Analísis de la interacción entre Actores No Gubernamentales Internacionales y Redes de Desobediencia civil. Caso de estudio: ORVEX-JAVU en el periodo 2007-2008

Han pasado ya más de diez años en los cuales, la otrora República de Venezuela, vive un clima de “Revolución Bolivariana” y que al mando de Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías, se vió soportada en sus cimientos por el apoyo y simpatía de millones de personas en el ámbito doméstico, regional e internacional. Sin embargo, y en el transcurso de su gestión, las amplias atribuciones que se ha tomado el poder ejecutivo sobre los demás poderes de la república han provocado arbitrariedades atentando en contra de Derechos Civiles y Políticos. Qué ha hecho o qué ha dejado de hacer la oposición venezolana y algunos sectores que la conforman, en la lucha contra la violación de los Derechos Civiles y Políticos? ¿Cuál ha sido el rol de los estudiantes de la educación superior venezolana? ¿Tienen estos estudiantes algún tipo de coalición transnacional fuera del país que les acompañe?

The Right to Water in the Case-Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

The human right to water is nowadays more broadly recognised, mainly due to the essential societal function that this resource plays; likewise, because of the present water scarcity is generating conflicts between its different uses. Thus, this right aims at protecting human beings by guaranteeing access to clean water that is essential to satisfy vital human needs. Similarly, access to clean water is an important element to guarantee other rights including the right to life and health. The recognition of the right to water is mainly achieved in two ways: as a new and independent right and as a subordinate or derivative right. Concerning the latter, the right to water can emanate from civil and political rights, such as the right to life; or can be derived from economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to health, the right to an adequate standard of living, and the right to housing. This contribution explores the position of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding the right to water, and analyses whether the Court has recognised the right to water and, if so, in which manner.

Legal outlier, again? U.S. felon suffrage: comparative and international human rights perspectives

The judiciousness of American felon suffrage policies has long been the subject of scholarly debate, not least due to the large number of affected Americans: an estimated 5.3 million citizens are ineligible to vote as a result of a criminal conviction. This article offers comparative law and international human rights perspectives and aims to make two main contributions to the American and global discourse. After an introduction in Part I, Part II offers comparative law perspectives on challenges to disenfranchisement legislation, juxtaposing U.S. case law against recent judgments rendered by courts in Canada, South Africa, Australia, and by the European Court of Human Rights. The article submits that owing to its unique constitutional stipulations, as well as to a general reluctance to engage foreign legal sources, U.S. jurisprudence lags behind an emerging global jurisprudential trend that increasingly views convicts’ disenfranchisement as a suspect practice and subjects it to judicial review. This transnational judicial discourse follows a democratic paradigm and adopts a “residual liberty” approach to criminal justice that considers convicts to be rights-holders. The discourse rejects regulatory justifications for convicts’ disenfranchisement, and instead sees disenfranchisement as a penal measure. In order to determine its suitability as a punishment, the adverse effects of disenfranchisement are weighed against its purported social benefits, using balancing or proportionality review. Part III analyzes the international human rights treaty regime. It assesses, in particular, Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”), which proclaims that “every citizen” has a right to vote without “unreasonable restrictions.” The analysis concludes that the phrase “unreasonable restrictions” is generally interpreted in a manner which tolerates certain forms of disenfranchisement, whereas other forms (such as life disenfranchisement) may be incompatible with treaty obligations. This article submits that disenfranchisement is a normatively flawed punishment. It fails to treat convicts as politically-equal community members, degrades them, and causes them grave harms both as individuals and as members of social groups. These adverse effects outweigh the purported social benefits of disenfranchisement. Furthermore, as a core component of the right to vote, voter eligibility should cease to be subjected to balancing or proportionality review. The presumed facilitative nature of the right to vote makes suffrage less susceptible to deference-based objections regarding the judicial review of legislation, as well as to cultural relativity objections to further the international standardization of human rights obligations. In view of this, this article proposes the adoption of a new optional protocol to the ICCPR proscribing convicts’ disenfranchisement. The article draws analogies between the proposed protocol and the ICCPR’s “Optional Protocol Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty.” If adopted, the proposed protocol would strengthen the current trajectory towards expanding convicts’ suffrage that emanates from the invigorated transnational judicial discourse.

Palm oil, land rights and ecosystem services in Gbarpolu County, Liberia

As part of the rebuilding efforts following the long civil war, the Liberian government has renegotiated long-term contracts with international investors to exploit natural resources. Substantial areas of land have been handed out in large-scale concessions across Liberia during the last five years. While this may promote economic growth at the national level, such concessions are likely to have major environmental, social and economic impacts on local communities, who may not have been consulted on the proposed developments. This report examines the potential socio-economic and environmental impacts of a proposed large-scale oil palm concession in Bopolu District, Gbarpolu County in Liberia. The research provided an in-depth mapping of current resource use, livelihoods and ecosystems services, in addition to analysis of community consultation and perceptions of the potential impacts of the proposed development. This case study of a palm oil concession in Liberia highlights wider policy considerations regarding large-scale land acquisitions in the global South: • Formal mechanisms may be needed to ensure the process of Free, Prior, Informed Consent takes place effectively with affected communities and community land rights are safeguarded. • Rigorous Environmental and Social Impact Assessments need to be conducted before operations start. Accurate mapping of customary land rights, community resources and cultural sites, livelihoods, land use, biodiversity and ecosystems services is a critical tool in this process. • Greater clarity and awareness-raising of land tenure laws and policies is needed at all levels. Good governance and capacity-building of key institutions would help to ensure effective implementation of relevant laws and policies. • Efforts are needed to improve basic services and infrastructure in rural communities and invest in food crop cultivation in order to enhance food security and poverty alleviation. Increasing access to inputs, equipment, training and advice is especially important if male and female farmers are no longer able to practice shifting cultivation due to the reduction/ loss of customary land and the need to farm more intensively on smaller areas of land.

Poverty as an Abuse of Human Rights in Ghana. : A grass roots perspective on poverty and human rights.

The study aimed at getting a grass root opinion on poverty and why Ghana is still poor after 50 years of independence in spite of her richness in natural resources, second largest producer of cocoa in the word and appreciable stable political environment. The opinions of the ordinary people in the Bia district and their observed living conditions was analysed in line with theoretical basis of the study and previous studies to justify the stance that poverty should be considered as an abuse of human rights. It was concluded based on position of informants and previous data available that though many factors have been raised by previous scholars as the cause of poverty, the actions and inactions of both internal and external power-holders is the main source of poverty in Ghana. It was proposed that for poverty to be reduced in a sustainable way there should be strong civil society groups and active citizens through civic education to hold power-holders accountable. Until the actions and inactions of power-holders which have subjected many Ghanaians into intergenerational poverty are seen as human rights abuse, the rights of many Ghanaians would be constantly abused. This will eventually defeat the promotion of human rights culture in Ghana.

A legitimidade do Ministério Público no ajuizamento de Ação Civil Pública na defesa de direitos individuais disponíveis

Estudo sobre ação civil pública e sua utilização na defesa de di rei tos essencialmente individuais. Análise do rol de legitimados para ajuizar esta ação. Presença de interesse social que justifica a propositura da ação civil pública na defesa de di rei tos individuais disponíveis homogêneos pelo Ministério Público. Garantia do acesso pleno à justiça através da atuação do Ministério Público. Estudo de caso que demonstra a ineficiência, em algumas hipóteses, das ações individuais. Verificação dos benefícios da propositura de uma ação civil pública: acesso à justiça, economia processual, segurança jurídica e evitar a ilicitude lucrativa.

Responsabilidade do estado brasileiro pela concretização da Razoável duração do processo civil

O presente trabalho possui como objetivo analisar do ponto de vista estritamente acadêmico e doutrinário a responsabilidade do Estado brasileiro na concretização da razoável duração do processo civil, postulado processual tipificado na constituição federal através da emenda nº 45, criando um novo inciso em seu art. 5º que dispõe sobre os direitos e garantias fundamentais do homem. O embasamento teórico deste trabalho se manifesta através de consiste pesquisa doutrinária, em livros e periódicos da área jurídica, realizando um cotejo das opiniões de estudiosos nacionais e estrangeiros, da área do direito público. Desenvolve-se, por fim, a noção de dupla responsabilidade do Estado, sendo a primeira, a responsabilidade do Estado como norma definidora de tarefas a serem perseguidas, e a segunda a responsabilidade civil, devida por possíveis danos gerados em processos excessivamente lentos que violam o postulado da razoável duração do processo.

Sanções ao Irã: como elas vêm impactando a sociedade civil iraniana?

O presente trabalho visa analisar quais os efeitos das sanções impostas pelos Estados Unidos da América, União Europeia e Conselho de Segurança das Nações Unidas contra a sociedade civil da República Islâmica do Irã. Inicialmente será abordado o histórico da construção das sanções, observando como se deu a relação entre os EUA e o Irã após 1979 até a imposição das mais recentes sanções, com ênfase no período pós-2009, época que apresenta uma mudança no comportamento das entidades sancionadoras. Vê-se que a política norte-americana para o Irã sempre foi baseada na dualidade entre diálogo e pressões econômicas, sendo este ultimo utilizado como ferramenta para desenvolvimento do primeiro. Em seguida se analisará todo o arcabouço jurídico construído com vistas a restringir a capacidade econômica iraniana e consequentemente sua capacidade de desenvolver seu programa nuclear. Neste capitulo é observada a amplitude que alcançaram as sanções e como estas buscam apesar de tudo gerar mecanismos de alivio a sociedade civil, deixando transparecer um discurso humanitário. O ultimo capitulo terá como ênfase os impactos das sanções na sociedade civil, nele será demonstrado que apesar das exceções legislativas, a população iraniana tem sido amplamente afetada. Através da analise de depoimentos e de noticias de periódicos serão vistas quais foram esses impactos e sua extensão. Por fim faremos um breve balanço do que fora apresentado, refletindo se quais os resultados alcançados pelas sanções e se eles superam os custos sociais impostos a população iraniana.

Por que mudar? Uma análise da transformação da jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal sobre a prisão civil de depositário infiel e da teoria dos precedentes

Por que uma corte muda seu posicionamento sobre determinado assunto? Esse trabalho objetiva analisar quais seriam as eventuais alegações e razões que acompanham a mudança de um precedente horizontal, quando da ocorrência de mudança de entendimento de um tribunal. Ainda que observando as diferenças na doutrina do stare decisis entre o commom law e o civil law no que tange à vinculação aos precedentes horizontais das Cortes, a pesquisa possui como foco a não aplicação dede um precedente horizontal do Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF sobre depositário infiel e hierarquia normativa de tratados de direitos humanos. Com vistas a analisar e classificar as manifestações dos Ministros, nesse caso em tela, procurou-se um enquadramento que oferecesse uma sistematização das razões mais comuns para uma Corte não seguir um precedente. Para tanto, foram estudados casos em que a Suprema Corte Americana alterou entendimento consolidado em precedentes horizontais e identificados os fundamentos que acompanharam a revogação dos precedentes.

Reflexões sobre a interação entre estado e sociedade civil na política de criança e adolescente no município de São Paulo

A Constituição de 1988 trouxe em seu espírito e texto a participação social na elaboração e implementação de políticas públicas. Entretanto, a realização desse espírito não acontece sem que emerjam diferentes conflitos entre Estado e sociedade civil nos processos de tomada de decisão. Os conselhos de direitos, como o Conselho Municipal dos Direitos de Crianças e Adolescentes de São Paulo, e os conselhos de políticas sociais são o locus privilegiado da interação da sociedade civil e do Poder Público na definição e no controle das políticas públicas. Ainda, as parcerias entre Estado e organizações da sociedade civil perdem oportunidade e potência por responderem também a essa lógica deficiente da participação social. Isso é o que nos mostra a experiência do Fundo Municipal dos Direitos da Criança e do Adolescente de São Paulo.

Análise do marco regulatório das organizações da sociedade civil

As parcerias entre o Poder Público e a sociedade civil organizada é uma realidade na Administração Pública e tida como fundamental ao modelo gerencial, implementada na Reforma de Estado em 1995, onde se buscou concentrar as atividades estratégicas e de formulação de políticas no Estado e alocar as atividades não exclusivas em parceiros privados. O crescimento destas parcerias e sua relevância são significativos em especial nas áreas dos Direitos Sociais. Embora já existissem normas disciplinando algumas formas de parcerias específicas foi editada uma nova legislação cuja abrangência é mais ampla, o Marco Regulatório das Organizações da Sociedade Civil. Este trabalho visa analisar esta legislação, em especial sob o aspecto de inovação e se houve e quais são as contribuições introduzidas pela nova lei

A ação civil pública como meio de concretização do direito à saúde na Constituição de 1988

The work presented here is about aspects of the constitutional extension in which is the public civil action with the objective of verifying its aptitute in tutelaging subjective situations derived from fundamental rights, especially right to health assistance. Thus, it offers a clear analysis of the practical functioning of most aspects of the public civil action (lawsuit), with philosophical foundation and necessary doctrinaire to your comphehension. How it once was (history), how it could be (reform suggestion), how it is (current interpretation of the law) and how it should be (critic analysis of the microsystem of collective tutelaging of rights, its perspectives, as well as the efficacy of the public cilvil action about accomplishment of the right to health as supraindividual right). The objective is to analyse the main version of the theme (for instance: the impacts caused to the dissociation of the Procurations theory), so that it can be extracted the philosophy and the general theory, of the public civil action and collective tutelaging in general, pragmatically applicable to study purposes. With this theorical fountain, the reader will be in a more solid position, not only being able to understand the subtilities of the public civil action, but mainly being able to recognize its faults and present solid reform proposals and improvement. It is know that the Juridical Power (Procuration) does not allow any more inactivity about negating accession to health in its collective dimension (lato sensu: spread, collective stricto sensu and homogeneous individuals), being imputed to it novel usage that consolidates in the assumption of the role instrument set aside to be used by all with organized instancy of solution to collective conflicts in large sense. This happens, overall, because of the current justice politization, understood as juridical activism, connected to the struggle between the groups defending their interests and the acceptance of the constitution about solidifying the public politics of quality health

Responsabilidade civil como função social na distribuição e revenda de combustível face ao direito do consumidor e ao meio ambiente

The civil liability of the distribution and retail fuel stems from the fact business activity developed to be high risk and can be said as risk inherent or latent danger that has predictability and normality characterized by placing the consumer in a position of vulnerability, such as the environment, both public policies defined and constitutional protection. Consumer protection as a fundamental right and the environment as the primacy of social order aims the welfare and social justice, as inserted right to the third dimension, are guarded by the State when it creates operational standards through public policies and indirectly intervenes in the economic order. This intervention is due to consumer protection and the environment are economic order principles, founded on free initiative and free competition, ensuring everyone a dignified existence which underlies the irradiation of fundamental rights in private initiative, before the commercial evaluation, mass consumption, the emergence of new technologies that link consumers to the environment before the protection of life, health and safety and ensuring a better quality of life for present and future generations. To repair this damage and the right to information are provided as fundamental rights that put the person at the epicenter of the relations and collective interest stands out against individual interests that to be done need public-private partnership. In such a way that the used methodology was an analysis of documents correlating them with bibliographic sources whose goals are to recognize the civil responsibility as limit to subjective right, having to develop a social function where guilt and risk grow distant and the damage is configured as a consequence of inherent risk, requiring the State interventional postures in fulfilling its public policy; prevailing in these risky activities the solidarity of those involved in the chain of production and socialization of damage forward those are provided directly of products of hazardous nature that put in a position of vulnerability the environment and the consumer

The role of civil society in preventing and combating human trafficking

Includes bibliography