The WTO and Food Security: What’s Wrong with the Rules?

The WTO Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) is the predominant multilateral legal framework governing agricultural trade. The objective of the AoA is to liberalise trade in agriculture through reductions in tariffs, domestic support and export subsidies. The AoA has not, however, ‘levelled the playing field’ and has not resulted in the equitable distribution of food, particularly for the poorer developing countries. On the other hand, support for small farmers does not ensure food security for the poor. While food security has no simple solutions such as “free trade is good for you”, reform proposals for trade rules which only address agricultural policy instruments fail to account for consumer and other interests: neither tariff reductions and subsidy disciplines, nor safeguards and other measures of producer protection can automatically increase food security. Rather, what is needed is the full and proper implementation of a number of commitments which the international community has already entered into in various human rights treaties, but which even the envisaged results of the now failed Doha Round negotiations could not ensure without revisiting relevant multilateral trade and investment rules.

Protection and Performance

We examine the linkages between import policy and export performance, extending classic macroeconomic trade effects to more recent concepts from the modern literature on gravity models. We also examine these effects empirically with a panel of global and bilateral trade spanning 15 years. Our emphasis on the role of import policy (i.e. tariffs) of exporters as an explanation of trade volumes contrasts with the recent emphasis on importer policy in the gravity literature. It also reinforces the growing body of evidence on the importance of economic environmental (policy and infrastructure) conditions in explaining relative export performance and is in line with the literature on global value chains.

Baseline Survey Report: Case study of Uluguru and Usambara mountains (Bigwa, Tangeni, Peko Misegese, Mashewa and Misalai villages)

Agriculture is the back borne of the economy of Tanzania and its main objective is to ensure food security and eradication of rural poverty through the promotion of production systems, technologies and practices that are environmental sound (Tanzania National Environmental Policy, 1999). However, this has not been achieved due to rapid land degradation, which has consequently lead to massive soil loss, decline in crop yields, disruption of water resources and the destruction of the natural resources in general. This report highlights the extent to which agricultural related activities like agronomic and cultural practices such as use of fire for preparation of farms and cutting of trees to meet villagers’ needs have devastating effect on the quality of the environment. Besides these observed difficulties this paper argued that as the survival, well being and future of the Uluguru and Usambara people it is essential to provide continuous training to farmers, so that they know how best to continue farming and harvesting forest products on a sustainable basis without causing much harm to the environment. Most of all this paper recommends the introduction of Ngolo cultivation technology on steep slopes of Usambara and Uluguru mountains in order to enhance the conservation of the environment.

Collaboration patterns, external shocks and uncertainty: Swiss nuclear energy politics before and after Fukushima

Energy shocks like the Fukushima accident can have important political consequences. This article examines their impact on collaboration patterns between collective actors in policy processes. It argues that external shocks create both behavioral uncertainty, meaning that actors do not know about other actors' preferences, and policy uncertainty on the choice and consequences of policy instruments. The context of uncertainty interacts with classical drivers of actor collaboration in policy processes. The analysis is based on a dataset comprising interview and survey data on political actors in two subsequent policy processes in Switzerland and Exponential Random Graph Models for network data. Results first show that under uncertainty, collaboration of actors in policy processes is less based on similar preferences than in stable contexts, but trust and knowledge of other actors are more important. Second, under uncertainty, scientific actors are not preferred collaboration partners.

Bosques nativos en Salta : Entre el ordenamiento territorial y los re-(des)ordenamientos posibles

En noviembre de 2007 fue sancionada la Ley Nacional No. 26.331 ("Ley de bosques"), que insta a cada provincia a realizar un Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos. Salta fue una de las primeras jurisdicciones en llevarlo adelante, a través de la Ley No. 7.543 sancionada en diciembre de 2008. En este artículo, a partir del análisis legal, documental y hemerográfico, y de entrevistas realizadas en el marco de nuestra investigación doctoral, ofrecemos una cronología y un análisis del caso salteño, con el objetivo de indagar en los proyectos territoriales en tensión que se hicieron presentes en torno a la definición de la política ambiental de cuidado de los bosques nativos, y sugerimos una serie de perspectivas a futuro en vistas de los posibles re-(des)ordenamientos territoriales

Bosques nativos en Salta : Entre el ordenamiento territorial y los re-(des)ordenamientos posibles

En noviembre de 2007 fue sancionada la Ley Nacional No. 26.331 ("Ley de bosques"), que insta a cada provincia a realizar un Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos. Salta fue una de las primeras jurisdicciones en llevarlo adelante, a través de la Ley No. 7.543 sancionada en diciembre de 2008. En este artículo, a partir del análisis legal, documental y hemerográfico, y de entrevistas realizadas en el marco de nuestra investigación doctoral, ofrecemos una cronología y un análisis del caso salteño, con el objetivo de indagar en los proyectos territoriales en tensión que se hicieron presentes en torno a la definición de la política ambiental de cuidado de los bosques nativos, y sugerimos una serie de perspectivas a futuro en vistas de los posibles re-(des)ordenamientos territoriales

Bosques nativos en Salta : Entre el ordenamiento territorial y los re-(des)ordenamientos posibles

En noviembre de 2007 fue sancionada la Ley Nacional No. 26.331 ("Ley de bosques"), que insta a cada provincia a realizar un Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos. Salta fue una de las primeras jurisdicciones en llevarlo adelante, a través de la Ley No. 7.543 sancionada en diciembre de 2008. En este artículo, a partir del análisis legal, documental y hemerográfico, y de entrevistas realizadas en el marco de nuestra investigación doctoral, ofrecemos una cronología y un análisis del caso salteño, con el objetivo de indagar en los proyectos territoriales en tensión que se hicieron presentes en torno a la definición de la política ambiental de cuidado de los bosques nativos, y sugerimos una serie de perspectivas a futuro en vistas de los posibles re-(des)ordenamientos territoriales

Bosques nativos en Salta : Entre el ordenamiento territorial y los re-(des)ordenamientos posibles

En noviembre de 2007 fue sancionada la Ley Nacional No. 26.331 ("Ley de bosques"), que insta a cada provincia a realizar un Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos. Salta fue una de las primeras jurisdicciones en llevarlo adelante, a través de la Ley No. 7.543 sancionada en diciembre de 2008. En este artículo, a partir del análisis legal, documental y hemerográfico, y de entrevistas realizadas en el marco de nuestra investigación doctoral, ofrecemos una cronología y un análisis del caso salteño, con el objetivo de indagar en los proyectos territoriales en tensión que se hicieron presentes en torno a la definición de la política ambiental de cuidado de los bosques nativos, y sugerimos una serie de perspectivas a futuro en vistas de los posibles re-(des)ordenamientos territoriales

Disciplining Investment Incentives: A Lost Cause?

An E15 Initiative think piece: Investment incentives rank among the most important policy instruments governments employ to influence the locational decisions of multinational firms. In the wake of the recent increase in locational competition and the growing impact of investment incentives and support measures for state-owned enterprises (SOEs), the need for enhanced disciplines on investment incentives has gained political and academic salience. This think piece explores the evolution of investment incentives from a development and rule-making perspective. It summarises the existing literature and examines current practices and recent trends in FDI flows and the use of various investment incentives. This is followed by a discussion of the reasons for the observed stalemate in attempts at disciplinary rule-making. The paper concludes by putting forth recommendations for data gathering and transparency that could further the move toward improved global governance founded on the increasing complementarities of trade, investment, and competition law and policy as the core pillars of a more open, inclusive, and just world economy.

Estimating the effect of chemical safety standards on firm performance in Malaysia and Vietnam

This paper uses firm-level data to examine the impact of chemical safety regulations imposed by importing countries such as RoHS and REACH on the production costs and export performance of firms in Malaysia and Vietnam. We find that in addition to the initial setup costs for compliance, EU RoHS and REACH implementation causes firms to incur additional variable production costs by requiring additional labor and capital expenditures of around 12% of the variable costs, respectively. We also find that compliance with RoHS and REACH significantly increases the probability of export. Furthermore, we find that compliance with EU RoHS and REACH helps firms to penetrate into a greater variety of countries. Also, we find that multinational enterprises and firms participating in global value chains generally exhibit better export performance and their costs rise less steeply.

Tracing CO2 emissions in global value chains

This paper integrates two lines of research into a unified conceptual framework: trade in global value chains and embodied emissions. This allows both value added and emissions to be systematically traced at the country, sector, and bilateral levels through various production network routes. By combining value-added and emissions accounting in a consistent way, the potential environmental cost (amount of emissions per unit of value added) along global value chains can be estimated. Using this unified accounting method, we trace CO2 emissions in the global production and trade network among 41 economies in 35 sectors from 1995 to 2009, basing our calculations on the World Input–Output Database, and show how they help us to better understand the impact of cross-country production sharing on the environment.