The performance of laboratory tests in the management of a large outbreak of orally transmitted Chagas disease

Orally transmitted Chagas disease (ChD), which is a well-known entity in the Brazilian Amazon Region, was first documented in Venezuela in December 2007, when 103 people attending an urban public school in Caracas became infected by ingesting juice that was contaminated with Trypanosoma cruzi. The infection occurred 45-50 days prior to the initiation of the sampling performed in the current study. Parasitological methods were used to diagnose the first nine symptomatic patients; T. cruzi was found in all of them. However, because this outbreak was managed as a sudden emergency during Christmas time, we needed to rapidly evaluate 1,000 people at risk, so we decided to use conventional serology to detect specific IgM and IgG antibodies via ELISA as well as indirect haemagglutination, which produced positive test results for 9.1%, 11.9% and 9.9% of the individuals tested, respectively. In other more restricted patient groups, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) provided more sensitive results (80.4%) than blood cultures (16.2%) and animal inoculations (11.6%). Although the classical diagnosis of acute ChD is mainly based on parasitological findings, highly sensitive and specific serological techniques can provide rapid results during large and severe outbreaks, as described herein. The use of these serological techniques allows prompt treatment of all individuals suspected of being infected, resulting in reduced rates of morbidity and mortality.

Iowa Department of Corrections Strategic Plan and Plan, Performance 2003

Annual Report, Strategic Plan and Performance Plan

Iowa Department of Management Agency Performance Plan

Agency Performance Plan

Strategic Plan Performance Indicators, 2002-2003

Stragtegic plan for Iowa State University

Strategic Plan Performance Indicators 2003-2004

Stragtegic plan for Iowa State University

Strategic Plan Performance Indicators, 2001-2002

Stragtegic plan for Iowa State University

Department of Management Performance Report, FY 2004

Agency Performance Report

Department of Management Performance Report, FY 2005

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Homeland Security & Emergency Management Division Performance Report, FY 2005

Agency Performance Report

Análise da performance organizacional: Proposta de um modelo do balanced scorecard para a avaliação do desempenho do comando da 1ª região militar

Esta pesquisa gira à volta da avaliação do desempenho organizacional com enfoque no sistema denominado Balanced Scorecard. Esta ferramenta, criada no início da década de noventa, por David Norton e Robert Kaplan, tem vindo a contagiar os gestores, e nos dias de hoje várias são as organizações que beneficiam dela para obter excelência. A primeira metodologia foi apresentada em mil novecentos e noventa e três (1993), constituída por oito etapas. No ano de mil novecentos e noventa e seis (1996), os autores desenvolveram uma nova metodologia, melhorada, composta por dez etapas. Começámos por fazer um levantamento teórico dos conceitos ligados a esta ferramenta, as suas vantagens e desvantagens, as fases da sua execução, os possíveis obstáculos ao seu sucesso e os frutos que poderão ser colhidos com a sua implementação. Através de uma proposta de implementação, escolhemos o Comando da 1ª Região Militar, para verificar quais serão os impactos na gestão desta organização. Do diagnóstico situacional efectuado com base em entrevistas, análise documental e observação, verificámos que a organização possui algumas insuficiências ao nível do desempenho de gestão, derivadas sobretudo da situação logística e financeira. Na construção do mapa estratégico, principal componente do Balanced scorecard, vimo-nos na necessidade de deslocar a perspectiva do cliente ou de mercado para o topo de configuração, devido à natureza do objecto negocial da organização em estudo. O modelo de avaliação de desempenho desenvolvido evidenciou a importância que a utilização deste sistema poderá ter na melhoria das actividades castrenses, sobretudo pelo aumento do nível de comunicação entre os subgrupos e a gestão de topo, neste caso, o Pessoal de Comando e as Pequenas Unidades, devido à natureza e qualidade das informações fornecidas pelo mapa estratégico. The aim of this study is to look at the organizational performance measurement system, with a special emphasis upon the so called Balanced Scorecard System. This tool, created at the beginning of the 1990’s by David Norton and Robert Kaplan, has been gaining the enthusiasm of administrator, and at the present time, several organizations are using it in the search for excellence. The first methodology was presented in 1993 and was formed by eight steps. In 1996, however, its creators developed an improved version of this methodology, now composed by ten steps. We start by doing a research of the theoretical concepts related to this tool, its advantages and disadvantages, the stages of its implementation, possible obstacles to its success, and the benefits that can come from its use. Based on an implementation proposal, we chose the First Military Command Region of Cape Verde to study the possible impacts of this system on the management of that Institution. From an investigation on the existent situation, based on interviews, analysis of documents and “in locus” observation, we realised that the institution shows some administrative insufficiencies, mainly due to its logistics and financial situation. In the building of the strategic map, the main component of the Balanced Scorecard System, we were obliged to move the perspective of the client or the market to the top of the configuration, because of the nature of the trading object of the institution being studied. The performance measurement model developed, clearly showed the importance that the implementation of this system might have on the improvement of the Military activities, mainly because of the improvement on the type of communication that can be established between the subgroups and the higher hierarchical levels, in this case, the Commander Staff and the lower Units, due to the type and quality of the information provided by the strategic map.

Iowa Department of Corrections Strategic Plan and Plan, Performance, 2007

Annual Report, Strategic Plan and Performance Plan

Iowa Department of Management Agency Performance Plan, 2007

Agency Performance Plan

Proving the performance of a new revenue management system

Revenue management (RM) is a complicated business process that can best be described ascontrol of sales (using prices, restrictions, or capacity), usually using software as a tool to aiddecisions. RM software can play a mere informative role, supplying analysts with formatted andsummarized data who use it to make control decisions (setting a price or allocating capacity fora price point), or, play a deeper role, automating the decisions process completely, at the otherextreme. The RM models and algorithms in the academic literature by and large concentrateon the latter, completely automated, level of functionality.A firm considering using a new RM model or RM system needs to evaluate its performance.Academic papers justify the performance of their models using simulations, where customerbooking requests are simulated according to some process and model, and the revenue perfor-mance of the algorithm compared to an alternate set of algorithms. Such simulations, whilean accepted part of the academic literature, and indeed providing research insight, often lackcredibility with management. Even methodologically, they are usually awed, as the simula-tions only test \within-model" performance, and say nothing as to the appropriateness of themodel in the first place. Even simulations that test against alternate models or competition arelimited by their inherent necessity on fixing some model as the universe for their testing. Theseproblems are exacerbated with RM models that attempt to model customer purchase behav-ior or competition, as the right models for competitive actions or customer purchases remainsomewhat of a mystery, or at least with no consensus on their validity.How then to validate a model? Putting it another way, we want to show that a particularmodel or algorithm is the cause of a certain improvement to the RM process compared to theexisting process. We take care to emphasize that we want to prove the said model as the causeof performance, and to compare against a (incumbent) process rather than against an alternatemodel.In this paper we describe a \live" testing experiment that we conducted at Iberia Airlineson a set of flights. A set of competing algorithms control a set of flights during adjacentweeks, and their behavior and results are observed over a relatively long period of time (9months). In parallel, a group of control flights were managed using the traditional mix of manualand algorithmic control (incumbent system). Such \sandbox" testing, while common at manylarge internet search and e-commerce companies is relatively rare in the revenue managementarea. Sandbox testing has an undisputable model of customer behavior but the experimentaldesign and analysis of results is less clear. In this paper we describe the philosophy behind theexperiment, the organizational challenges, the design and setup of the experiment, and outlinethe analysis of the results. This paper is a complement to a (more technical) related paper thatdescribes the econometrics and statistical analysis of the results.

Iowa Department of Management Performance Plan, FY 2009

Agency Performance Plan, Iowa Department of Management