The pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism in cancer: emerging links with tumour biology.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in individuals with cancer and is considered to be a cause of substantial mortality. Epidemiological studies identify malignancy as an independent VTE risk factor and show that cancer patients are at increased risk of both initial and recurrent VTE events. The risk due to cancer is compounded by the effects of chemotherapy and other treatments. The pathogenesis of cancer-associated VTE is complex involving multiple interactions between tumours and various components of haemostasis. The development of a systemic hypercoagulable state is considered a key pathogenetic feature and is attributed to tumour expression of tissue factor and other procoagulants, activation of vascular cells by tumour-derived cytokines and adhesive interactions between tumour cells and host cells. An increasing body of evidence indicates that the activation of haemostasis in malignant disease contributes to tumour growth and progression by stimulation of intracellular signalling pathways. The interaction of tissue factor, thrombin and other coagulation factors with protease activated receptor (PAR) proteins expressed by tumour cells and host vascular cells leads to the induction of genes related to the processes of angiogenesis, cell survival and cell adhesion and migration.

The radiation-inducible pE9 promoter driving inducible nitric oxide synthase radiosensitizes hypoxic tumour cells to radiation

Driving high-level transgene expression in a tumour-specific manner remains a key requirement in the development of cancer gene therapy. We have previously demonstrated the strong anticancer effects of generating abnormally high levels of intracellular NO• following the overexpression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene. Much of this work has focused on utilizing exogenously activated promoters, which have been primarily induced using X-ray radiation. Here we further examine the potential of the pE9 promoter, comprising a combination of nine CArG radio-responsive elements, to drive the iNOS transgene. Effects of X-ray irradiation on promoter activity were compared in vitro under normoxic conditions and various degrees of hypoxia. The pE9 promoter generated high-level transgene expression, comparable with that achieved using the constitutively driven cytomegalovirus promoter. Furthermore, the radio-resistance of radiation-induced fibrosarcoma-1 (RIF-1) mouse sarcoma cells exposed to 0.1 and 0.01% O2 was effectively eliminated following transfection with the pE9/iNOS construct. Significant inhibition of tumour growth was also observed in vivo following direct intratumoural injection of the pE9/iNOS construct compared to empty vector alone (P<0.001) or to a single radiation dose of 10?Gy (P<0.01). The combination of both therapies resulted in a significant 4.25 day growth delay compared to the gene therapy treatment alone (P<0.001). In summary, we have demonstrated the potential of the pE9/iNOS construct for reducing radio-resistance conferred by tumour cell hypoxia in vitro and in vivo, with greater tumour growth delay observed following the treatment with the gene therapy construct as compared with radiotherapy alone.