18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma: results from a pilot study.

PURPOSE: F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and MRI are used for detecting liver metastases from uveal melanoma. The introduction of new treatment options in clinical trials might benefit from early response assessment. Here, we determine the value of FDG-PET/CT with respect to MRI at diagnosis and its potential for monitoring therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy-proven liver metastases of uveal melanoma enrolled in a randomized phase III trial (NCT00110123) underwent both FDG-PET coupled with unenhanced CT and gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced liver MRI within 4 weeks. FDG-PET and MRI were evaluated blindly and then compared using the ratio of lesion to normal liver parenchyma PET-derived standardized uptake value (SUV). The influence of lesion size and response to chemotherapy were studied. RESULTS: Overall, 108 liver lesions were seen: 34 (31%) on both modalities (1-18 lesions/patient), four (4%) by PET/CT only, and 70 (65%) by MRI only. SUV correlated with MRI lesion size (r=0.81, P<0.0001). PET/CT detected 26 of 33 (79%) MRI lesions of more than or equal to 1.2 cm, whereas it detected only eight of 71 (11%) lesions of less than 1.2 cm (P<0.0001). MRI lesions without PET correspondence were small (0.6±0.2 vs. 2.1±1.1 cm, P<0.0001). During follow-up (six patients, 30 lesions), the ratio lesion-to-normal-liver SUV diminished in size-stable lesions (1.90±0.64-1.46±0.50, P<0.0001), whereas it increased in enlarging lesions (1.56±0.40-1.99±0.56, P=0.032). CONCLUSION: MRI outweighs PET/CT for detecting small liver metastases. However, PET/CT detected at least one liver metastasis per patient and changes in FDG uptake not related to size change, suggesting a role in assessing early therapy response.

Gestión de encuestas on-line dinámicas con estímulo (GEODE)

El presente proyecto ha sido pergeñado como una aplicación que pretende resolver las dos carencias principales detectadas en los sistemas clásicos de encuestas on-line gratuitos: por un lado, resultan estáticos (en el sentido de que las encuestas no son dinámicas en función de las respuestas acumuladas) y, por otro, no ofrecen al individuo encuestado el conocimiento que necesita (como máximo devolverán información agrupada de acuerdo a los resultados globales obtenidos sin retornar un análisis comparativo del grupo frente a la del usuario).

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 2, November 2001

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 3, January, 2002

Newsleter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 4, March 2002

Newsleter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 5, May 2002

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 4, April 2003

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 2, November 2002

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 1, September 2002

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 3, January/February 2003

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, October 2003

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, Vol. 52, no. 5, May 2003

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, March 2004

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, November 2003

Newsletter produced by Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition

The Lunch Line, January 2004

Newsletter produced by the Department of Education, Bureau of Food and Nutrition