F-1, Food Stamp Program State Summary, June 2003

The Food Assistance Monthly Participation Report is a monthly summary of Food Assistance program participation, Statewide and for each Iowa county. Breakouts are reported for participants also in the FIP program, those only receiving Food Assistance, and those that are receiving economic assistance under other programs (primarily Medicaid). This report may also be known as the F-1 Report

A-1A Supplemental Security Income Program, June 2004

Monthly report about supplemental income produced by the Iowa Department of Human Services.

A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, July 2004

Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program

A-1A Supplemental Security Income Program, July 2004

Monthly report about supplemental income produced by the Iowa Department of Human Services.

Summary: FY03 School-Based Sealant Program, 2003

School-Based Sealant Program by the Department of Public Health, Division of Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention.

Summary: FY01 School-Based Sealant Program, 2001

School-Based Sealant Program by the Department of Public Health, Division of Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention.

Summary: FY02 School-Based Sealant Program, 2002

School-Based Sealant Program by the Department of Public Health, Division of Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention.

Soil and Water Conservation; Conservation Program Summary, 2003

Report of Conservation Program Summary produced by Iowa Departmment of Agriculture and Land Stewardship

Integrated Farm/Livestock Management Demonstration Program, 2002

Farm/Livestock Management Demonstration Program produced by Iowa Departmment of Agriculture and Land Stewardship

A note on Luttens’ Minimal rights based solidarity

Following the approach developed by Luttens (2010), we consider a model where individuals with di fferent levels of skills exert di fferent levels of e ffor. Speci fically, we propose a redistribution mechanism based on a lower bound on what every individual deserves: the so-called minimal rights (O'Neill (1982)). Our re finement of Luttens' mechanism ensures at the same time minimal rights based solidarity, participation (non-negativity) and claims feasibility. Keywords: Redistribution mechanism, Minimal rights, Solidarity, Participation, Claims feasibility. JEL classi fication: C71, D63, D71.

Development and evaluation of a shaken baby syndrome prevention program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate parents' and nurses' opinions regarding the adequacy of an educational program on shaken baby syndrome: the Perinatal Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention Program (PSBSPP). DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative assessments in the form of interviews and questionnaires administered in French. SETTING: Two birthing institutions in Montréal, QC, Canada: a university hospital and a regional center. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and sixty-three parents (73.8% mothers, 26.2% fathers) received the intervention after the birth of their child, and 69 nurses administered it. METHODS: Parents' and nurses' assessments of the adequacy and relevance of the program and nurses' assessments of the training they received to administer the program were evaluated. RESULTS: Both parents and nurses supported this initiative. Most parents appreciated the usefulness of the information. Nurses believed the program was adequate, and their training to deliver the program was satisfactory. All participants reported that the program was highly relevant, especially for new parents. CONCLUSION: The Perinatal Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention Program achieves the goals of (a) increasing parents' knowledge about infant crying, anger, and shaken baby syndrome and (b) helping parents identify coping strategies. The relevance of introducing the PSBSPP in all birthing institutions is supported. Future studies should focus on vulnerable and culturally diverse populations, and longitudinal follow-up could help determine if the PSBSPP reduces the incidence of shaken baby syndrome.

Les adresses ne s'usent... que lorsque l'on ne s'en sert pas !

Le processus de sortie est complexe, il s'inscrit dans une visée dischronique (un projet qui dépasse le temps de séjour au CTJ) et synchronique (l'état du patient doit être compatible avec l'adresse que nous lui proposons). Ce processus est amorcé par l'adresseur, dès la demande d'admission qui implicitement doit avoir une adresse de sortie en toile de fond. Les aléas de la prise en charge ne doivent pas faire disparaître les points de mire (les adresses de sortie) qui doivent être sollicitées, entretenues, dans une collaboration qui laisse entendre un« service après vente» possible. Dès l'entrée, la question de la sortie est donc pensée par et avec le patient. Les soins s'inscrivent dans un processus de continuité et de réhabilitation, à travers un travail pluridisciplinaire intimement lié à l'environnement extérieur du patient. La sortie ne met pas toujours un point final à une prise en charge, le suivi ambulatoire est un moyen efficace et progressif pour y parvenir.

2005 Highway Accomplishment Program, July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005

Future plans for funding for Iowa Department of Transportation Report.

A-1A Supplemental Security Income Program, August 2004

Monthly report about supplemental income produced by the Iowa Department of Human Services.

F-1 Food Assistance Program State Summary, August 2004

The Food Assistance Monthly Participation Report is a monthly summary of Food Assistance program participation, Statewide and for each Iowa county. Breakouts are reported for participants also in the FIP program, those only receiving Food Assistance, and those that are receiving economic assistance under other programs (primarily Medicaid). This report may also be known as the F-1 Report.