823 resultados para Food service management
Resumo:
"B-259941"--P. 1.
Resumo:
"Issued May 1996."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"July 30, 1996"--Pt. 4.
Resumo:
"FMS 2000."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"February 1986"--Cover.
Resumo:
"November 1992"--Prelim. p.
Resumo:
"B-265839"--P. 1.
Resumo:
"B-275942"--P. 1.
Resumo:
Caption title.
Resumo:
Prepared for the use of the Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare and the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.
Resumo:
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06
Resumo:
There is public unease about food-related issues including food additives, food poisoning bacteria and GM ingredients. The public wants evidence of no risks, but all regulators can ever offer is no evidence of risk or evidence of a very small risk. The situation is complex because experts and non-experts can perceive the same risk in vastly different ways. The way in which the food industry manages crises and communicates risks will determine the public acceptance and success of new technologies such as GM foods and nanomaterials. There is a need for the food industry (including regulators and scientific experts) to sharpen up their risk communication skills to ensure that technical innovations are accepted by consumers, and crises such as food recalls do not undermine the public's confidence in the food industry. The AIFST has a key role to play in driving the risk communication process and allaying public unease about food-related issues.