Factors influencing interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working in private settings with people with low back pain: a qualitative study

Purpose: Collaboration and interprofessional practices are highly valued in health systems everywhere, partly based on the rationale that they improve outcomes of care for people with complex health problems, such as low back pain. Research in the area of low back pain also supports the involvement of different health professionals in the interventions for people who present this condition. The aim of this studywas to identify factors influencing the interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working in private settings with people with low back pain. Relevance: Physiotherapists, like other health professionals, are encouraged to engage in interprofessional practices in their dailywork. However, to date, very little is known of their interprofessional practices, especially in private settings. Understanding physiotherapists' interprofessional practices and their influencing factors will notably advance knowledge relating to the organisation of physiotherapy services for people with low back pain. Participants: Participants in this study were 13 physiotherapists including 10 women and 3 men, having between 3 and 22 years of professional experience, and working in one of 10 regions of the Province of Quebec (Canada). In order to obtain maximal variation in the perspectives, participants were selected using a recruitment matrix including three criteria: duration of professional experience, work location, and physical proximity with other professionals. Methods: Thiswas a descriptive qualitative study using faceto- face semi-structured interviews as the main method of data collection. An interview guide was developed based on an evidence-derived frame of reference. Each interview lasted between 55 and 95 minutes and was transcribed verbatim. Analysis: Qualitative analyses took the form of content analysis, encompassing data coding and general thematic regrouping. NVivo version 8 was used to assist data organisation and analysis. Results: Multiple factors influencing the interprofessional practices of physiotherapists were identified. The main factors include the consulting person's health condition, the extent of knowledge on health professionals' roles and fields of practice, the proximity and availability of professional resources, as well as daily work schedules. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the influence of multiple factors on physiotherapists' interprofessional practices, including professional practice and organisational issues. However, further research on the interprofessional practices of physiotherapists is still required. Research priorities targeting the views of other health professionals, as well as those of services users, would enhance our comprehension of interprofessional practices of physiotherapists. Implications: This study provides new insights that improve our understanding of the interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working in private settings with people with low back pain, more specifically on the factors influencing these practices. Based on our findings, implementing changes such as improving current and future health professionals' knowledge of the fields and roles of other health professionals through training may contribute to positively influencing interprofessional practices. Keywords: Interprofessional practices; Private practice; Low back pain Funding acknowledgements: This research was supported in part by a B.E. Schnurr Memorial Fund Research Grant administered by the Physiotherapy Foundation of Canada, as well as from a clinical research partnership in physiotherapy between the Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network (REPAR) and the Ordre professionnel de la physiothérapie du Québec (OPPQ). KP received doctoral-level scholarships from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST). CE Dionne is a FRSQ senior Research Scholar. Ethics approval: This project was approved by the ethics research committee of the Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec.

Cholinergic regulation of bone.

Bone remodeling is regulated by the two branches of the autonomic nervous system: the adrenergic and the cholinergic branches. Adrenergic activity favors bone loss, whereas cholinergic activity has been recently shown to favor bone mass accrual. In vitro studies have reported that cholinergic activity induces proliferation and differentiation of bone cells. In vivo studies have shown that the inhibition of cholinergic activity favors bone loss, whereas its stimulation favors bone mass accrual. Clinical studies have shown that bone density is associated with the function of many cholinergic-regulated tissues such as the hypothalamus, salivary glands, lacrimal glands and langerhans cells, suggesting a common mechanism of control. Altogether, these observations and linked findings are of great significance since they improve our understanding of bone physiology. These discoveries have been successfully used recently to investigate new promising therapies for bone diseases based on cholinergic stimulation. Here, we review the current understanding of the cholinergic activity and its association with bone health.

The neurobiological basis of prefrontal cortex impairment in the phencyclidine model of schizophrenia : convergent reduction of synaptic glutamate release, energy metabolism and cognitive performance

RÉSUMÉ : Le traitement répété à la phencyclidine (PCP), un bloqueur du récepteur NMDA (NMDAR), reproduit chez les rongeurs une partie de la symptomatologie typique de la schizophrénie. Le blocage prolongé du NMDAR par la PCP mime une hypofunction du NMDAR, une des principales altérations supposées exister dans les cerveaux des patients schizophréniques. Le but de notre étude était d'examiner les conséquences neurochimiques, métaboliques et fonctionnelles du traitement répété à la phencyclidine in vivo, au niveau du cortex préfrontal (cpf), une région cérébrale qui joue un rôle dans les déficits cognitifs observés chez les patients schizophréniques. Pour répondre à cette question, les rats ou les souris ont reçu chaque jour une injection soit de PCP (5 mg/kg), soit de solution saline, pendant 7 ou 14 jours. Les animaux ont ensuite été sacrifiés au moins 24 heures après le dernier traitement. Des tranches aiguës du cpf ont été préparées rapidement, puis stimulées avec une concentration élevée de KCI, de manière à induire une libération de glutamate à partir des terminaisons synaptiques excitatrices. Les résultats montrent que les tranches du cpf des animaux traités à la PCP ont libéré une quantité de glutamate significativement inférieure par rapport à celles des animaux contrôle. Ce déficit de libération a persisté 72 heures après la fin du traitement, tandis qu'il n'était pas observé dans le cortex visuel primaire, une autre région corticale. En outre, le traitement avec des antipsychotiques, l'halopéridol ou l'olanzapine, a supprimé le déficit induit par la PCP. Le même déficit de libération a été remarqué sur des synaptosomes obtenus à partir du cpf des animaux traités à la phenryclidine. Cette observation indique que la PCP induit une modification plastique adaptative du mécanisme qui contrôle la libération du glutamate dans les terminaisons synaptiques. Nous avons découvert que cette modification implique la sous-régulation d'un NMDAR présynaptique, qui serait doué d'un rôle d'autorécepteur stimulateur de la libération du glutamate. Grâce à des tests comportementaux conduits en parallèle et réalisés pour évaluer la fonctionnalité du cpf, nous avons observé chez les souris traitées à la PCP une flexibilité comportementale réduite lors d'un test de discrimination de stimuli visuels/tactiles. Le déficit cognitif était encore présent 4 jours après la dernière administration de PCP. La technique de l'autoradiographie quantitative du [14C]2-deoxyglucose a permis d'associer ce déficit à une réduction de l'activité métabolique cérébrale pendant le déroulement du test, particulièrement au niveau du cpf. Dans l'ensemble, nos résultats suggèrent que le blocage prolongé du NMDAR lors de l'administration répétée de PCP produit un déficit de libération du glutamate au niveau des terminaisons synaptiques excitatrices du cpf. Un tel déficit pourrait être provoqué par la sousrégulation d'un NMDAR présynaptique, qui aurait une fonction de stimulateur de libération; la transmission excitatrice du cpf s'en trouverait dans ce cas réduite. Ce résultat est en ligne avec l'activité métabolique et fonctionnelle réduite du cpf et l'observation de déficits cognitifs induits lors de l'administration de la PCP. ABSTRACT : Sub-chronic treatment with phencyclidine (PCP), an NMDA receptor (NMDAR) channel blocker, reproduces in rodents part of the symptomatology associated to schizophrenia in humans. Prolonged pharmacological blockade of NMDAR with PCP mimics NMDAR hypofunction, one of the main alterations thought to take place in the brains of schizophrenics. Our study was aimed at investigating the neurochemical, metabolic and behavioral consequences of repeated PCP administration in vivo, focusing on the functioning of the prefrontal cortex (pfc), a brain region highly relevant for the cognitive deficits observed in schizophrenic patients. Rats or mice received a daily administration of either PCP (5 mg/kg) or saline for 7 or 14 days. At least 24 hours after the last treatment the animals were sacrificed. Acute slices of the pfc were quickly prepared and challenged with high KCl to induce synaptic glutamate release. Pfc slices from PCP-treated animals released significantly less glutamate than slices from salinetreated animals. The deficit persisted 72 hours after the end of the treatment, while it was not observed in another cortical region: the primary visual cortex. Interestingly, treatment with antipsychotic drugs, either haloperidol or olanzapine, reverted the glutamate release defect induced by PCP treatment. The same release defect was observed in synaptosomes prepared from the pfc of PCP-treated animals, indicating that PCP induces a plastic adaptive change in the mechanism controlling glutamate release in the glutamatergic terminals. We discovered that such change most likely involves the down-regulation of a newly identified, pre-synaptic NMDAR with stimulatory auto-receptor function on glutamate release. In parallel sets of behavioral experiments challenging pfc function, mice sub-chronically treated with PCP displayed reduced behavioral flexibility (reversal learning) in a visual/tactile-cued discrimination task. The cognitive deficit was still evident 4 days after the last PCP administration and was associated to reduced brain metabolic activity during the performance of the behavioral task, notably in the pfc, as determined by [14C]2-deoxyglucose quantitative autoradiography. Clverall, our findings suggest that prolonged NMDAR blockade by repeated PCP administration results in a defect of glutamate release from excitatory afferents in the pfc, possibly ascribed to down-regulation of apre-synaptic stimulatory NMDAR. Deficient excitatory neurotransmission in the pfc is consistent with the reduced metabolic and functional activation of this area and the observed PCP-induced cognitive deficits.