Deed of sale, 1735/6 March 17

Handwritten deed between grantor Isaac Holdin and grantee Andrew Bordman for Cambridge property near Black Island and bordering the land near Fresh Pond sold by Holdin's grandson, Rev. John Whiting, to Bordman on April 25 1735.

Deed of sale, 1736 May 8

Handwritten deed for furniture sold by Boston merchant Joseph Gilbert to Andrew Bordman.

Deed of sale, 1737 June 17

Deed between grantor Daniel Barrett and grantee Andrew Bordman for Cambridge land and a "new house" on Water Street bordering Bordman's own property.

Deed of sale, 1737 June 17

Deed between grantor Daniel Barrett and grantee Andrew Bordman for part of the homestead formerly belonging to Samuel Manning bordering Water Street.

Deed of sale, 1747 October 21

Deed between grantor Joshua Stratton of Watertown and grantee Andrew Bordman for Cambridge property bordered by lands owned by Isaac Holdin and Andrew Bordman.

Deed of sale, 1753 October 6

Handwritten deed between Josiah Stearns, as administrator of the estate of Moses Bordman, and grantee Andrew Bordman for Cambridge property bordered by property already owned by Andrew Bordman.

Deed of sale, 1769 April 8

Handwritten deed between a committee of the Proprietors of the Cambridge Common lands comprised of Samuel Danforth, Samuel Whittemore, Henry Prentice, Ebenezer Stedman, and Edward Marret to grantee Andrew Bordman for a strip of Cambridge common land.

Deed of sale, 1788 September 10

Deed between grantor Abraham Bailey of Tewksbury and grantees Andrew Bordman IV and William Symonds both of Tweksbury for a piece of land and a building in Tewksbury.

Saving the Monopsony: Exclusivity, Innovation and Market Power in the Media Sector. Research Papers in Law, 7/2006

From the Introduction. The Media Sector has experienced a technological revolution in the last 15 years. Digital encoding of television signals made possible a more efficient use of the radiospectrum. Digital terrestrial television (hereinafter, “DTT”) allows now for the reception of a significant number of free-to-air channels.1 Moreover, the use of new transmission platforms (hereinafter,“platforms”), namely cable and direct-to-home satellite (hereinafter, “DTH”) paved the way for the arrival in Europe of pay-TV operators, which finance their activities mainly via subscription fees. This changing technological landscape is subject to further evolution in the near future, as incumbent telecommunications operators become increasingly interested in making available broadcasting content2 as part of their broadband offer and 3G mobile handsets can be used for the reception of TV signals....The present paper seeks to ascertain whether the Commission “regulatory approach” towards the exclusive sale of premium content is a sound one, in particular in view of the constant technological evolution outlined above. The assumptions underlying landmark Commission decisions will be compared with recent developments of the media sector in Italy. In the NewsCorp./Telepiù case, decided in 2003, the Commission imposed very strict conditions to allow the merger giving birth to Sky Italia, on the assumption that the operation created a lasting near-monopsony in the different upstream markets for the acquisition of premium intervened against the media conglomerate Mediaset (which controls, inter alia, the main three private free-to-air channels in Italy) for an alleged abuse of dominant position.17 In fact, and contrary to the forecasts made by the Commission, Mediaset was in a position to acquire the broadcasting rights of the main Italian football teams, thereby excluding the incumbent (and near-monopolist) pay-TV operator, Sky Italia. This may go to show that the reality of the sector is more complex and evolves faster than one may infer from the Commission practice, thus putting into question its stance regarding exclusivity. The experience of the evolution of the Italian media sector will be used as the starting point for the evaluation of alternative regulatory options.

Trade and geopolitics: should the EU engage with the Eurasian Economic Union? EPC Policy Brief, 2 April 2015

In an effort to find a solution to the deteriorating relationship between the EU and Russia, various commentators, policy-makers and experts have suggested that the EU should seriously consider engaging with the Eurasian Economic Union, as part of a new ‘grand bargain’ between Russia and the EU. If Ukraine will no longer be forced to choose between two integrating regimes, so the argument goes, Russian sensibilities can be pacified, which will in turn, hopefully, lead to peace in eastern Ukraine. However, according to Rilka Dragneva and Kataryna Wolczuk, these arguments are based on a number of problematic assumptions about integration dynamics in the eastern neighbourhood. In this Policy Brief, they recommend the EU better think twice before further engaging with the EEU.

To know or not to know: collection and use of racial and ethnic data in Federal assistance programs; a report.

Prepared by Cynthia Norris Graae, Program analyst, Office of Federal Civil Rights Evaluation.

Educational attainment in the United States, March 1979 and 1978 /

Mode of access: Internet.

U.S. immigration policy and the national interest /

Originally published March 1981 as U.S. immigration policy ... final report and recommendations of the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy.

Language minority, illiteracy, and voting data used in making determinations for the Voting rights act amendments of 1975 (Public law 94-73).

Item 142-C

U.S. policy toward Panama, 1903-present : questions of recognition and diplomatic relations and instances of U.S. intervention.

"Reprint from the Department of State Bulletin, April 22, 1974. Research Project no. 1066c (Revised)."