RELATIONSHIP AMONG EXTRACTIVES, LIGNIN AND HOLOCELLULOSE CONTENTS WITH PERFORMANCE INDEX OF SEVEN WOOD SPECIES USED FOR BOWS OF STRING INSTRUMENTS

In this paper we investigate the influence of extractives, lignin and holocellulose contents on performance index (PI) of seven woods used or tested for violin bows. Woods with higher values of this index (PI = root MOE/rho, where MOE is modulus of elasticity and rho is density) have a higher bending stiffness at a given mass, which can be related to bow wood quality. Extractive content was negatively correlated with PI in Caesalpinia echinata, Hanclroanthus sp. and Astronium lecointei. In C. echinata holocellulose was positively correlated with PI. These results need to be further explored with more samples and by testing additional wood properties. Although the chemical constituents could provide an indication of quality, it is not possible to establish appropriate woods for bows solely by examining their chemical constituents.

The Sociolinguistics of Hungarian Outside Hungary

This study describes the sociolinguistic situation of the indigenous Hungarian national minorities in Slovakia (c. 600,000), Ukraine (c. 180,000), Romania (c. 2,000,000), Yugoslavia (c. 300,000), Slovenia (c. 8,000) and Austria (c. 6,000). Following the guidelines of Hans Goebl et al, the historical sociolinguistic portrait of each minority is presented from 1920 through to the mid-1990s. Each country's report includes sections on geography and demography, history, politics, economy, culture and religion, language policy and planning, and language use (domains of minority and/or majority language use, proficiency, attitudes, etc.). The team's findings were presented in the form of 374 pages of manuscripts, articles and tables, written in Hungarian and English. The core of the team's research results lies in the results of an empirical survey designed to study the social characteristics of Hungarian-minority bilingualism in the six project countries, and the linguistic similarities and differences between the six contact varieties of Hungarian and Hungarian in Hungary. The respondents were divided by age, education, and settlement group - city vs. village and local majority vs. local minority. The first thing to be observed is that Hungarian is tending to be spoken less to children than to parents and grandparents, a familiar pattern of language shift. In contact varieties of Hungarian, analytic constructions may be used where monolingual Hungarians would use a more synthetic form. Mr Kontra gives as an example the compound tagdij, which in Standard Hungarian means "membership fee" but which is replaced in contact Hungarian by the two-word phrase tagsagi dij. Another similar example concerns the synthetic verb hegedult "played the violin" and the analytic expression hegedun jatszott. The contrast is especially striking between the Hungarians in the northern Slavic countries, who use the synthetic form frequently, and those in the southern Slavic countries, who mainly use the analytic form. Mr. Kontra notes that from a structural point of view, there is no immediate explanation for this, since Slovak or Ukrainian are as likely to cause interference as is Serbian. He postulates instead that the difference may be attributable to some sociohistoric cause, and points out that the Turkish occupation of what is today Voivodina caused a discontinuity of the Hungarian presence in the region, with the result that Hungarians were resettled in the area only two and a half centuries ago. However, the Hungarians in today's Slovakia and Ukraine have lived together with Slavic peoples continuously for over a millennium. It may be, he suggests, that 250 years of interethnic coexistence is less than is needed for such a contact-induced change to run its course. Next Mr. Kontra moved on to what he terms "mental maps and morphology". In Hungarian, the names of cities and villages take the surface case (eg. Budapest-en "in Budapest") whereas some names denoting Hungarian settlements and all names of foreign cities take the interior case (eg. Tihany-ban "in Tihany" and Boston-ban "in Boston). The role of the semantic feature "foreign" in suffix-choice can be illustrated by such minimal pairs as Velence-n "in Velence, a village in Hungary" versus Velence-ben "in Velence [=Venice], a city in Italy", and Pecs-en "in Pecs, a city in Hungary" vs. Becs-ben "in Becs, ie. Vienna". This Hungarian vs. foreign distinction is often interpreted as "belonging to historical (pre-1920) Hungary" vs. "outside historical Hungary". The distinction is also expressed in the dichotomy "home" vs. "abroad'. The 1920 border changes have had an impact on both majority and minority Hungarians' mental maps, the maps which govern the choice of surface vs. interior cases with placenames. As there is a growing divergence between the mental maps of majority and minority Hungarians, so there will be a growing divergence in their use of the placename suffixes. Two placenames were chosen to scratch the surface of this complex problem: Craiova (a city in Oltenia, Romania) and Kosovo (Hungarian Koszovo) an autonomous region in southeast Yugoslavia. The assumption to be tested was that both placenames would be used with the inessive (interior) suffixes categorically by Hungarians in Hungary, but that the superessive suffix (showing "home") would be used near-categorically by Hungarians in Romania and Yugoslavia (Voivodina). Minority Hungarians in countries other than Romania and Yugoslavia would show no difference from majority Hungarians in Hungary. In fact, the data show that, contrary to expectation, there is considerable variation within Hungary. And although Koszovo is used, as expected, with the "home" suffix by 61% of the informants in Yugoslavia, the same suffix is used by an even higher percentage of the subjects in Slovenia. Mr. Kontra's team suggests that one factor playing a role in this might be the continuance of the former Yugoslav mentality in the Hungarians of Slovenia, at least from the geographical point of view. The contact varieties of Hungarian show important grammatical differences from Hungarian in Hungary. One of these concerns the variable use of Null subjects (the inclusion or exclusion of the subject of the verb). When informants were asked to insert either megkertem or megkertem ot - "I asked her" - into a test sentence, 54.9% of the respondents in the Ukraine inserted the second phrase as opposed to only 27.4% in Hungary. Although Mr. Kontra and his team concentrated more on the differences between Contact Hungarian and Standard Hungarian, they also discovered a number of similarities. One such similarity is demonstrable in the distribution of what Mr. Kontra calls an ongoing syntactic merger in Hungarian in Hungary. This change means effectively that two possibilities merge to form a third. For instance, the two sentences Valoszinuleg kulfoldre fognak koltozni and Valoszinu, hogy kulfoldre fognak koltozni merge to form the new construction Valszinuleg, hogy kulfoldre fognak koltozni ("Probably they will move abroad."). When asked to choose "the most natural" of the sentences, one in four chose the new construction, and a chi-square test shows homogeneity in the sample. In other words, this syntactic change is spreading across the entire Hungarian-speaking region in the Carpathian Basin Mr. Kontra believes that politicians, educators, and other interested parties now have reliable and up-to-date information about each Hungarian minority. An awareness of Hungarian as a pluricentric language is being developed which elevates the status of contact varieties of Hungarian used by the minorities, an essential process, he believes, if minority languages are to be maintained.

Feryomerṭ ferḳlogṭ : from the opera Dr. Almasada

by A. Goldfaden. For violin arr. by Herman Fiedler

Bar Kochba : opera

by A. Goldfaden. Arr. for violin by Henry A. Russotta

The Wave Equation for Stringed Instruments

An elementary derivation of the wave equation as applied to violin strings is given.

Mus Hs 1204 - Arien und Gesänge mit Begleitung des Piano-Forte

Für Singstimme und Klavier

König Ahasverus : opera

by A. Goldfaden. Arr. [for] violin by H. A. Russotta

König Ahasverus : opera

by A. Goldfaden. Arr. [for] violin by H. A. Russotta [2]

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 54 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Jiri Veltruský (p. I 25, 242-321)

4 Briefe und 8 Beilagen zwischen Gerhard Tinter und Max Horkheimer, 1938; 1 Brief von Hans Tischler an Max Horkheimer, 08.12.1938; 4 Briefe zwischen Bernhard H. Titcomb und Max Horkheimer, 22.09.1935, 1935; 2 Briefe zwischen Paul Titus und Max Horkheimer, 07.06.1942, 09.06.1942; 1 Brief von Ferdinand Tönnies an Max Horkheimer, 17.10.1935; 1 Brief von Tonetti Juliette Favez, 21.11.1935; 1 Brief vom Treasury Department an Max Horkheimer, 11.02.1937; 1 Brief von Edith A. Trotter an Max Horkheimer, 13.02.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen The Twentieth Century Fund und Max Horkheimer, 22.12.1942, 02.01.1943; 4 Briefe zwischen Robert Ulich und F. Pollock, 1936, 10.04.1941, 1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an United States of America Commissioner for Immigration and Naturalisation, 01.11.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an das United States of America Department of Agriculture, 15.01.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an das United States of America Department of State, 07.10.1941; 1 Brief von Herbert Marcuse an das United States of America Department of State, 07.10.1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an das Universität Frankfurt Kuratorium der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, 05.07.1935; 1 Briefkopie von Max Horkheimer an die Universität Frankfurt, Der Rektor, 28.07.1933; 1 Brief und 1 Beilage von der University of Buffalo an Max Horkheimer, 06.03.1940; 5 Briefe zwischen der University of California Berkeley und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe zwischen der University of Colorado Libraries und Max Horkheimer, 17.10.1940, 25.10.1940; 3 Briefe zwischen der University of Newark und Max Horkheimer, 1935, 08.04.1938, 1938; 6 Briefe zwischen Jiri Veltruský und Max Horkheimer, 1948-1949; 1 Brief von Leon Verhille an Max Horkheimer, 19.12.1949; 5 Briefe zwischen Salka Viertel und Max Horkheimer, 1938, 1940; 1 Heiratsanzeige von Edward Walter Violin, 1949; 1 Notiz von Max Horkheimer an Edward Walter Violin; 1 Brief von Stitschan Voehard an Max Horkheimer, 03.01.1950;

Carlos Guastavino y su lenguaje en la guitarra : análisis desde la perspectiva de Leonard Meyer

La presente investigación propone relacionar los rasgos de la música criolla rural presentes en la Sonata Nº1 para guitarra del compositor argentino Carlos Guastavino, con el lenguaje compositivo escolástico propio del autor, desde la perspectiva analítica del musicólogo Leonard Meyer.

Sonata for the pianoforte or harpsichord [Música notada] : op. 66

Hay un ejemplar encuadernado con: Deux sonates et La Coquette pour forte piano (XVIII/2815).

Recuerdo de Weber [Manuscrito]: (Tomado de la sonata op.40)

Arreglo para banda de la "Sonata para piano op.49 de C.M. von Weber"

Adaptação e criação de exercícios técnicos para violino direcionados a alunos em iniciação ao instrumento

Relatório de estágio apresentado à Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas do Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Ensino de Música - Instrumento e Música de Conjunto.

Description of a College Chamber (manuscript copy), ca. 1744

This humorous, rhyming poem appears to have been co-authored by Thomas Handcock of Massachusetts and Richard Waterman of Warwick, Rhode Island. The document is also signed by Catharine Waterman. Neither of the authors attended Harvard College, and the circumstances of this poem's creation are not known. The poem suggests that they composed the poem while visiting - uninvited - the room of "honest Bob." The poem describes the contents of this college chamber, including the following items: an oak table with a broken leg; paper, a pen, and sand for writing; books, including "Scotch songs," philosophy, Euclid, a book of prayer, Tillotson, and French romances; pipes and tobacco; mugs; a broken violin; copperplate and mezzotint prints; a cat; clothes; two globes; a pair of bellows; a broom; a chamber pot; a candle in a bottle; tea; cups and saucers; a letter to Chloe, to whom the room's inhabitant apparently owed money; a powder horn; a fishing net; a rusty gun; a battledore; a shuttlecock; a cannister; a pair of shoes; and a coffee mill. The poem references events related to the War of Austrian Succession (1740-1748); British Vice Admiral Edward Vernon's siege of Portobello (in present-day Panama) in 1739; the "Rushian War" (perhaps the Russo-Swedish War of 1741-1743); and the War of Jenkins' Ear (the cat in the college chamber, like British Captain Robert Jenkins, has lost an ear).

Some early musical recollections of G. Haddock.

Mode of access: Internet.