Do health care providers use online patient ratings to improve the quality of care?

Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care. Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care. Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers' demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care. Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.

Communication du risque et clarification des valeurs, deux éléments essentiels de la décision partagée : étude descriptive dans cinq unités de médecine familiale du Québec

Cette étude descriptive transversale visait à estimer la proportion de consultations en médecine familiale dans lesquelles sont observées une communication des risques et une clarification des valeurs et des préférences. Au sein de 238 dyades de cliniciens-patients (238 patients et 71 cliniciens), nous avons observé que 63 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 54 % - 70 %) des consultations comportaient ces deux éléments. Aussi, nous avons observé que six facteurs étaient associés à la présence de ces deux éléments lors de la consultation : 1) les nouvelles options thérapeutiques (rapport de cotes [RC] = 3,54; IC à 95 % : 1,32 - 9,48); 2) les options de traitement (RC = 3,56, IC à 95 % : 1,52 - 8,36); 3) la présence de cinq décisions et plus (RC = 5,00; IC à 95 % : 1,5 - 16,9); 4) report de la décision (RC = 4,92; IC à 95 % : 1,35 - 17,87); 5) la durée de la consultation (RC = 1,03; IC à 95 % : 1,002 - 1,07) et 6) le style de prise de décision collaboratif du clinicien (RC = 8,78; IC à 95% : 1,62 - 47,71). Des interventions ciblant directement les facteurs modifiables sont à considérer en vue d’augmenter la présence de ces deux éléments durant la consultation en médecine familiale.

Feminist Disability Theory: Domestic Violence Against Women with a Disability

Women with a disability continue to experience social oppression and domestic violence as a consequence of gender and disability dimensions. Current explanations of domestic violence and disability inadequately explain several features that lead women who have a disability to experience violent situations. This article incorporates both disability and material feminist theory as an alternative explanation to the dominant approaches (psychological and sociological traditions) of conceptualising domestic violence. This paper is informed by a study which was concerned with examining the nature and perceptions of violence against women with a physical impairment. The emerging analytical framework integrating material feminist interpretations and disability theory provided a basis for exploring gender and disability dimensions. Insight was also provided by the women who identified as having a disability in the study and who explained domestic violence in terms of a gendered and disabling experience. The article argues that material feminist interpretations and disability theory, with their emphasis on gender relations, disablism and poverty, should be used as an alternative tool for exploring the nature and consequences of violence against women with a disability.

Health information management : What business are we in?

Developments in information technology will drive the change in records management; however, it should be the health information managers who drive the information management change. The role of health information management will be challenged to use information technology to broker a range of requests for information from a variety of users, including he alth consumers. The purposes of this paper are to conceptualise the role of health information management in the context of a technologically driven and managed health care environment, and to demonstrat e how this framework has been used to review and develop the undergraduate program in health information management at the Queensland University of Technology.