on the available historic input data on population structure, contact rates, epidemiology of the virus, and quality of the vaccine. In addition, the potential outcome of the 1965/66 FMD epidemic without application of vaccination was investigated. Comparing the model outcomes to reality, only the largest 10% of the simulated outbreaks approximated the number of animals being culled. However, the simulation model highly overestimated the number of culled premises. While the outbreak duration could not be well reproduced by the model compared to the 1965/66 epidemic, it was able to accurately estimate the size of the area infected. Without application of vaccination, the model predicted a much higher mean number of culled animals than with vaccination, demonstrating that vaccination was likely crucial in disease control for the Swiss FMD outbreak in 1965/66. The study demonstrated the feasibility to analyze historical outbreak data with modern analytical tools. However, it also confirmed that predicted epidemics from a most carefully parameterized model cannot integrate all eventualities of a real epidemic. Therefore, decision makers need to be aware that infectious disease models are useful tools to support the decision-making process but their results are not equal valuable as real observations and should always be interpreted with caution.
Resumo:
3 Briefe zwischen Charlotte Bühler und Max Horkheimer, 1946 sowie 4 Papers von Charlotte Bühler zum Antisemitismus; 55 Briefe zwischen Ermin Cahn, Max Cahn und Max Horkheimer, 1941-1949; 1 Brief und Beilage von Max Horkheimer an Max L. Cahn, 1948; 6 Briefe zwischen der Society for the Protection of Science and Learning und Max Horkheimer, 1944-1948; 16 Briefe zwischen Hadley Cantril und Max Horkheimer, 1948-1949 sowie 2 Manuskripte von Hadley Cantril : The Development od a Scientific Morality; Trends of Opinion During World War II; 12 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Charles Carlé und Max Horkheimer, 1942-1943;
Resumo:
2 Briefe zwischen F. Champion Ward und Max Horkheimer, 1967; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an John Slawson, 1962; 21 Briefe zwischen dem Direktor der Stadt- und Unibibliothek Frankfurt am Main Professor Clemens Köttelwesch und Max Horkheimer, 1956-; 1 Brief an Hertha Dembitzer, 1974; 1 Brief von Hertha Dembitzer, 1974; Schenkungsbrief 1956; Hertha Dembitzer: 2 Briefe zwischen Hertha Dembitzer und Clemens Köttelwesch, 1974;
Resumo:
Vorbesitzer: Dominikanerkloster Frankfurt am Main
Resumo:
Trägerband: Q 16/109; Vorbesitzer: Philippus Jacobus Otto
Resumo:
Vorbesitzer: Freiherren von Holzhausen
Resumo:
Henkel
Resumo:
Transliterationsvarianten: Nôfet ṣûfîm. Nophet Zuphim. Sefer nofet tsufim
Resumo:
"American Jewish Committee. Progress Report of the Scientific Department" (22.6.1945), a) als Typoskript vervielfältigt, 27 Blatt, b) Typoskript, 28 Blatt; "Über Geschichte und Tätigkeiten des Instituts für Sozialforschung", Interview Leo Löwenthal - David Berger gesendet am 29.10.1947 (?) von Radio Newsreel, USA, deutsche Übersetzung, als Typoskript vervielfältigt, mit handschriftlichen Korrekturen, 19 Blatt; "Papers Regarding the Institute of Social Research" (August 1948), Abschriften aus verschiedenen Berichten und Briefen, Typoskript, 14 Blatt; P. Hübner: "Soziologie im Kampf gegen das Vorurteil. HICOG fördert Institut für Sozialforschung an Frankfurts Universität", veröffentlicht in: Neue Zeitung, Frankfurt (1950), Typoskript mit handschriftlichen Korrekturen von Max Horkheimer, 3 Blatt; Theodor W. Adorno: "Plans of New Research Projects of the 'Institut für Sozialforschung'" (November 1950), Typoskript, 7 Blatt; "Memorandum über das Institut für Sozialforschung an der Universität Frankfurt/Main" (November 1950), a)-d) deutsche Fassung, 41 Blatt (mit Anlagen); e)-f) englische Fassung, 25 Blatt (mit Anlagen); "The Institute for Social Research, Oslo, Norway" (1950), Drucksache, 2 Blatt; "Report for UNESCO, Paris", Über das Institut für Sozialforschung (5.4. 1951), a) englische Fassung, Typoskript, 3 Blatt, b) deutscher Entwurf, Typoskript, 3 Blatt; Institut zur Förderung öffentlicher Angelegenheiten e.V., Frankfurt am Main: "3 Rundschreiben. Betreff: Clearingstelle zur Meinungsforschung (empirische Sozialforschung), Materialien zur Meinungsforschung, Institut für Sozialforschung an der Johann-Wolfgang Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt am Main" (16.4.1951), als Typoskript vervielfältigt, 4 Blatt; "Progress Report on the Institute of Social Research's Work at Frankfurt University" (10.2.1951), als Typoskript vervielfältigt, 2 Blatt; "Bericht über Geschichte und Tätigkeit des Instituts für Sozialforschung an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main" (1.7.1951), a) Typoskript, 3 Blatt, b) als Entwurf für ein Rundschreiben von Friedrich Pollock, Typoskript, 4 Blatt; Angaben über das Institut für Sozialforschung, Frankfurt, Antworten für einen Fragebogen (September 1951), Typoskript, 2 Blatt; "Memorandum über Arbeiten und die Organisation des Instituts" (Mai 1953), Typoskript, 4 Blatt;
Resumo:
Neumann, Franz L.: "Labor Under National Socialism", 19.03.1942. Typoskript, 66 Blatt; Löwenthal, Leo: "Notes on a Study in News Commentators" 23.01.1943; "Notes on a Study on News Commentators". Typoskript, 34 Blatt; "Treatment of Selected New Topics in News and News Commentator Programs". Typoskript, 53 Blatt; Forschungsprojekte und Memoranden zur Umgestaltung Nachkriegs-Deutschlands, besonders zur Umerziehung, 1942-1949; 1. "Project To Survey Present German Educational Practices in the Field of Social Sciences as a Means for Democratization. Supplementary Statements" 28.02.1949; a) Teilstück, Typoskript, 1 Blatt; b)-f) Typoskripte, zum Teil mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen von Max Horkheimer, 21 Blatt; g) Eigenhändige Notizen von Max Horkheimer, 1 Blatt; h) Eigenhändige Notizen von Theodor W. Adorno, 1 Blatt; 2. Marcuse, Herbert: 2 Briefe mit Unterschrift an Max Horkheimer und Beil, ohne Ort, 1949; 1 Brief mit Unterschrift von Max Horkheimer, Pacific Palisades, 25.02.1949; 3. "German Project" a) Typoskript mit handschriftlichen Korrekturen, 12 Blatt; b) Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen von Max Horkheimer, 12 Blatt; c) Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen von Max Horkheimer, 5 Blatt; d) Eigenhändige Notizen von Max Horkheimer, 1 Blatt; 4. Emhardt, K.H.: 1 Briefabschrift an Max Horkheimer, München, 20.06.1948, 1 Blatt; 5. "Untersuchunge über die Durchführung und das Ergebnis der politischen Säuberung an den Hochschulen der Westzone" a) Typoskript, 4 Blatt; b) Typoskript mit handschriftlichen Korrekturen, 2 Blatt; 6. Über Antisemitismus und politische Fragen im Nachkriegsdeutschland. Auszug aus einem Brief von "F.L.", 1949, Typoskirpt, 9 Blatt; 7. "Liste of Signers of the 1933 manifesto". 1 Blatt; 8. Marcuse, Herbert: Über Probleme der Demokratisierung und des Chauvinismus im Nachkriegsdeutschland. Teilstück eines Typoskripts, 4 Blatt, mit einem eigenhändigen Brief mit Unterschrift an Leo Löwenthal, ohne Ort, 25.11.1948, 1 Blatt;
Resumo:
Vilbel, Krebbelzeitungen: Verkauf