Imported diphyllobothriasis in Switzerland: molecular evidence of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitsch, 1824)

We report for the first time in Switzerland a clinical case because of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum, identified by molecular methods. We discuss the potential for this imported species to infect local intermediate hosts and thus to achieve autochthonous cyclic transmission.

Evidence of oligogenic inheritance in nephronophthisis

Nephronophthisis is a recessive cystic renal disease that leads to end-stage renal failure in the first two decades of life. Twenty-five percent of nephronophthisis cases are caused by large homozygous deletions of NPHP1, but six genes responsible for nephronophthisis have been identified. Because oligogenic inheritance has been described for the related Bardet-Biedl syndrome, we evaluated whether mutations in more than one gene may also be detected in cases of nephronophthisis. Because the nephrocystins 1 to 4 are known to interact, we examined patients with nephronophthisis from 94 different families and sequenced all exons of the NPHP1, NPHP2, NPHP3, and NPHP4 genes. In our previous studies involving 44 families, we detected two mutations in one of the NPHP1-4 genes. Here, we detected in six families two mutations in either NPHP1, NPHP3, or NPHP4, and identified a third mutation in one of the other NPHP genes. Furthermore, we found possible digenic disease by detecting one individual who carried one mutation in NPHP2 and a second mutation in NPHP3. Finally, we detected the presence of a single mutation in nine families, suggesting that the second recessive mutation may be in another as yet unidentified NPHP gene. Our findings suggest that oligogenicity may occur in cases of nephronophthisis.

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the association of inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and lack of blinding with biased estimates of intervention effects varies with the nature of the intervention or outcome. DESIGN: Combined analysis of data from three meta-epidemiological studies based on collections of meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: 146 meta-analyses including 1346 trials examining a wide range of interventions and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratios of odds ratios quantifying the degree of bias associated with inadequate or unclear allocation concealment, and lack of blinding, for trials with different types of intervention and outcome. A ratio of odds ratios <1 implies that inadequately concealed or non-blinded trials exaggerate intervention effect estimates. RESULTS: In trials with subjective outcomes effect estimates were exaggerated when there was inadequate or unclear allocation concealment (ratio of odds ratios 0.69 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.82)) or lack of blinding (0.75 (0.61 to 0.93)). In contrast, there was little evidence of bias in trials with objective outcomes: ratios of odds ratios 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03) for inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and 1.01 (0.92 to 1.10) for lack of blinding. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of drug and non-drug interventions. Except for trials with all cause mortality as the outcome, the magnitude of bias varied between meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The average bias associated with defects in the conduct of randomised trials varies with the type of outcome. Systematic reviewers should routinely assess the risk of bias in the results of trials, and should report meta-analyses restricted to trials at low risk of bias either as the primary analysis or in conjunction with less restrictive analyses.

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias

BACKGROUND: The increased use of meta-analysis in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a randomised controlled trial. Study publication bias has been recognised as a potential threat to the validity of meta-analysis and can make the readily available evidence unreliable for decision making. Until recently, outcome reporting bias has received less attention. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We review and summarise the evidence from a series of cohort studies that have assessed study publication bias and outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials. Sixteen studies were eligible of which only two followed the cohort all the way through from protocol approval to information regarding publication of outcomes. Eleven of the studies investigated study publication bias and five investigated outcome reporting bias. Three studies have found that statistically significant outcomes had a higher odds of being fully reported compared to non-significant outcomes (range of odds ratios: 2.2 to 4.7). In comparing trial publications to protocols, we found that 40-62% of studies had at least one primary outcome that was changed, introduced, or omitted. We decided not to undertake meta-analysis due to the differences between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Recent work provides direct empirical evidence for the existence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. There is strong evidence of an association between significant results and publication; studies that report positive or significant results are more likely to be published and outcomes that are statistically significant have higher odds of being fully reported. Publications have been found to be inconsistent with their protocols. Researchers need to be aware of the problems of both types of bias and efforts should be concentrated on improving the reporting of trials.

Capillary electrophoresis evidence of the stereoselective ketoreduction of mebendazole and aminomebendazole in echinococcosis patients

An assay for the simultaneous determination of the enantiomers of hydroxymebendazole (OH-MBZ) and hydroxyaminomebendazole (OH-AMBZ) together with aminomebendazole (AMBZ) in human plasma is described for the first time. It is based upon liquid-liquid extraction at alkaline pH from 0.5 mL plasma followed by analysis of the reconstituted extract by CE with reversed polarity in the presence of a 50 mM, pH 4.2 acetate buffer containing 15 mg/mL sulfated beta-CD as chiral selector. For all compounds, detection limits are between 0.01 and 0.04 microg/mL, and intraday and interday precisions evaluated from peak area ratios are <6.9 and <8.5%, respectively. Analysis of 39 samples of echinoccocosis patients undergoing pharmacotherapy with mebendazole (MBZ) revealed that the ketoreduction of MBZ and AMBZ is highly stereoselective. One enantiomer of each metabolite (firstly detected peak in both cases) could only be detected. The CE data revealed that OH-MBZ (mean: 0.715 microg/mL) is the major metabolite followed by AMBZ (mean: 0.165 microg/mL) and OH-AMBZ (mean: 0.055 microg/mL) whereas the MBZ plasma levels (mean: 0.096 microg/mL, levels determined by HPLC) were between those of AMBZ and OH-AMBZ.

CE provides evidence of the stereoselective hydroxylation of norketamine in equines

CE with multiple isomer sulfated-CD as selector was used for the simultaneous analysis of the stereoisomers of ketamine, norketamine, 5,6-dehydronorketamine and hydroxylated metabolites of norketamine in liquid/liquid extracts of (i) in vitro incubations with ketamine or norketamine and equine liver microsomes and (ii) plasma and urine of ponies receiving a target-controlled infusion of ketamine under isoflurane anesthesia. Hydroxynorketamine metabolites with the hydroxy group at the cyclohexanone ring could be shown to be formed stereoselectively both in vitro and in vivo. Due to the lack of standard compounds, urinary extracts were fractionated by HPLC followed by characterization of the collected fractions with CE and LC-MS(n) with 0.7 mmu mass discrimination. Comparison of LC-MS(n) data obtained with the fractions, an in vitro microsomal sample, and both pony urine and hydrolyzed pony urine led to the identification of four hydroxylated norketamine metabolites with hydroxylation at the cyclohexanone ring, two with hydroxylation at the aromatic ring and four hydroxylated metabolites of ketamine. Due to the lower detection sensitivity, only the four hydroxynorketamine metabolites with hydroxylation at the cyclohexanone ring were observed by CE. The data suggest that demethylation of ketamine followed by hydroxylation of norketamine at the cyclohexanone ring is the major metabolic pathway in equine species and that the ketamine metabolism is highly stereoselective.