Agonists and antagonists of protease activated receptors (PARs)

Protease activated receptors (PARs) are a category of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) implicated in the progression of a wide range of diseases, including thrombosis, inflammatory disorders, and proliferative diseases. Signal transduction via PARs proceeds via an unusual activation mechanism. Instead of being activated through direct interaction with an extracellular signal like most GPCRs. they are self-activated following cleavage of their extracellular N-terminus by serine proteases to generate a new receptor N-terminus that acts as an intramolecular ligand by folding back onto itself and triggering receptor activation. Short synthetic peptides corresponding to this newly exposed N-terminal tethered ligand can activate three of the four known PARs in the absence of proteases. and such PAR activating peptides (PAR-APs) have served as templates for agonist/antagonist development. In fact much of the evidence for involvement of PARs in diseases has relied upon use of PAR-APs. often of low potency and uncertain selectivity. This review summarizes current structures of PAR agonists and antagonists, the need for more selective and more potent PAR ligands that activate or antagonize this intriguing class of receptors, and outlines the background relevant to PAR activation, assay methods, and physiological properties anticipated for PAR ligands.

Parasitic castration by the digenian trematode Allopodocotyle sp alters gene expression in the brain of the host mollusc Haliotis asinina

Infection of molluscs by digenean trematode parasites typically results in the repression of reproduction - the so-called parasitic castration. This is known to occur by altering the expression of a range of host neuropeptide genes. Here we analyse the expression levels of 10 members of POU, Pax, Sox and Hox transcription factor gene families, along with genes encoding FNIRFamide, prohormone convertase and P-tubulin, in the brain ganglia of actively reproducing (summer), non-reproducing (winter) and infected Haliotis asinina (a vetigastropod mollusc). A number of the regulatory genes are differentially expressed in parasitised H. asinina, but in only a few cases do expression patterns in infected animals match those occurring in animals where reproduction is normally repressed. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

Solution structure and novel insights into the determinants of the receptor specificity of human relaxin-3

Relaxin- 3 is the most recently discovered member of the relaxin family of peptide hormones. In contrast to relaxin- 1 and - 2, whose main functions are associated with pregnancy, relaxin- 3 is involved in neuropeptide signaling in the brain. Here, we report the solution structure of human relaxin- 3, the first structure of a relaxin family member to be solved by NMR methods. Overall, relaxin- 3 adopts an insulin- like fold, but the structure differs crucially from the crystal structure of human relaxin- 2 near the B- chain terminus. In particular, the B- chain C terminus folds back, allowing Trp(B27) to interact with the hydrophobic-core. This interaction partly blocks the conserved RXXXRXXI motif identified as a determinant for the interaction with the relaxin receptor LGR7 and may account for the lower affinity of relaxin- 3 relative to relaxin for this receptor. This structural feature is likely important for the activation of its endogenous receptor, GPCR135.

Conditional deletion of hypothalamic Y2 receptors reverts gonadectomy-induced bone loss in adult mice

Reduction in levels of sex hormones at menopause in women is associated with two common, major outcomes, the accumulation of white adipose tissue, and the progressive loss of bone because of excess osteoclastic bone resorption exceeding osteoblastic bone formation. Current antiresorptive therapies can reduce osteoclastic activity but have only limited capacity to stimulate osteoblastic bone formation and restore lost skeletal mass. Likewise, the availability of effective pharmacological weight loss treatments is currently limited. Here we demonstrate that conditional deletion of hypothalamic neuropeptide Y2 receptors can prevent ongoing bone loss in sex hormone-deficient adult male and female mice. This benefit is attributable solely to activation of an anabolic osteoblastic bone formation response that counterbalances persistent elevation of bone resorption, suggesting the Y2-mediated anabolic pathway to be independent of sex hormones. Furthermore, the increase in fat mass that typically occurs after ovariectomy is prevented by germ line deletion of Y2 receptors, whereas in male mice body weight and fat mass were consistently lower than wild-type regardless of sex hormone status. Therefore, this study indicates a role for Y2 receptors in the accumulation of adipose tissue in the hypogonadal state and demonstrates that hypothalamic Y2 receptors constitutively restrain osteoblastic activity even in the absence of sex hormones. The increase in bone formation after release of this tonic inhibition suggests a promising new avenue for osteoporosis treatment.

Opioids and NMDA receptors: Neuro-excitation and abnormal pain behaviours

In the clinical setting, chronic administration of high doses of systemic morphine may result in neuro-excitatory behaviours such as myoclonus and allodynia in some patients. Additionally, high doses of m-opioid agonists such as morphine administered chronically by the intrathecal route in both rats and humans, as well as DAMGO in rats, have been reported to produce neuro-excitatory behaviours. However, more recently, it has begun to be appreciated that even at normal analgesic doses, opioids such as morphine are capable not only of activating pain inhibitory systems (analgesia/antinociception), but they also activate pain facilitatory systems such that post-opioid allodynia/hyperalgesia may be evident after cessation of opioid treatment. Whilst it is well documented that opioid receptors mediate the inhibitory effects of opioid analgesics, the excitatory and pro-nociceptive effects of opioids appear to involve indirect activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, such that the extent of pain relief produced may be the net effect of these two opposing actions. Apart from the NMDA-nitric oxide (NO) pro-nociceptive signaling cascade, considerable evidence also implicates dynorphin A as well as the endogenous anti-opioid peptides cholecystokinin (CCK), neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and orphanin FQ/nociceptin, in mediating opioid-induced neuro-excitation and abnormal pain behaviours. Apart from the neuro-excitatory effects that may be produced by the parent opioid, systemic administration of some opioid analgesics such as morphine and hydromorphone in rats and humans results in their rapid conversion to 3-glucuronide metabolites that also contribute significantly to the neuro-excitatory and abnormal pain behaviours produced

A key role for transmembrane prolines in calcitonin receptor-like receptor agonist binding and signalling:implications for family B G-protein-coupled receptors

Calcitonin receptor like-receptor is a family B G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). It requires receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) 1 to give a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. Little is known of how members of this receptor family function. Proline residues often form important kinks in alpha-helices. Therefore, all proline residues within the transmembrane helices of the receptor (Pro241, Pro244 in helix 4, Pro275 in helix 5, Pro321 and Pro331 in helix 6) were mutated to alanine. Pro241 Pro275, and Pro321 are highly conserved throughout all family B GPCRs. The binding of CGRP and its ability to stimulate cAMP production were investigated in mutant and wild-type receptors after transient transfection into COS-7 cells with RAMP1. The P321A mutation significantly decreased the pEC(50) for CGRP and reduced its affinity but did not change cell-surface expression. Antagonist binding [CGRP(8-37) and 1-piperidinecarboxamide N-[2-[[5amino-1-[[4-(4-pyridinyl)-1-piperazinyl]carbonyl]pentyl]amino]-1-[(3 5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-2-oxoethyl]-4-(1,4-dihydro-2-oxo-3(2H)-quina zolinyl) (BIBN4096BS)] was little altered by the mutation. Adrenomedullin-mediated signaling was disrupted when P321A was coexpressed with RAMP1, RAMP2, or RAMP3. The P331A mutant produced a moderate reduction in CGRP binding and receptor activation. Mutation of the other residues had no effect on receptor function. Thus, Pro321 and Pro331 are required for agonist binding and receptor activation. Modeling suggested that Pro321 induces a bend in helix 6, bringing its C terminus near that of helix 3, as seen in many family A GPCRs. This is abolished in P321A. P321A-I325P predicted to restore this conformation, showed wild-type activation. Modeling can also rationalize the effects of transmembrane proline mutants previously reported for another family B GPCR, the VPAC(1) receptor.

Heterodimers and family-B GPCRs:RAMPs, CGRP and adrenomedullin

RAMPs (receptor activity-modifying proteins) are single-pass transmembrane proteins that associate with certain family-B GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors). Specifically for the CT (calcitonin) receptor-like receptor and the CT receptor, this results in profound changes in ligand binding and receptor pharmacology, allowing the generation of six distinct receptors with preferences for CGRP (CT gene-related peptide) adrenomedullin, amylin and CT. There are three RAMPs: RAMP1-RAMP3. The N-terminus appears to be the main determinant of receptor pharmacology whereas the transmembrane domain contributes to association of the RAMP with the GPCR. The N-terminus of all members of the RAMP family probably contains two disulphide bonds; a potential third disulphide is found in RAMP1 and RAMP3. The N-terminus appears to be in close proximity to the ligand and plays a key role in its binding, either directly or indirectly. BIBN4096BS, a CGRP antagonist, targets RAMP1 and this gives the compound very high selectivity for the human CGRP(1) receptor.

Orexin-stimulated MAP kinase cascades are activated through multiple G-protein signalling pathways in human H295R adrenocortical cells: diverse roles for orexins A and B

Orexins A and B (ORA and ORB) are neuropeptide hormones found throughout the central nervous system and periphery. They are required for a host of physiological processes including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) regulation, steroidogenesis, appetite control and energy regulation. While some signalling mechanisms have been proposed for individual recombinant orexin receptors in generic mammalian cell types, it is clear that the peripheral effects of orexin are spatially and temporally complex. This study dissects the different G-protein signalling and MAPK pathways activated in a pluripotent human adrenal H295R cell line capable of all the physiological steps involved in steroidogenesis. Both extracellular receptor kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and p38 were phosphorylated rapidly with a subsequent decline, in a time- and dose-dependent manner, in response to both ORA and ORB. Conversely, there was little or no direct activation of the ERK5 or JNK pathway. Analysis using signalling and MAPK inhibitors as well as receptor-specific antagonists determined the precise mediators of the orexin response in these cells. Both ERK1/2 and p38 activation were predominantly Gq- and to a lesser extent Gs-mediated; p38 activation even had a small Gi-component. Effects were broadly comparable for both orexin sub-types ORA and ORB and although most of the effects were transmitted through the orexin receptor-1 subtype, we did observe a role for orexin receptor-2-mediated activation of both ERK1/2 and p38. Cortisol secretion also differed in response to ORA and ORB. These data suggest multiple roles for orexin-mediated MAPK activation in an adrenal cell-line, this complexity may help to explain the diverse biological actions of orexins with wide-ranging consequences for our understanding of the mechanisms initiated by these steroidogenic molecules.

Modulating receptor function through RAMPs:can they represent drug targets in themselves?

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are successfully exploited as drug targets. As our understanding of how distinct GPCR subtypes can be generated expands, so do possibilities for therapeutic intervention via these receptors. Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) are excellent examples of proteins that enhance diversity in. GPCR function. They facilitate the creation of binding pockets, controlling the pharmacology of some GPCRs. Moreover, they have the ability to regulate cell-surface trafficking, internalisation and signalling of GPCRs, creating novel opportunities for drug discovery. RAMPs could be directly targeted by drugs, or advantage could be taken of unique RAMP/GPCR interfaces for generating highly selective ligands.

Ligand binding and activation of the CGRP receptor

The receptor for CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) is a heterodimer between a GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor), CLR (calcitonin receptor-like receptor) and an accessory protein, RAMP1 (receptor activity-modifying protein 1). Models have been produced of RAMP1 and CLR. It is likely that the C-terminus of CGRP interacts with the extracellular N-termini of CLR and RAMP1; the extreme N-terminus of CLR is particularly important and may interact directly with CGRP and also with RAMP1. The N-terminus of CGRP interacts with the TM (transmembrane) portion of the receptor; the second ECL (extracellular loop) is especially important. Receptor activation is likely to involve the relative movements of TMs 3 and 6 to create a G-protein-binding pocket, as in Family A GPCRs. Pro321 in TM6 appears to act as a pivot. At the base of TMs 2 and 3, Arg151, His155 and Glu211 may form a loose equivalent of the Family A DRY (Asp-Arg-Tyr) motif. Although the details of this proposed activation mechanism clearly do not apply to all Family B GPCRs, the broad outlines may be conserved. ©The Authors.

Diverse functional motifs within the three intracellular loops of the CGRP1 receptor

The CGRP1 receptor exists as a heterodimeric complex between a single-pass transmembrane accessory protein (RAMP1) and a family B G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) called the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). This study investigated the structural motifs found in the intracellular loops (ICLs) of this receptor. Molecular modeling was used to predict active and inactive conformations of each ICL. Conserved residues were altered to alanine by site-directed mutagenesis. cAMP accumulation, cell-surface expression, agonist affinity, and CGRP-stimulated receptor internalization were characterized. Within ICL1, L147 and particularly R151 were important for coupling to Gs. R151 may interact directly with the G-protein, accessing it following conformational changes involving ICL2 and ICL3. At the proximal end of ICL3, I290 and L294, probably lying on the same face of an α helix, formed a G-protein coupling motif. The largest effects on coupling were observed with I290A; additionally, it reduced CGRP affinity and impaired internalization. 1290 may interact with TM6 to stabilize the conformation of ICL3, but it could also interact directly with Gs. R314, at the distal end of ICL3, impaired G-protein coupling and to a lesser extent reduced CGRP affinity; it may stabilize the TM6-ICL3 junction by interacting with the polar headgroups of membrane phospholipids. Y215 and L214 in ICL2 are required for cell-surface expression; they form a microdomain with H216 which has the same function. This study reveals similarities between the activation of CLR and other GPCRs in the role of TM6 and ICL3 but shows that other conserved motifs differ in their function. © 2006 American Chemical Society.

Present perspectives on the automated classification of the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) at the protein sequence level

The G-protein coupled receptors--or GPCRs--comprise simultaneously one of the largest and one of the most multi-functional protein families known to modern-day molecular bioscience. From a drug discovery and pharmaceutical industry perspective, the GPCRs constitute one of the most commercially and economically important groups of proteins known. The GPCRs undertake numerous vital metabolic functions and interact with a hugely diverse range of small and large ligands. Many different methodologies have been developed to efficiently and accurately classify the GPCRs. These range from motif-based techniques to machine learning as well as a variety of alignment-free techniques based on the physiochemical properties of sequences. We review here the available methodologies for the classification of GPCRs. Part of this work focuses on how we have tried to build the intrinsically hierarchical nature of sequence relations, implicit within the family, into an adaptive approach to classification. Importantly, we also allude to some of the key innate problems in developing an effective approach to classifying the GPCRs: the lack of sequence similarity between the six classes that comprise the GPCR family and the low sequence similarity to other family members evinced by many newly revealed members of the family.

Functional characterization of two human receptor activity-modifying protein 3 variants

Adrenomedullin (AM) and amylin are involved in angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis and glucose homeostasis/food intake, respectively. They activate receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)/G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) complexes. RAMP3 with the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) forms the AM(2) receptor, whereas when paired with the calcitonin receptor AMY(3) receptors are formed. RAMP3 interacts with other GPCRs although the consequences of these interactions are poorly understood. Therefore, variations in the RAMP3 sequence, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms or mutations could be relevant to human health. Variants of RAMP3 have been identified. In particular, analysis of AK222469 (Homo sapiens mRNA for receptor (calcitonin) activity-modifying protein 3 precursor variant) revealed several nucleotide differences, three of which encoded amino acid changes (Cys40Trp, Phe100Ser, Leu147Pro). Trp56Arg RAMP3 is a polymorphic variant of human RAMP3 at a conserved amino acid position. To determine their function we used wild-type (WT) human RAMP3 as a template for introducing amino acid mutations. Mutant or WT RAMP3 function was determined in Cos-7 cells with CLR or the calcitonin receptor (CT((a))). Cys40Trp/Phe100Ser/Leu147Pro RAMP3 was functionally compromised, with reduced AM and amylin potency at the respective AM(2) and AMY(3(a)) receptor complexes. Cys40Trp and Phe100Ser mutations contributed to this phenotype, unlike Leu147Pro. Reduced cell-surface expression of mutant receptor complexes probably explains the functional data. In contrast, Trp56Arg RAMP3 was WT in phenotype. This study provides insight into the role of these residues in RAMP3. The existence of AK222469 in the human population has implications for the function of RAMP3/GPCR complexes, particularly AM and amylin receptors.

Calcitonin and calcitonin receptor-like receptors:common themes with family B GPCRs?

The calcitonin receptor (CTR) and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) are two of the 15 human family B (or Secretin-like) GPCRs. CTR and CLR are of considerable biological interest as their pharmacology is moulded by interactions with receptor activity-modifying proteins. They also have therapeutic relevance for many conditions, such as osteoporosis, diabetes, obesity, lymphatic insufficiency, migraine and cardiovascular disease. In light of recent advances in understanding ligand docking and receptor activation in both the family as a whole and in CLR and CTR specifically, this review reflects how applicable general family B GPCR themes are to these two idiosyncratic receptors. We review the main functional domains of the receptors; the N-terminal extracellular domain, the juxtamembrane domain and ligand interface, the transmembrane domain and the intracellular C-terminal domain. Structural and functional findings from the CLR and CTR along with other family B GPCRs are critically appraised to gain insight into how these domains may function. The ability for CTR and CLR to interact with receptor activity-modifying proteins adds another level of sophistication to these receptor systems but means careful consideration is needed when trying to apply generic GPCR principles. This review encapsulates current thinking in the realm of family B GPCR research by highlighting both conflicting and recurring themes and how such findings relate to two unusual but important receptors, CTR and CLR.

The use of site-directed mutagenesis to study GPCRs

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are highly flexible and dynamic proteins, which are able to interact with diverse ligands, effectors, and regulatory proteins. Site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) is a powerful tool for providing insight into how these proteins actually work, both in its own right and when used in conjunction with information provided by other techniques such as crystallography or molecular modelling. Mutagenesis has been used to identify and characterise a myriad of functionally important residues, motifs and domains within the GPCR architecture, and to identify aspects of similarity and differences between the major families of GPCRs. This chapter presents the necessary information for undertaking informative SDM of these proteins. Whilst this is relevant to protein structure/function studies in -general, specific pitfalls and protocols suited to investigating GPCRs in particular will be highlighted.