Differential cytopathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus prototypic and clinical isolates in primary pediatric bronchial epithelial cells.

Background Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes severe respiratory disease in infants. Airway epithelial cells are the principle targets of RSV infection. However, the mechanisms by which it causes disease are poorly understood. Most RSV pathogenesis data are derived using laboratory-adapted prototypic strains. We hypothesized that such strains may be poorly representative of recent clinical isolates in terms of virus/host interactions in primary human bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs). Methods To address this hypothesis, we isolated three RSV strains from infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis and compared them with the prototypic RSV A2 in terms of cytopathology, virus growth kinetics and chemokine secretion in infected PBEC monolayers. Results RSV A2 rapidly obliterated the PBECs, whereas the clinical isolates caused much less cytopathology. Concomitantly, RSV A2 also grew faster and to higher titers in PBECs. Furthermore, dramatically increased secretion of IP-10 and RANTES was evident following A2 infection compared with the clinical isolates. Conclusions The prototypic RSV strain A2 is poorly representative of recent clinical isolates in terms of cytopathogenicity, viral growth kinetics and pro-inflammatory responses induced following infection of PBEC monolayers. Thus, the choice of RSV strain may have important implications for future RSV pathogenesis studies.

Utility, Caller, and Patient Profile of a Novel Chemotherapy Telephone Helpline Service Within a Regional Cancer Centre in Northern Ireland

Background: The telephone is an accepted and useful means of communication for the management of patient care. The Chemotherapy Telephone Helpline (CTH) service, located in a large inner-city Trust within the United Kingdom, is a unique nurse-led service within Northern Ireland.

Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the utility, caller, and patient profile of a novel CTH.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of telephone contacts during 2007 to the CTH. Calls were categorized by caller and patient characteristics, reason for call, and subsequent action.

Results: A total of 7498 calls were made to the CTH during 2007. Of these, 25.6% occurred outside 8AM-4PM. Callers included patients (45.8%), lay carers (31%), and health care professionals (20.5%); 35.2% of calls concerned patients with polysymptomatic problems; 36.8% of calls led directly to patients being medically assessed.

Conclusions: The utility of the CTH service confirms the need of this nurse-led service. This service facilitates access to specialist advice and support for patients, their families, and allied health care professionals.

Implications for Practice: The international significance of these findings for practice includes its demonstration of the multifaceted symptom experience of patients receiving chemotherapy and highlights the importance of rapid access to specialist cancer services for patients and their lay and professional carers. In addition, it demonstrates the capacity of helplines to identify gaps in professional skills and training.

Patient anxiety and IV sedation in Northern Ireland

Background In recent years there has been an increase in the provision of conscious sedation, which is said to be a safe and effective means of managing the anxious patient. However, there are no guidelines to aid the dental practitioner in assessing the patient's need for sedation based on their level of anxiety.

Aims and methods The present study investigated the importance of patient anxiety as an indicator for IV sedation, using focus groups to inform the development of narrative vignettes. Ninety-nine practitioners responded to a series of scenarios to determine whether the level of patient anxiety and the patient's demand for IV sedation influenced their decision making.

Results Level of dental anxiety had a stronger influence on the clinician's decision making than patient demand, with increasing levels of dental anxiety being positively associated with the likelihood of clinicians indicating a need for IV patient sedation and also, the likelihood of clinicians providing IV sedation to these patients. Only 14% (n = 14) of respondents reported formally assessing dental anxiety.

Conclusions While dental anxiety is considered to be a key factor in determining the need for IV sedation, there is a lack of guidance regarding the assessment of anxiety among patients.