Ancient Pemaquid: an historical review /

Also issued separately.

School of Nursing Class of 1987

Top Row: Douglas G. Pointon, Anne M. Laliberte, Anne T. Reaume, Karen R. Anderson, Margaret A. Mehall, Laura Meintel(Cepko), Sharon M. Milberger, Felicia I. Kle??, Pamela J. DcKeyser, Kathryn G. Maudlin, Mary C. Downey, Julie A. Gergen, Anne K. Hubling, Helen Mourao, Deborah L. Dubrul, Sarah E. Whorf

Row 2: Andrea Mitchell, Karen E. Grost, Paula V. Nersesian, Kelly A. Fleming, Mary Beth Morton, Lynda L. Cooley, Cynthia A. Wandzel, Deborah L. Bach, Karen A. Schwartz, Rhonda G. Pasma, Lesley M. Shafer, Michelle A. Kauer, Mary Jo Raftery, Carol A. Hammell, Josephine G. Ratcliffe

Row 3: Shon A. Pilarski, Julie S. Peritz, Terri L. McPherson, Tina T. chandler, Janet C. Pinkerton, Rosanna M. Knapp, Lisa A. Krukowski, Madelyn L. Nichols, Jaleh Shafii, Elizabeth A. Beer, Molly A. Finn, Dyann E. Botsford, Kathryn J. Meier, Angela L. Bruder (Crane), Herlinda Olive-Downs, Laura B. Bailey

Row 4: Laura L. Brooks, Lisa K. Feezell

Row 5: Cindy L. Harvey, Kerri A. Bacsanyi, Diane R. Cepko, Sheila E. Falk, Marylin A. Jeromin, Marianne Gerard, Sharon L. Podeszwa, Lynette A. LaPratt, Mary Ann Williams, Diana L. Faulk, Christine L. Henriksen, Sharon M. LaMacchia

Row 6: Deborah A. ranazzi (Maxim), Debra J. Mitchell, Holly B. O'Brien, Elaine K. Hebda, Jeanne L. Bruff, Crystal M. Emery, Cleola Hinton, Kathleen T. Hutton, Holly L. Nelson, Karen F. Kraker

Row 7: Meghan A. Sweeney, Christine M. Olree, Marlynn J. Marroso, Toni L. Lowery, Catherine L. Carroll, Elisabeth A. Pennington, Shake Ketefian, Rhetaugh G. Dumas, Janice B. Lindberg, Marlene Rutledge, Kimberley A. Vnuk, Anne M. Walsh, Rae Ann Vander Weide, Cheryl L. Boyd

Row 8: Renee M. Marks, Janine M. Simon, Renee A. Bowles, Linda Kurpinski-Nabozny, Teresa E. Ohman, Joanna E. Bok, Jodi F. Siegel, Janeen M. Chebli, Susan M. Williamson, Mary M. Fedewa, Rose Marie Stacey, Angela J. DeWitt, Kim E. Whelan, Lyndall P. Miller

Row 9: Jean M. Dziurgot, Amy J. Elwart, Lorrie A. Sheck, Amy A. Plasman, Mary L. Schuette, Susan K. Bowen, Heather A. Woodward, Luann N. Richert, Laurie J. Schlukebir, Linda L. Stevenson(Said), Carolyn N. Hartke, Rebecca L. Evans, Kathryn A. Savage, Kathryn A. Sailus (Linden), Heidi Deininger, Jennifer J. Eppley

School of Nursing Class of 2011

Top Row: Dereje Amente, Grace Baek, Anne Benitez, Anna Berry-Krumrey, Amber Blake, Daniela Bravo-Corona, Shelley Brenner, Melissa Butzky, Ann Cassel, Chantal Chin, Mee-Sook Choo, Stephanie Clapham, Kathryn Clark, Joseph Cleary, Stephanie Conn, Casie Cook

Row 2: Christina Cook, Jessica Cook, Renea Cox, Marissa DaSilva, Kathryn Davenport, Ashley Deford, Alyse DeHaan, Maria Didio, Alyssa Diroff, Amy Doenitz, Emily Domansky, Deanna Dong, Ross Drake, Brian Dulzo, Michelle Dwyer, Jill Eberly, Rachel Escobar, Kathryn Falvey

Row 3: Michelle Fauver, Paula Fe Francisco, Lindsey Frick, Amannda Casper, Ashley Pickett, Kristin Kingma, Thomas Donnelly, Danielle Besk, Kimberly Cristobal, Heather Erdmann, Jessica Kramer, Ana Kotsogiannis, Sarah Bloom, Anna Evola, Melissa Dulic, Anna Garcia, Christopher Gargala, Thomas Geigert

Row 4: Megan Giles, Kristen Gniewkowski, Alexandra Gold, Sarah Gorzalski, Michele Grabow, Amber Gramling, Hannah Gregerson, Maria Hegan, Wendy Hastings, Ahsley Hayner

Row 5: Leanne Heilig, Lauryn Hildensperger, Rachel Hollern, Laura Jean Howatt, Eve Jaehnen, Stephanie Johnson, Peter Kachur, Rachelle Kilburg, Rachel Klein, Sara Klok, Caitlyn Kochanski, Valerie Kotal

Row 6: Lidia Kraft, Allison Kruger, Omotara Kufeji, Jill Kuhlman, Karah Kurdys, Kathryn Lang, Elsa Lindquist, Sara Mangus, Kathryn Marten, Samantha Maskell, Lauren McBride, Kelly McCarley

Row 7: Rachel McClure, Angela McCracken, Mallory Missad, Kathleen Murray, Mariko Nakagawa, Jaclyn Nancekivell, Tracey Negrelli, Kathleen Potempa, Bonnie Hagerty, Healee On, Sarah Osentoski, Kelsey Owens, Kelly Paulisin, Amanda Phillips, Emily Pressley, Kaitlyn Radius

Row 8: Rebecca Reits, Elin Ridenour, Amanda Robbins, Chayla Robles, Jessica Roossien, Alyssa Roy, Leslie Russell, Kristen Ruster, Cynthia Scheuher, Julie Schramm, Kim Schroers, Jennifer Schwartz, Kelly Seestedt, Shannon shank, Andrea Sherzer, Lauren Sir, Erinn Smith, Kathleen Soedarjatno

Row 9: Jessica Stefko, Alexandra Stencel, Brianne Stowell, Alexandra Suseland, Lauren Taylor, Deborah Thornton, Amanda Timmer, Daniel Tjarks, Jillian Traskos, Graham Valley, Sarah Wade, Rachel Wagner, Drew Wakefield, Marlena Westerlund, Katie Wheelock, Jennifer Wilcox, Dana York

Report to the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority on a monorail rapid transit line for Los Angeles, January 15, 1954.

Part of the illustrative material is fold., part col.

Mother West Wind "how" stories,

Series list on p. [ii].

Die schmelzpunkte anorganischer salze.

Thesis (doctoral)--

Uber die alkalisalze des hydroperoxyds in wasseriger losung.

Thesis (doctoral)--

The life of Whitelaw Reid /

I. Journalism, war, politics -- II. Politics, diplomacy.

The British flora, or, Genera and species of British plants : arranged after the reformed sexual system : and illustrated by numerous tables, and dissections /

Collation: v.1: [2], x, 120 p.; v.2: 138, [2] p. (last leaf blank); v.3: 126, [2] p. (last leaf blank); v.4: 100 p.; v.5: 52 p.; v.6: (atlas): 347 leaves of plates.

Formic acid mixing ratio (CIMS) and 3D wind data, plus SOSAA model runs -- Hyytiälä, Finland, Apr-Jun 2014

These are data of eddy covariance flux measurements of formic acid (HCOOH), performed by a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) over a boreal forest canopy in Hyytiälä, Finland, in spring/summer 2014. Results from the 1-D chemical transport model runs using SOSAA (Simulate Organic vapours, Sulphuric Acid and Aerosols) are included as well. The data accompany a submission of a manuscript to Geophysical Research Letters for consideration for publication (Schobesberger et al.).

Australian microhylid frogs (Cophixalus and Austrochaperina): phylogeny, taxonomy, calls, distributions and breeding biology

Despite a considerable surge in herpetological research in Australia over the last couple of decades the Australian microhylid frogs (Cophixalus and Austrochaperina) remain relatively poorly known. Herein I present the results of extensive fieldwork and molecular, morphological and call analysis with the aim of resolving taxonomy, call variation and distributions, and increasing our understanding of breeding biology. Analysis of 943 base pairs of mitochondrial 16S rRNA and 12S rRNA provides a well supported phylogeny that is largely consistent with current taxonomy. Levels of divergence between species are substantial and significant phylogeographic structuring is evident in C. ornatus, C. neglectus and C. aenigma, sp. nov. The description of C. concinnus was based on a mixed collection of two species from Thornton Peak and a new species is described to resolve this. C. aenigma, sp. nov., is described from high-elevation (>750 m) rainforest across the Carbine, Thornton, Finnigan and Bakers Blue Mountain uplands, north-east Queensland. C. concinnus is redescribed as a highly distinct species restricted to rainforest and boulder fields at the summit of Thornton Peak (>1100 m). Despite protection in Daintree National Park in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, predictions of the impact of global warming suggest C. concinnus to be of very high conservation concern ( Critically Endangered, IUCN criteria). The mating call of two species ( C. mcdonaldi and C. exiguus) is described for the first time and high levels of call variation within C. ornatus, C. neglectus, C. hosmeri, C. aenigma and Austrochaperina fryi are presented. Such variation is often attributable to genetically divergent lineages, altitudinal variation and courtship; however, in some instances ( particularly within C. hosmeri) the source or function of highly distinct calls at a site remains obscure. Molecular, morphological and call analyses allow the clarification of species distributions, especially in the northern mountains of the Wet Tropics. Notes are presented on the breeding biology of C. aenigma, C. bombiens, C. concinnus, C. exiguus, C. infacetus, C. mcdonaldi, C. monticola, C. neglectus, C. ornatus and C. saxatilis, which are largely consistent with previous accounts: small terrestrial clutches usually attended by a male. Courtship behaviour in C. ornatus is described and the first records of multiple clutching in Australian microhylids are presented (for C. ornatus and C. infacetus).

Pubovaginal sling versus transurethral Macroplastique for stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a prospective randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare the pubovaginal sling and transurethral Macroplastique in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). Design A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing two surgical treatments for SUI and ISD. Setting Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit in Australia. Population Women with SUI and ISD who were suitable for either surgical technique. Methods Forty-five women with SUI and ISD were randomly allocated the pubovaginal sling (n = 22) or transurethral Macroplastique (n = 23). Subjective and objective success rates, patient satisfaction and cost measurements at six months and one year following surgery were the primary outcome measures. A telephone questionnaire survey was performed at a mean follow up period of 62 months (43-71). Main outcome measure Comparison of success rates, complications and costs. Results The symptomatic and patient satisfaction success rates were similar following the sling and Macroplastique with the objective success rate being significantly greater (P < 0.001) following the sling (81% vs 9%). Macroplastique had significantly lower morbidity but was more expensive than the sling (P < 0.001). Response rate at 62 months follow up was 60% in both groups with the sling group reporting better continence success (69% vs 21%) and satisfaction rates (69% vs 29%, P = 0.057). Conclusions The pubovaginal sling was more effective and economical than transurethral Macroplastique for the treatment of SUI and ISD. However, transurethral Macroplastique remains an appropriate treatment in selected cases of SUI and ISD.