The inner life of the religious societies of the commonwealth: considered principally with reference to the influence of church organization on the spread of Christianity.

Includes bibliographical references.

Colonization : a study of the founding of new societies /

Bibliography: p. 599-611.

Proceedings of the National Association of Commissioners, Secretaries and Directors of Agriculture 1916-1955 : including the organization of the National Association, Proceedings from the regional organizations, organization of the State Departments of Agriculture, and a review of the early related agricultural agencies and societies/

Bibliography: p. 493.

The Ottomans in Europe; or, Turkey in the present crisis, with the secret societies' maps.

Mode of access: Internet.

Transactions of the Agricultural Societies in the State of Maine

1855 Has Title: Report of the Secretary of the Maine Agricultural Society, and Transactions of the Several County Agricultural Societies

In the tracks of the trades; the account of a fourteen thousand mile yachting cruise to the Hawaiis, Marquesas, Societies, Samoas and Fijis,

Mode of access: Internet.

Report giving the Names of Insurance Companies and Fraternal Societies authorized to do Business in Florida, with a Statement of their Financial Condition and Transactions

Mode of access: Internet.

The claims of the Negro, ethnologically considered. : An address before the literary societies of Western Reserve College, at commencement, July 12, 1854. /

Last page blank.

Annual Administration Report on the Working of Cooperative Societies

Title Varies: Annual Report on the Working of the Cooperative Societies

Mixed-charge copolymer as environmentally friendly low fouling marine coatings

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

What is an aphasia-friendly environment?

Background: The provision of aphasia-friendly environments is important for reducing the disability experienced by people with aphasia. However, the term aphasia-friendly environment has yet to be explicitly defined in the literature. Aims. This review defines aphasia-friendly environments, critically evaluates the relevant literature. and highlights the gaps in research in this area. Main Contribution: The World Health Organisation's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (WHO, 2001) is Used as a framework for identifying the specific barriers and facilitators that need to be considered when creating an aphasia-friendly environment. Research focusing on Multiple ICF environmental factor domains is presented, followed by a review Of Studies that focus on specific environmental factor domains. Conclusions. More research identifying the range of environmental factors that may be important to consider when creating aphasia-friendly environments is required. In addition, further rigorous studies focusing on specific ICF environmental factor domains are needed.

The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: Spider societies as a test case

Many models have been advanced to suggest how different expressions of sociality have evolved and are maintained. However these models ignore the function of groups for the particular species in question. Here we present a new perspective on sociality where the function of the group takes a central role. We argue that sociality may have primarily a reproductive, protective, or foraging function, depending on whether it enhances the reproductive, protective or foraging aspect of the animal's life (sociality may serve a mixture of these functions). Different functions can potentially cause the development of the same social behaviour. By identifying which function influences a particular social behaviour we can determine how that social behaviour will change with changing conditions, and which models are most pertinent. To test our approach we examined spider sociality, which has often been seen as the poor cousin to insect sociality. By using our approach we found that the group characteristics of eusocial insects is largely governed by the reproductive function of their groups, while the group characteristics of social spiders is largely governed by the foraging function of the group. This means that models relevant to insects may not be relevant to spiders. It also explains why eusocial insects have developed a strict caste system while spider societies are more egalitarian. We also used our approach to explain the differences between different types of spider groups. For example, differences in the characteristics of colonial and kleptoparasitic groups can be explained by differences in foraging methods, while differences between colonial and cooperative spiders can be explained by the role of the reproductive function in the formation of cooperative spider groups. Although the interactions within cooperative spider colonies are largely those of a foraging society, demographic traits and colony dynamics are strongly influenced by the reproductive function. We argue that functional explanations help to understand the social structure of spider groups and therefore the evolutionary potential for speciation in social spiders.