991 resultados para Programs for improvement
Resumo:
G-1 Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs - October 2005
Resumo:
G-1 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance - November, 2005
Resumo:
State University Audit Report
Resumo:
This information is produced by the Department of Elder Affairs, about medicaid benifits.
Resumo:
Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs - December 2005
Resumo:
Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs, January 2006
Resumo:
Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs, February 2006
Resumo:
The Iowa Watershed Improvement Review Board was created by the Iowa Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in 2005 as Senate File 200. This statute is now codified in Iowa Code Chapter 466A. The fifteen-member board was appointed with the initial meeting being held August 22, 2005. Subsequent Board meetings were held October 10, December 2, and December 19. Attachment 1 lists the board members and their organization affiliation. The Board created a five-member subcommittee to develop and submit to the Board the Request for Applications (RFA) documents and procedural guidelines. These RFA documents were approved as modified on October 10, 2005.
Resumo:
G-1 - March 2006 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs
Resumo:
Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs April 2006
Resumo:
G-1, Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs, May 2006
Resumo:
Other Audit Reports - 28E Organizations
Resumo:
Appeal activity in the Public Assistance Programs
Resumo:
QUESTION UNDER STUDY: Emergency room (ER) interpretation of the ECG is critical to assessment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Our aim was to assess its reliability in our institution, a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Over a 6-month period all consecutive patients admitted for ACS were included in the study. ECG interpretation by emergency physicians (EPs) was recorded on a preformatted sheet and compared with the interpretation of two specialist physicians (SPs). Discrepancies between the 2 specialists were resolved by an ECG specialist. RESULTS: Over the 6-month period, 692 consecutive patients were admitted with suspected ACS. ECG interpretation was available in 641 cases (93%). Concordance between SPs was 87%. Interpretation of normality or abnormality of the ECG was concordant between EPs and SPs in 475 cases (74%, kappa = 0.51). Interpretation of ischaemic modifications was concordant in 69% of cases, and as many ST segment elevations were unrecognised as overdiagnosed (5% each). The same findings occurred for ST segment depressions and negative T waves (12% each). CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the ECG recorded during ACS by 2 SPs was discrepant in 13% of cases. Similarly, EP interpretation was discrepant from SP interpretation in 25% of cases, equally distributed between over- and underdiagnosing of ischaemic changes. The clinical implications and impact of medical education on ECG interpretation require further study.
Resumo:
G-1 June 2006 - Appeal Activity in the Public Assistance Programs