996 resultados para United States. Department of the Treasury. Financial Management Service.


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes bibliographical references.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Continuation of the Publication with Same Title, Issued by the Bureau of Statistics [treasury Dept]; by the Bureau of Statistics [dept. of Commerce and Labor]; by the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce [dept. of Commerce and Labor; Later Dept. of Commerce]

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

At head of title: U.S. Department of commerce ... Bureau of the census ...

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Printed for the use of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry."

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vol. for 1956 issued as U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Miscellaneous publication no. 722; 1957- as U.S. Agricultural Marketing Service, Service and regulatory announcement no. 177.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Description based on: 1960.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"A United States Department of Commerce publication."

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Turtle excluder devices (TEDs) are being trialed on a voluntary basis in many Australian prawn (shrimp) trawl fisheries to reduce sea turtle captures. Analysis of TED introductions into shrimp trawl fisheries of the United States provided major insights into why conflicts occurred between shrimpers, conservationists, and government agencies. A conflict over the introduction and subsequent regulation of TEDs occurred because the problem and the solution were perceived differently by the various stakeholders. Attempts to negotiate and mediate the conflict broke down, resulting in litigation against the U.S. government by conservationists and shrimpers. Litigation was not an efficient resolution to the sea turtle-TED-trawl conflict but it appears that litigation was the only remaining path of resolution once the issue became polarized. We review two major Australian trawl fisheries to identify any significant differences in circumstances that may affect TED acceptance. Australian trawl fisheries are structured differently and good communication occurs between industry and researchers. TEDs are being introduced as mature technology. Furthermore, bycatch issues are of increasing concern to all stakeholders. These factors, combined with insights derived from previous conflicts concerning TEDs in the United Stares, increase the possibilities that TEDs will be introduced to Australian fishers with better acceptance.