À travers les expériences canadiennes en matière d’industries minières, les leçons à tirer pour Madagascar pour bâtir une croissance économique sans grande répercussion sur l’environnement.

L’essor économique se fait au gré de l’environnement et du développement social de la population. Le concept de « développement durable » a été discuté pour la première fois lors du Sommet de la terre à Rio de Janeiro (Brésil) en 1992. Ce concept consiste à concilier la protection de l’environnement et la croissance économique. La compagnie minière canadienne Osisko met en œuvre le projet aurifère « Canadian Malartic » au Québec. Ce projet suscite des controverses au sein de la population locale. En effet, elle craigne des effets néfastes de cette exploitation d’or sur leur environnement et leur bien-être. Analogiquement, le gouvernement malagasy a accordé l’exploitation du site Ambatovy pour l’extraction des minerais de nickel et de cobalt à des firmes multinationales. Ce site minier est situé au cœur de la forêt humide du versant Est de Madagascar, qui figure dans la liste du patrimoine naturel mondial en péril selon l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’Éducation, la Science et la Culture (UNESCO). Les gouvernements québécois et malagasy veulent harmoniser les règles juridiques de la protection environnementale avec celles de l’exploitation des ressources naturelles pour accomplir leurs « développements durables ». Pour ce faire, ils devraient favoriser la prise de décision décentralisée et la collaboration de toutes les parties intéressées, surtout lors de l’examen de l’évaluation environnementale des projets miniers. Ils devraient s’assurer aussi de l’application des engagements social et environnemental des entreprises minières durant l’exploitation. Enfin, ces gouvernements devraient renforcer l’exigence de l’assainissement des sites miniers à la fin de l’exploitation minière.

The transformation of earth-system observations into information of socio-economic value in GEOSS

The Group on Earth Observations System of Systems, GEOSS, is a co-ordinated initiative by many nations to address the needs for earth-system information expressed by the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development. We discuss the role of earth-system modelling and data assimilation in transforming earth-system observations into the predictive and status-assessment products required by GEOSS, across many areas of socio-economic interest. First we review recent gains in the predictive skill of operational global earth-system models, on time-scales of days to several seasons. We then discuss recent work to develop from the global predictions a diverse set of end-user applications which can meet GEOSS requirements for information of socio-economic benefit; examples include forecasts of coastal storm surges, floods in large river basins, seasonal crop yield forecasts and seasonal lead-time alerts for malaria epidemics. We note ongoing efforts to extend operational earth-system modelling and assimilation capabilities to atmospheric composition, in support of improved services for air-quality forecasts and for treaty assessment. We next sketch likely GEOSS observational requirements in the coming decades. In concluding, we reflect on the cost of earth observations relative to the modest cost of transforming the observations into information of socio-economic value.

Think local, act local? Issues of co-ordination and integration in Local Agenda 21

The political response to the complex package of environmental problems which threaten the future of our planet has been to introduce a new agenda of environmental action based on the principles of sustainability and subsidiarity. This has been crystallised in world agreements signed at the Earth Summit in Rio. One of these, Agenda 21, calls for the governments and communities of the world to prepare action plans for their areas which can build consensus between the various stakeholder groups and feed the principles of sustainable development back into their policies and day-to-day practices. This paper explores the experience of Local Agenda 21 type processes at three levels in the South East of England: the regional, county (sub-regional) and local level. In particular it undertakes a critical appraisal of the success of these participatory and consensus-building exercises in developing an integrated and co-ordinated approach to environmental action planning. It concludes that, although much useful work has been done in raising awareness and modifying policy and practice, there are significant cultural and institutional barriers which are hindering progress.

The sustainability of development in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and opportunities

Includes bibliography

Sustainable human settlements development in Latin America and the Caribbean

Includes bibliography

Report of the first meeting of the focal points appointed by the governments of the signatory countries of the declaration on the application of principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, 6 and 7 November 2012

Incluye Bibliografía

Report of the second meeting of the focal points appointed by the governments of the signatory countries of the declaration on the application of principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, Guadalajara, Mexico, 16 and 17 April 2013

Incluye Bibliografía

A educação e a sustentabilidade: o desafio de um paradigma e a década da educação para o desenvolvimento sustentável da UNESCO (2005-2014)

This paper aims at proposing a discussion on the role of education in a pragmatic plot. It intends to offer some contributions to the consolidation in the essence of sustainable development and of a contextualized sustainability as well as its respective dimensions. Therefore, some conceptual evolutions of such expressions and the implications for when they are being used, especially parallel to the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, UNESCO (2005-2014) are presented. This paper also intends to promote some reflection on how much environmental and general education are important with regard to the challenge of multidimensional balance proposed, as seen from the perspective of a paradigm that has been constantly shaped since the Stockholm Conference of 1972, going through the given contributions in 1992 by The Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro – Eco 92 / Rio 92; and from there to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, of Rio+20, in 2012.