A novel trust measurement method based on certified belief in strength for a multi-agent classifier system

A novel trust measurement method, namely, certified belief in strength (CBS), for a multi-agent classifier system (MACS) is proposed in this paper. The CBS method aims to improve the performance of the constituent agents of the MACS, viz., the fuzzy min-max (FMM) neural network classifier. Trust measurement is accomplished using reputation and strength of the constituent agents. Trust is built from strong elements that are associated with the FMM agents, allowing the CBS method to improve the performance of the MACS. An auction procedure based on the sealed bid, namely, the first price method, is adopted for the MACS in determining the winning agent. The effectiveness of the CBS method and the bond (based on trust) is verified by using a number of benchmark data sets. The results demonstrate that the proposed MACS-CBS model is able to produce better accuracy and stability as compared with those from other existing methods. © 2012 Springer-Verlag London.

E-commerce trust management system reliability

Various solutions have been proposed in managing trust relationship between trading partners in eCommerce environment. Determine the reliability of trust management systems in eCommerce is most difficult issue due to highly dynamic nature of eCommerce environments. As trust management systems depend on the feedback ratings provided by the trading partners, they are fallible to strategic manipulation of the feedback ratings attacks. This paper addressed the challenges of trust management systems. The requirements of a reliable trust management are also discussed. In particular, we introduce an adaptive credibility model that distinguishes between credible feedback ratings and malicious feedback ratings by considering transaction size, frequency of ratings and majority vote to form a feedback ratings verification metric. The approach has been validated by simulation result.

Securing recommendations in grouped P2P e-commerce trust model

In dynamic peer to peer (P2P) e-commerce, it is an important and difficult problem to promote online businesses without sacrificing the desired trust to secure transactions. In this paper, we address malicious threats in order to guarantee secrecy and integrity of recommendations exchanged among peers in P2P e-commerce. In addition to trust, secret keys are required to be established between each peer and its neighbors. Further, we propose a key management approach gkeying to generate six types of keys. Our work mainly focuses on key generation for securing recommendations, and ensuring the integrity of recommendations. The proposed approach presented with a security and performance analysis, is more secure and more efficient in terms of communication cost, computation cost, storage cost, and feasibility. © 2012 IEEE.

The soft systems approach to understanding trust in alliances in Australia

Alliances are complex projects with high levels of risk and uncertainty. Despite the pain share and gain share commercial arrangement in alliances, Trust is still an issue between the Alliancing Leadership Team (ALT) and Alliancing Management Team relationship (AMT). Although the concept and components of trust have been discussed by various researchers, the characteristic of trust under different situations has not been tested within the procurement research domain. Based on semi-structured interviews with the members of the ALT and AMT of an alliance project in Australia the underlying trust based relationships between the AMT and ALT were investigated using the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). Results demonstrate that cognitive, affect, system and cognitive-affect based trust are mediated by common good, needs, sharing, breach temptation and mishap situations. This research demonstrates that the adversarial culture of the Australian construction industry cannot be changed by the implementation of trust principles alone. The culture of suspicion dominating the ideological view of the construction industry requires organizational learning between alliance parties to execute appropriate behaviours, aligned with the alliancing philosophy, to effectively achieve ideal collaboration.

Trust evaluation for indirectly connected nodes using link community information

Inspired by recent empirical research on link communities, we borrow some important ideas and concepts for our own research to provide a more reasonable computation model of transitive trust. The key advantages of using link community methodology is to reflect on the nature of the social network features of Hierarchy and Overlap. Our research mainly resolves the computation of trust transitivity in which two nodes do not have any direct links to any link community. In this research, we discover a new direction analyzing trust transitivity. By using a social network game, we found that the link community methodology is a natural way to analyze trust in social networks. We also discovered, even in a small social network, trust has certain community features.

Trust in strategic alliances: what does it mean and how is it built?

Informed by social exchange theory (SET) this study examines the role of trust in strategic alliances. Interviews were conducted with 17 participants who were strategic alliance managers in their organization. The study finds that trust is important to strategic alliance managers, and without it alliance managers would find it difficult to keep their alliance going. Trust is built over time, and based on the past experiences that the alliance manager has with their partner. The study found that prior networks, timely and appropriate communication and information exchange, fairness preservation and inter-firm adaptation were important in developing trust in the strategic alliance.

Cooperative and competitive structures of trust relations in teams

This article argues that it is not just trust-generating but also trust-inhibiting mechanisms that operate in teams, and that these cooperative and competitive structures of interpersonal relations of trust within teams may affect team performance. Specifically, we propose that the presence of trust-generating structures (e.g., reciprocity, trusting in the referrals of others we trust, trusting in high performers and more experienced people) and the absence of trust-inhibiting structures (e.g., not trusting in the referrals of others we trust) are more likely to be associated with successful teams. Using exponential random graph models, a particular class of statistical model for social networks, we examine three professional sporting teams from the Australian Football League for the presence and absence of these mechanisms of interpersonal relations of trust. Quantitative network results indicate a differential presence of these postulated structures of trust relations in line with our hypotheses. Qualitative comparisons of these quantitative findings with team performance measures suggest a link between trust-generating and trust-inhibiting mechanisms of trust and team performance. Further theorization on other trust-inhibiting structures of trust relations and related empirical work is likely to shed further light on these connections.