Identification of promising antigenic components in latent fingermark residues

An analysis of latent fingermark residues by Sodium-Dodecyl-Sulfate PolyAcrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by silver staining allowed the detection of different proteins, from which two major bands, corresponding to proteins of 56 and 64 kDa molecular weight, could be identified. Two other bands, corresponding to proteins of 52 and 48 kDa were also visualizable along with some other weaker bands of lower molecular weights. In order to identify these proteins, three antibodies directed against human proteins were tested on western blots of fingermarks residues: anti-keratin 1 and 10 (K1/10), anti-cathepsin-D (Cat.D) and anti-dermcidin (Derm.). The corresponding antigens are known to be present in the stratum corneum of desquamating stratified epithelium (K1/10, Cat.D) and/or in eccrine sweat (Cat.D, Derm.). The two major bands were identified as consistent with keratin 1 and 10. The pro-form and the active form of the cathepsin-D have also been identified from two other bands. Dermcidin could not be detected in the western blot. In addition, these antibodies have been tested on latent fingermarks left on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, as well as on whitened and non-whitened paper. The detection of fingermarks was successful with all three antibodies.

Changes of MAP2 phosphorylation during brain development.

The microtubule-associated protein MAP2 is essential for development of early neuronal morphology and maintenance of adult neuronal morphology. Several splice variants exist, MAP2a-d, with a lack of MAP2a in cat brain. MAP2 is widely used as a neuronal marker. In this study we compared five monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against MAP2. They show differences in the immunocytochemical distribution of MAP2 isoforms during development of the visual cortex and cerebellum of the cat. Local and temporal differences were seen with MAb AP18, an antibody directed against a phosphorylation-dependent epitope near the N-terminal end. In large pyramidal dendrites in visual cortex, the AP18 epitope remained in parts immunoreactive after treatment with alkaline phosphatase. Three MAbs, AP14, MT-01, and MT-02, recognized the central region of the MAP2b molecule, which is not present in MAP2c and 2d, and reacted with phosphorylation-independent epitopes. During the first postnatal week the immunostaining in cerebellum differed between antibodies in that some cellular elements in external and internal granular layers and Purkinje cells were stained to various degrees, whereas at later stages staining patterns were similar. At early stages, antibody MT-02 stained cell bodies and dendrites in cerebral cortex and cerebellum. With progressing maturation, immunoreactivity became restricted to distal parts of apical dendrites of pyramidal cells and was absent from perikarya and finer proximal dendrites in cortex. MT-02 did not stain MAP2 in cerebellum of adult animals. This study demonstrates that the immunocytochemical detection of MAP2 depends on modifications such as phosphorylation and conformational changes of the molecule, and that MAP2 staining patterns differ between MAbs. Phosphorylation and specific conformations in the molecule may be essential for modulating function and molecular stability of MAP2, and monoclonal antibodies against such sites may provide tools for studying the functional role of modifications.

Penser un modèle de complémentarité de trois épreuves projectives (Hand-Test, Rorschach et TAT) dans une perspective psychodynamique : un défi méthodologique et épistémologique

L'idée de complémentarité de certaines épreuves projectives s'est dessinée dès les années 1960, telles que Rorschach - test du Village, Rorschach - CAT et enfin Rorschach - TAT. L'essentiel des dispositifs projectifs mobilise les épreuves de Rorschach et de TAT dont la complémentarité a été largement pointée, notamment, par Anzieu et Chabert (1983), Chabert (1998), Roman (2006, 2007, 2009) et Emmanuelli et Azoulay (2001, 2008, 2009). Les épreuves de Hand-Test, Rorschach et TAT opèrent selon des dynamiques différentes à partir de consignes, sorte d'« injonction à imaginer » (Roman, 2008). Le défi méthodologique et épistémologique est d'envisager une complémentarité entre ces trois épreuves projectives, complémentarité qui ne va pas de soi dans la mesure où le Hand-Test a été pensé à partir du modèle de l'Analyse Structurale, le Rorschach et le TAT dans une perspective psychodynamique. L'enjeu du défi est de parvenir à se dégager du modèle de l'Analyse Structurale, d'une dimension déterministe et inscrire le Hand-Test dans une dimension processuelle d'une part, et de croiser ces trois épreuves afin de parvenir à mettre en avant les ressources du sujet quant à l'émergence de potentialités de transformations bien souvent, trop souvent, reléguées au second plan, voire négligées, lors de la prise en charge institutionnelle d'autre part. Ainsi, l'approche de la complémentarité des épreuves se trouve au service d'une compréhension de l'évolution du rapport à l'agir chez les adolescents. L'écart qui se donne à voir entre la conception des épreuves projectives envisagées dans une perspective psychodynamique et la manière d'appréhender le Hand-Test constitue le défi méthodologique et épistémologique que nous proposons de discuter.