Representative analyses of pre-tectonic metabasic rocks and metapelitic gneiss from Sverdrupfjella, East Antarctica

Extensive high-grade polydeformed metamorphic provinces surrounding Archaean cratonic nuclei in the East Antarctic Shield record two tectono-thermal episodes in late Mesoproterozoic and late Neoproterozoic-Cambrian times. In Western Dronning Maud Land, the high-grade Mesoproterozoic Maud Belt is juxtaposed against the Archaean Grunehogna Province and has traditionally been interpreted as a Grenvillian mobile belt that was thermally overprinted during the Early Palaeozoic. Integration of new U-Pb sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe and conventional single zircon and monazite age data, and Ar-Ar data on hornblende and biotite, with thermobarometric calculations on rocks from the H.U. Sverdrupfjella, northern Maud Belt, resulted in a more complex P-T-t evolution than previously assumed. A c. 540?Ma monazite, hosted by an upper ampibolite-facies mineral assemblage defining a regionally dominant top-to-NW shear fabric, provides strong evidence for the penetrative deformation in the area being of Pan-African age and not of Grenvillian age as previously reported. Relics of an eclogite-facies garnet-omphacite assemblage within strain-protected mafic boudins indicate that the peak metamorphic conditions recorded by most rocks in the area (T = 687-758°C, P = 9·4-11·3?kbar) were attained subsequent to decompression from P > 12·9?kbar. By analogy with limited U-Pb single zircon age data and on circumstantial textural grounds, this earlier eclogite-facies metamorphism is ascribed to subduction and accretion around 565?Ma. Post-peak metamorphic K-metasomatism under amphibolite-facies conditions is ascribed to the intrusion of post-orogenic granite at c. 480?Ma. The recognition of extensive Pan-African tectonism in the Maud Belt casts doubts on previous Rodinia reconstructions, in which this belt takes a pivotal position between East Antarctica, the Kalahari Craton and Laurentia. Evidence of late Mesoproterozoic high-grade metamorphism during the formation of the Maud Belt exists in the form of c. 1035?Ma zircon overgrowths that are probably related to relics of granulite-facies metamorphism recorded from other parts of the Maud Belt. The polymetamorphic rocks are largely derived from a c. 1140?Ma volcanic arc and 1072 ± 10?Ma granite.

Radium concentration in water samples from the Northeast Atlantic

We present field measurements of air-sea gas exchange by the radon deficit method that were carried out during JASIN 1978 (NE Atlantic) and FGGE 1979 (Equatorial Atlantic). Both experiments comprised repeated deficit measurements at fixed position over periods of days or longer, using a previously descibed precise and fast-acquiaition, automatic radon measuring system. The deficit time series exhibit variations that only partly reflect the expected changes in gas transfer. By evaluating averages over each time series we deduce the following gas transfer velocities (average wind velocity and water temperature in parentheses): JASIN phase 1: 1.6 ± 0.8 m/d (at ~6 m/s, 13°C) JASIN phase 2: 4.3 ± 1.2 m/d (at ~8 m/s, 13°C) FGGE: 1.2 ± 0.4 m/d (at ~5 m/s, 28°C) 0.9 ± 0.4 m/d (at ~7 m/s, 28°C) 1.5 ± 0.4 m/d (at ~7 m/s, 28°C) The large difference betwen the JASIN phase 2 and FGGE values despite quite similare average wind velocity becomes even larger when the values are, however, fully compatible with the range of gas transfer velocities observed in laboratory experiments and the conclusion is suggested that their difference is caused by the highly different wind variability in JASIN and FGGE. We conclude that in gas exchange parameterization it is not sufficinent to consider wind velocity only. A comparison of our observations with laboratory results outlines the range of variations of air-sea gas transfer velocities with wind velocity and sea state. We also reformulate the radon deficit method, in the light of our observed deficit variations, to account explicitely for non-stationary and horizontal inhomogeneity in previous radon work introduces considerable uncertainty in deduced gas transfere velocity. We furthermore discuss the observational rewuirements that have to be met for an adequate exploitation of the radon deficit method, of which an observation area of minimum horizontal inhomogeneity and monitoring of the remaining inhomogeneities are thought to be the most stringent ones.