941 resultados para Honeycomb and Sandwich Cantilever Beam
Resumo:
"June 1964."
Resumo:
Fitz laboratory report 223.14.
Resumo:
"AFOSR 166."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Wright II, 2469.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Added t.-p., engraved.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
"MS 419586."
Resumo:
"Mounting kit M241E5 1450-00-078-1217 accessory kit M219E1 1450-00-179-5317 accessory kit M218E1 1450-00-179-5318 mounting kit M184 1450-00-179-6095 Pershing 1a Field Artillery Missile System.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
A set of varying-thickness Au-films were thermally evaporated onto poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) thin film surfaces. The Au/PSA bi-layer targets were then implanted with 50 keV N+ ions to a fluence of 1 × 1016 ions/cm2 to promote metal-to-polymer adhesion and to enhance their mechanical and electrical performance. Electrical conductivity measurements of the implanted Au/PSA thin films showed a sharp percolation behavior versus the pre-implant Au-film thickness with a percolation threshold near the nominal thickness of 44 Å. The electrical conductivity results are discussed along with the film microstructure and the elemental diffusion/mixing within the Au/PSA interface obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and ion beam analysis techniques (RBS and ERD).
Resumo:
The mechanical behavior of the vertebrate skull is often modeled using free-body analysis of simple geometric structures and, more recently, finite-element (FE) analysis. In this study, we compare experimentally collected in vivo bone strain orientations and magnitudes from the cranium of the American alligator with those extrapolated from a beam model and extracted from an FE model. The strain magnitudes predicted from beam and FE skull models bear little similarity to relative and absolute strain magnitudes recorded during in vivo biting experiments. However, quantitative differences between principal strain orientations extracted from the FE skull model and recorded during the in vivo experiments were smaller, and both generally matched expectations from the beam model. The differences in strain magnitude between the data sets may be attributable to the level of resolution of the models, the material properties used in the FE model, and the loading conditions (i.e., external forces and constraints). This study indicates that FE models and modeling of skulls as simple engineering structures may give a preliminary idea of how these structures are loaded, but whenever possible, modeling results should be verified with either in vitro or preferably in vivo testing, especially if precise knowledge of strain magnitudes is desired. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.