478 resultados para Concilio de Trento
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes stage directions.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Las 121 p. corresponden a: "Appendix ao primeiro volume desta primeira parte comprehende a dissertacao exegetica critica que se publicou entre os documentos da Academia da anno de 1723 contra o concilio intitulado Primeiro Bracarense que descobrio e publicou Fr. Bernardo de Brito"
Resumo:
Contents of v. 3, pts. 2-5, and v. 4, from Gesamtverzeichnis des deutschsprachigen Schrifttums, 1700-1910, and 1911-1965.
Resumo:
"La apendice ... en que vltra de agunas escrituras y priuilegios ... se pone vn comento para la explicacion del concilio de Aquisgran ...", con pag. propia.
Resumo:
None published, 1909
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Resumo:
The 2nd edition of the Workshop requirements@run.time was held at the 19th International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE 2011) in the city of Trento, Italy on the 30th of August 2011. It was organized by Nelly Bencomo, Emmanuel Letier, Jon Whittle, Anthony Finkelstein, and Kris Welsh. This foreword presents a digest of the discussions and presentations that took place during the workshop. © 2011 IEEE.
Resumo:
It was the intention of the Institute for Sociology and Social Policy at the Corvinus University Budapest in collaboration with the University of Trento to reflect the breadth of local development studies in the conference it staged in June 2011 ‘Social Resources in Local Development’. The event was in the framework of ‘Efficient Government, Professional Public Administration and Regional Development for a Competitive Society’ which is part of the TAMOP Project 4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR – 2010-0005 (Social and Cultural Resources Development Policies and Local Development Research Workshop led by Professor Zoltán Szántó). All the papers which feature in this volume were presented at the workshop. The research activity behind these papers (with the exception of Blokker) was supported by the aforementioned TAMOP project. The event was attended by a range of international participants including Erasmus Mundus students from the University of Trento and Corvinus students taking the MA in Local Development. It is hoped that this publication of conference proceedings highlights some current and key issues and controversies in local development research and academic debate.
Resumo:
Acknowledgements We thank Brian Roberts and Mike Harris for responding to our questions regarding their paper; Zoltan Dienes for advice on Bayes factors; Denise Fischer, Melanie Römer, Ioana Stanciu, Aleksandra Romanczuk, Stefano Uccelli, Nuria Martos Sánchez, and Rosa María Beño Ruiz de la Sierra for help collecting data; Eva Viviani for managing data collection in Parma. We thank Maurizio Gentilucci for letting us use his lab, and the Centro Intradipartimentale Mente e Cervello (CIMeC), University of Trento, and especially Francesco Pavani for lending us his motion tracking equipment. We thank Rachel Foster for proofreading. KKK was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship as part of a grant to VHF within the International Graduate Research Training Group on Cross-Modal Interaction in Natural and Artificial Cognitive Systems (CINACS; DFG IKG-1247) and TS by a grant (DFG – SCHE 735/3-1); both from the German Research Council.
Resumo:
How should educators respond to the whole phenomenon of ‘digital learning’? This question has been in vogue for the past twenty years or more and there is a need for a regular renewal of this question as societies change. This article will draw on some post-structuralist writing, particularly Deleuze and Guattari, to try to understand better the divide between the optimistic account and the pessimistic account of the effect of ICT on teaching and learning. It argues in particular 1) that ICT in its current form signals a paradigm shift in education—but this thesis is difficult either to prove or disprove; 2) that Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizome provides us with a theoretical tool for understanding the pedagogical nature of this shift; 3) that this change is wider than literacy itself and announces posthuman elements in the socio-cultural environment of learning.