Eternal peace, perpetual war? A critical investigation into Kant's conceptualisations of war

Most discussions of Immanuel Kant's political theory of international politics focus on his work on Eternal Peace and its normative and empirical relevance for contemporary international relations and international law. Yet for all his concern with peace, Kant's work is characterised by a fascinating preoccupation with the concept of war and its role in human history. The purpose of this essay is to investigate critically Kant's different conceptualisations of war and to evaluate his writing as a critique against contemporary versions of Liberal war and peace, as well as recent attempts to reduce war to an immanent logic of biopolitics.

State practice, customary humanitarian law and civilian casualties of armed conflict

The article examines the customary international law credentials of the humanitarian law rules proposed by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICR) in 2005. It relies on the BIICL/Chatham House analysis as a ‘constructive comment’ on the methodology of the ICRC study and the rules formed as a result of that methodology with respect to the dead and missing as an aid to determination of their customary law status. It shows that most of the rules studied have a customary international lawpedigree which conforms to the conclusions formed on the rules generally in the Wilmshurst and Breau study. However, the rules with respect to return of personal effects, recording location of graves and notification of relatives of access to gravesites do not seem to have even on a majoritarian/deductive approach enough volume of state practice to establish them as customary with respect to civilians.

Second Strike and you are (finally) out? The Quashing of the Prevention of Infiltration Law (Amendment no. 4)

The blog-post critically analyses the Israeli Supreme Court judgment (HCJ 8425/13 Anon v. Knesset et al) quashing the Prevention of Infiltration Law (Amendment no. 4), offering themes of comparative constitutional interest.

Just another case of treaty interpretation? Reconciling humanitarian law and human rights law in the ICJ

This chapter offers a fresh critique of the approach taken by the International Court of Justice to the relationship between humanitarian law and human rights law. In so doing, it seeks to move beyond the intractable debates that have dominated this area, offering an original account of the relationship that is firmly grounded in general international law concepts of treaty interpretation.

Conflicts of law and the mutual recognition of same-sex unions in the EU

My thesis uses legal arguments to demonstrate a requirement for recognition of same-sex marriages and registered partnerships between EU Member States. I draw on the US experience, where arguments for recognition of marriages void in some states previously arose in relation to interracial marriages. I show how there the issue of recognition today depends on conflicts of law and its interface with US constitutional freedoms against discrimination. I introduce the themes of the importance of domicile, the role of the public policy exception, vested rights, and relevant US constitutional freedoms. Recognition in the EU also depends on managing the tension between private international law and freedoms guaranteed by higher norms, in this case the EU Treaties and the European Convention on Human Rights. I set out the inconsistencies between various private international law systems and the problems this creates. Other difficulties are caused by the use of nationality as a connecting factor to determine personal capacity, and the overuse of the public policy exception. I argue that EU Law can constrain the use of conflicts law or public policy by any Member State where these are used to deny effect to same-sex unions validly formed elsewhere. I address the fact that family law falls only partly within Union competence, that existing EU Directives have had limited success at achieving full equality and that powers to implement new measures have not been used to their full potential. However, Treaty provisions outlawing discrimination on grounds of nationality can be interpreted so as to require recognition in many cases. Treaty citizenship rights can also be interpreted favourably to mandate recognition, once private international law is itself recognised as an obstacle to free movement. Finally, evolving interpretations of the European Convention on Human Rights may also support claims for cross-border recognition of existing relationships.

Competition and cooperation between international courts: a critical approach to the new paradigms of cross-border dispute resolution model

This article examines the arising cross-border dispute resolution models (Cooperation and Competition among national Courts) from a critical perspective. Although they have been conceived to surpass the ordinary solution of a Modern paradigm (exclusive jurisdiction, choice of court, lis pendens, forum non conveniens, among others), they are insufficient to deal with problems raised with present globalization, as they do not abandon aspects of that paradigm, namely, (i) statebased Law; and (ii) standardization of cultural issues.

A justiciabilidade dos direitos sociais no sistema interamericano: desafios e perspectivas

O presente trabalho sopesa a justiciabilidade dos direitos sociais no Sistema Interamericano. Para que tal análise pudesse ser realizada, em primeiro lugar, foi necessária a compreensão do que sejam direitos sociais (principalmente direito à saúde) e como derivam dos direitos fundamentais. Essa foi a melhor maneira de introduzir o tema para que houvesse real compreensão do motivo pelo qual seria complicada a existência de decisões que se referissem à violação de direitos sociais. O trabalho se desenvolve de forma a apresentar o Sistema Interamericano, suas formas de buscar proteger os direitos sociais e também de garantir sua manutenção. Por fim, o trabalho ainda apresenta conceitos como reserva do possível, soberania nacional e teoria do custo dos direitos como sendo obstáculos para a existência de decisões que privilegiam os direitos sociais. A conclusão da presente pesquisa, ainda não que fechada por conta de seu dinamismo, constatou que os obstáculos apresentados pela maioria da doutrina, em verdade, não serviriam de motivo para a não observância dos direitos sociais nas fundamentações das decisões do Sistema Interamericano, restando somente a possibilidade de um não desejo de intromissão em política pública interna.

A efetividade das decisões da corte interamericana de direitos humanos em relação ao direito à propriedade coletiva de comunidades indígenas e tribais

O presente trabalho analisará o cumprimento das decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos sobre o direito à propriedade coletiva de comunidades indígenas e tribais. Para isto será caracterizado em primeiro lugar o direito à propriedade coletiva no Sistema Intermaericano de Direitos Humanos. Em seguida serão analisadas as sentenças, abordado os fatos de cada caso e as medidas determinadas pela Corte. Os relatórios de monitoramento do cumprimento das decisões serão analisados, determinando quais medidas estabelecidas pela Corte foram cumpridas para que seja discutida a eficácia das decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos sobre este direito.

Global law in pieces fragmentation, regimes and pluralism

The idea that life undergoes a process of functional differentiation, and that, as a consequence, law becomes increasingly specialized – and maybe even transforms in its very nature – is now widespread. The specialized clusters of law or regulation are very often called regimes, in the international arena, international or transnational regimes. This paper deals, first, with three strong representations of international regimes and discusses some of their problems. It argues that, in order to make a good use of the category, it is necessary to keep in mind the differentiation between law and non-law in the wider context of governance. It then turns, firstly, to the notion of regimes as fragments of a unified and coherent public international law order and, secondly, as meeting points of regulations emerging from different legal orders as well as from other non-legal sources. Within public international law, regimes are seen as related to what is called the double fragmentation of that legal order. As clusters of regulation within a wider global regulatory order, regimes are put in relation to two types of legal or regulatory pluralism.

Multilateral rules on competition policy: an overview of the debate

Includes bibliography