960 resultados para Analyzing popular music


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 10 (1876-1877)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 15 (1879)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Suppl. 7-12 (1878)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 27 (1885)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 39 (1891)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 46 (1894-1895)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 3 (1873)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 13 (1878)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 38 (1890-1891)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

v. 9 (1876)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Wirtschaftswiss., Diss., 2008

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background: Heart transplant rejection originates slow and fragmented conduction. Signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) is a stratification method in the risk of rejection. Objective: To develop a risk score for rejection, using SAECG variables. Methods: We studied 28 transplant patients. First, we divided the sample into two groups based on the occurrence of acute rejection (5 with rejection and 23 without). In a second phase, we divided the sample considering the existence or not of rejection in at least one biopsy performed on the follow-up period (rejection pm1: 18 with rejection and 10 without). Results: On conventional ECG, the presence of fibrosis was the only criterion associated with acute rejection (OR = 19; 95% CI = 1.65-218.47; p = 0.02). Considering the rejection pm1, an association was found with the SAECG variables, mainly with RMS40 (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; p = 0.03) and LAS40 (OR = 1.06; 95% IC = 1.01-1.11; p = 0.03). We formulated a risk score including those variables, and evaluated its discriminative performance in our sample. The presence of fibrosis with increasing of LAS40 and decreasing of RMS40 showed a good ability to distinguish between patients with and without rejection (AUC = 0.82; p < 0.01), assuming a cutoff point of sensitivity = 83.3% and specificity = 60%. Conclusion: The SAECG distinguished between patients with and without rejection. The usefulness of the proposed risk score must be demonstrated in larger follow-up studies.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Informatik, Diss., 2015

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Fakultät für Mathematik, Dissertation, 2016