EV02: a Phase I trial to compare the safety and immunogenicity of HIV DNA-C prime-NYVAC-C boost to NYVAC-C alone.

The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to see if the addition of 4 mg/ml DNA-C priming given by the intramuscular route at weeks 0 and 4 to NYVAC-C at weeks 20 and 24, safely increased the proportion of participants with HIV-specific T-cell responses measured by the interferon (IFN)-gamma ELISpot assay at weeks 26 and/or 28 compared to NYVAC-C alone. Although 2 individuals discontinued after the first DNA-C due to adverse events (1 vaso-vagal; 1 transient, asymptomatic elevation in alanine transaminase), the vaccines were well tolerated. Three others failed to complete the regimen (1 changed her mind; 2 lost to follow-up). Of the 35 that completed the regimen 90% (18/20) in the DNA-C group had ELISpot responses compared to 33% (5/15) that received NYVAC-C alone (p=0.001). Responses were to envelope in the majority (21/23). Of the 9 individuals with responses to envelope and other peptides, 8 were in the DNA-C group. These promising results suggest that DNA-C was an effective priming agent, that merits further investigation.

Acvbp Versus Acvbp Plus Rituximab For Young Patients With Localized Low-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Study By The Groupe D'etude Des Lymphomes De L'adulte

Introduction: In a prior study, we demonstrated that ACVBP + consolidation was superior to 3 cycles of CHOP + radiotherapy in young patients (pts) with localized aggressive lymphoma (Reyes F et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1197). This randomized trial compared in these pts ACVBP vs. ACVBP + a short course of rituximab (R-ACVBP).Methods: untreated pts between 18 and 65y with stage I/II DLBCL and no adverse prognostic factors according to the aa-IPI were eligible. ACVBP consisted of 3 induction cycles given every 2 weeks: doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) day 1, cyclophosphamide (1.2g/m2) day 1, vindesine (2 mg/m2) day 1 and 5, bleomycin (10 mg) day 1 and 5, prednisone (60 mg/m2) day 1 to 5 followed by consolidation with metothrexate, ifosfamide, VP-16 and cytarabine. R-ACVBP consisted of the same regimen combined with 4 doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) on day 1, 15, 29 and 43. Primary objective was EFS.Results: From 01/04 to 03/08, 223 pts were randomized, 113 in ACVBP and 110 in R-ACVBP arm. Characteristics were: median age 49y (18-65), stage I 63%, extranodal involvement 45%, bulky disease 4%. CR was 94% in ACVBP and 97% in ACVBP arm (ns). With a median follow-up of 43 months, the 3-y EFS was 82% (95% CI, 73% to 88%) in ACVBP and 93% (95% CI, 87% to 97%) in R-ACVBP group (P=0.0487). The 3-y PFS was 83% (95% CI, 74% to 89%) and 95% (95% CI, 89% to 98%) respectively (P=0.0205). OS did not significantly differ with a 3-y estimates of 97% (95% CI, 90% to 99%) for ACVBP and 98% (95% CI, 92% to 100%) for R-ACVBP (P=0.686). In multivariate analysis, a longer PFS was associated with R-ACVBP arm (P=0.0302) and lower b2-m level (P=0.0164). The same proportion of pts (27%) experienced at least 1 SAE in both groups. There were 4 deaths in each arm, with 1 treatment-related death in R-ACVBP (pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia).Conclusion: the addition of only 4 doses of rituximab to ACVBP significantly improves EFS and PFS in younger pts with low-risk localized DLBCL.

Managing hypertension in high-risk patients: lessons and promises from the STRATHE and ADVANCE trials.

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension represents a cost-effective way of preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. To benefit maximally from antihypertensive treatment, blood pressure should be brought to below 140/90 mmHg in every hypertensive patient, and even lower (< 130/80 mmHg) if diabetes or renal disease co-exists. Such targets cannot usually be reached using monotherapies. This is especially true in patients who present with a high cardiovascular risk. The co-administration of two agents acting by different mechanisms considerably increases the blood pressure control rate. Such combinations are not only efficacious, but are also well tolerated, and some fixed low-dose combinations even have a placebo-like tolerability. This is the case for the preparation containing the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril (2 mg) and the diuretic indapamide (0.625 mg), a fixed low-dose combination that has been shown in controlled trials to be more effective than monotherapies in reducing albuminuria, regressing cardiac hypertrophy and improving the stiffness of large arteries. Using this combination to initiate antihypertensive therapy has been shown in a double-blind trial (Strategies of Treatment in Hypertension: Evaluation; STRATHE) to normalize blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg) in significantly more patients (62%) than a sequential monotherapy approach based on atenolol, losartan and amlodipine (49%) and a stepped-care strategy based on valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (47%), with no difference between the three arm groups in terms of tolerability. An ongoing randomized trial (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; ADVANCE) is a study with a 2 x 2 factorial design assessing the effects of the fixed-dose perindopril-indapamide combination and of the intensive gliclazide modified release-based glucose control regimen in type 2 diabetic patients, with or without hypertension. A total of 11 140 patients were randomly selected. Within the first 6 weeks of treatment (run-in phase), the perindopril-indapamide combination lowered blood pressure from 145/81 +/- 22/11 mmHg (mean +/- SD) to 137/78 +/- 20/10 mmHg. Fixed-dose combinations are becoming more and more popular for the management of hypertension, and are even proposed by hypertension guidelines as a first-line option to treat hypertensive patients.

Fluconazole plus cyclosporine: a fungicidal combination effective against experimental endocarditis due to Candida albicans.

Recent observations demonstrated that fluconazole plus cyclosporine (Cy) synergistically killed Candida albicans in vitro. This combination was tested in rats with C. albicans experimental endocarditis. The MICs of fluconazole and Cy for the test organism were 0.25 and &gt;10 mg/liter, respectively. Rats were treated for 5 days with either Cy, amphotericin B, fluconazole, or fluconazole-Cy. Although used at high doses, the peak concentrations of fluconazole in the serum of rats (up to 4.5 mg/liter) were compatible with high-dose fluconazole therapy in humans. On the other hand, Cy concentrations in serum (up to 4.5 mg/liter) were greater than recommended therapeutic levels. Untreated rats demonstrated massive pseudohyphal growth in both the vegetations and the kidneys. However, only the kidneys displayed concomitant polymorphonuclear infiltration. The therapeutic results reflected this dissociation. In the vegetations, only the fungicidal fluconazole-Cy combination significantly decreased fungal densities compared to all groups, including amphotericin B (P &lt; 0.0001). In the kidneys, all regimens except the Cy regimen were effective, but fluconazole-Cy remained superior to amphotericin B and fluconazole alone in sterilizing the organs (P &lt; 0.0001). While the mechanism responsible for the fluconazole-Cy interaction is hypothetical, this observation opens new perspectives for fungicidal combinations between azoles and other drugs.

Clinical management of immunocompetent hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Background: Clinical practices and guidelines may differ regarding the management of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: The management of 152 consecutive CAP inpatients (70+/-17 years) admitted to a teaching hospital was analyzed retrospectively and compared with published data and an evidence-based guideline developed at our institution. Results: Of the patients studied, 64% had a high prognostic score index (PSI), 14% were admitted to the ICU, and 4.6% died. Initially, patients received either a one-drug (47%) or a two-drug (53%) antibiotic regimen. None of the 20 PSI parameters, and neither the PSI nor admission to the ICU, was associated with the initial antibiotic regimen. Agreement between current practice and our guideline was low (kappa=0.16). Following the recommendations would have led to a decrease of 51% in the initial two-drug regimen. The duration of i.v. antibiotherapy was higher in patients following the two-drug regimen (142+/-150 vs. 102+/-60 h, P<0.05). Chest physiotherapy (CP) and bronchodilatators (BD) were prescribed in 72% and 54% of cases, respectively (median duration 10 days). Conclusions: The variations observed in the clinical management of CAP inpatients were not in agreement with published guidelines. The overuse of a two-drug regimen, CP, and BD necessitates the development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines proposing detailed steps for the management of CAP inpatients.

Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens: experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study.

Dual-boosted protease inhibitors (DBPI) are an option for salvage therapy for HIV-1 resistant patients. Patients receiving a DBPI in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study between January1996 and March 2007 were studied. Outcomes of interest were viral suppression at 24 weeks. 295 patients (72.5%) were on DBPI for over 6 months. The median duration was 2.2 years. Of 287 patients who had HIV-RNA >400 copies/ml at the start of the regimen, 184 (64.1%) were ever suppressed while on DBPI and 156 (54.4%) were suppressed within 24 weeks. The median time to suppression was 101 days (95% confidence interval 90-125 days). The median number of past regimens was 6 (IQR, 3-8). The main reasons for discontinuing the regimen were patient's wish (48.3%), treatment failure (22.5%), and toxicity (15.8%). Acquisition of HIV through intravenous drug use and the use of lopinavir in combination with saquinavir or atazanavir were associated with an increased likelihood of suppression within 6 months. Patients on DBPI are heavily treatment experienced. Viral suppression within 6 months was achieved in more than half of the patients. There may be a place for DBPI regimens in settings where more expensive alternates are not available.

Procalcitonin for reduced antibiotic exposure in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomised study.

In patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), guidelines recommend antibiotic therapy adjustment according to microbiology results after 72 h. Circulating procalcitonin levels may provide evidence that facilitates the reduction of antibiotic therapy. In a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, 101 patients with VAP were assigned to an antibiotic discontinuation strategy according to guidelines (control group) or to serum procalcitonin concentrations (procalcitonin group) with an antibiotic regimen selected by the treating physician. The primary end-point was antibiotic-free days alive assessed 28 days after VAP onset and analysed on an intent-to-treat basis. Procalcitonin determination significantly increased the number of antibiotic free-days alive 28 days after VAP onset (13 (2-21) days versus 9.5 (1.5-17) days). This translated into a reduction in the overall duration of antibiotic therapy of 27% in the procalcitonin group (p = 0.038). After adjustment for age, microbiology and centre effect, the rate of antibiotic discontinuation on day 28 remained higher in the procalcitonin group compared with patients treated according to guidelines (hazard rate 1.6, 95% CI 1.02-2.71). The number of mechanical ventilation-free days alive, intensive care unit-free days alive, length of hospital stay and mortality rate on day 28 for the two groups were similar. Serum procalcitonin reduces antibiotic therapy exposure in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia.

Current multiple myeloma treatment strategies with novel agents: a European perspective.

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has undergone significant developments in recent years. The availability of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide has expanded treatment options and has improved the outcome of patients with MM. Following the introduction of these agents in the relapsed/refractory setting, they are also undergoing investigation in the initial treatment of MM. A number of phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of novel agent combinations in the transplant and nontransplant settings, and based on these results standard induction regimens are being challenged and replaced. In the transplant setting, a number of newer induction regimens are now available that have been shown to be superior to the vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone regimen. Similarly, in the front-line treatment of patients not eligible for transplantation, regimens incorporating novel agents have been found to be superior to the traditional melphalan plus prednisone regimen. Importantly, some of the novel agents appear to be active in patients with high-risk disease, such as adverse cytogenetic features, and certain comorbidities, such as renal impairment. This review presents an overview of the most recent data with these novel agents and summarizes European treatment practices incorporating the novel agents.

Long-term follow-up of European APL 2000 trial, evaluating the role of cytarabine combined with ATRA and Daunorubicin in the treatment of nonelderly APL patients.

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combined to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is the reference treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Whereas, in high-risk patients, cytarabine (AraC) is often considered useful in combination with anthracycline to prevent relapse, its usefulness in standard-risk APL is uncertain. In APL 2000 trial, patients with standard-risk APL [i.e., with baseline white blood cell (WBC) count <10,000/mm(3) ] were randomized between treatment with ATRA with Daunorubicin (DNR) and AraC (AraC group) and ATRA with DNR but without AraC (no AraC group). All patients subsequently received combined maintenance treatment. The trial had been prematurely terminated due to significantly more relapses in the no AraC group (J Clin Oncol, (24) 2006, 5703-10), but follow-up was still relatively short. With long-term follow-up (median 103 months), the 7-year cumulative incidence of relapses was 28.6% in the no AraC group, compared to 12.9% in the AraC group (P = 0.0065). In standard-risk APL, at least when the anthracycline used is DNR, avoiding AraC may lead to an increased risk of relapse suggesting that the need for AraC is regimen-dependent.

Parameters for successful monthly extended dosing of darbepoetin-alpha in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

AIM: To document the feasibility and report the results of dosing darbepoetin-alpha at extended intervals up to once monthly (QM) in a large dialysis patient population. MATERIAL: 175 adult patients treated, at 23 Swiss hemodialysis centres, with stable doses of any erythropoiesis-stimulating agent who were switched by their physicians to darbepoetin-alpha treatment at prolonged dosing intervals (every 2 weeks [Q2W] or QM). METHOD: Multicentre, prospective, observational study. Patients' hemoglobin (Hb) levels and other data were recorded 1 month before conversion (baseline) to an extended darbepoetin-alpha dosing interval, at the time of conversion, and once monthly thereafter up to the evaluation point (maximum of 12 months or until loss to follow-up). RESULTS: Data for 161 evaluable patients from 23 sites were included in the final analysis. At 1 month prior to conversion, 73% of these patients were receiving darbepoetin-alpha weekly (QW) and 27% of the patients biweekly (Q2W). After a mean follow-up of 9.5 months, 34% received a monthly (QM) dosing regimen, 52% of the patients were receiving darbepoetin-alpha Q2W, and 14% QW. The mean (SD) Hb concentration at baseline was 12.3 +/- 1.2 g/dl, compared to 11.9 +/- 1.2 g/dl at the evaluation point. The corresponding mean weekly darbepoetin-alpha dose was 44.3 +/- 33.4 microg at baseline and 37.7 +/- 30.8 microg at the evaluation point. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to extended darbepoetin-alpha dosing intervals of up to QM, with maintenance of initial Hb concentrations, was successful for the majority of stable dialysis patients.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic factors influencing plasma and cellular antiretroviral drug disposition

Abstract: The improvement in antiretroviral drug therapy has transformed HIV infection into a chronic disease. However, treatment failure and drug toxicity are frequent. Inadequate response to treatment is clearly multifactorial and, therefore, dosage individualisation based on demographic factors, genetic markers and measurement of cellular and plasma drug level may enhance both drug efficacy and tolerability. At present, antiretroviral drugs levels are monitored in plasma, whereas only drugs penetrating into cells are able to exert an antiviral activity, suggesting that cellular drug determination may more confidently reflect drug exposure at the site of pharmacological action. The overall objective of this thesis is to provide a better understanding of the Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic factors influencing the plasma and cellular disposition of antiretroviral drugs. To that endeavour, analytical methods for the measurements of plasma and cellular drug levels have been developed and validated using liquid chromatography methods coupled with ultraviolet and tandem mass spectrometry detection, respectively. Correlations between plasma and cellular exposures were assessed during observational and experimental studies. Cytochrome (CYP) 2B6, efflux transporters (ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2 and ABCG2) and orosomucoid (ORM) polymorphisms were determined and were related to plasma and cellular exposures, as well as toxicity of antiretroviral drugs. A Pharmacokinetic population model was developed to characterise inter- and intra-patient variability of atazanavir pharmacokinetics, and to identify covariates influencing drug disposition. In that context, a Pharmacokinetic interaction study between atazanavir and lopinavir, both boosted with ritonavir, has beén conducted to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of this boosted double-protease inhibitors regimen. Well to moderately-correlated cellular and plasma drug levels are .observed or protease inhibitors, whereas for efavirenz and nevirapine these correlations are weak. Cellular exposure, and CYP2B6 genotype (516G>T) are predictors of efavirenz neuropsychological toxicity. Nevirapine plasma exposure is also influenced by CYPZB6 polymorphism. Nelfinavir cellular exposure appears to be significantly associated only with ABCB1 genotype (3435C>T and intron 26 + 80T>C). Indinavir and lopinavir clearance and lopinavir cellular/plasma exposure ratio are influenced by the concentration of the variant S of ORM, suggesting-a specific binding of these drugs to this variant. Nelfinavir and efavirenz are not influenced by ORM concentration and phenotype. The Pharmacokinetic parameters of atazanavir are adequately described by our population model. The atazanavir-lopinavir interaction study indicates no influence on plasma and cellular atazanavir pharmacokinetics, while limited decrease in lopinavir concentrations was observed after atazanavir addition. The residual variability unexplained by the considered variables suggests that other covariates either uncontrolled at present or remaining to be identified, such as genetic and environmental factors influence antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics, with substantial impact on treatment efficacy and tolerability. In that context, a comprehensive approach taking into account drug pharmacokinetics and patient genetic background is expected to contribute to increase treatment success, and to reduce the occurrence of adverse drug reactions by stratifying patients in an individualised antiretroviral therapy approach. Résumé Facteurs pharmacocinétiques et pharmacogénétiques influençant l'exposition plasmatique et cellulaire des antirétroviraux Les progrès de la thérapie antirétrovirale ont transformé l'infection par le VIH d'une affection mortelle à une maladie chronique. En dépit de ce succès, l'échec thérapeutique et la toxicité médicamenteuse restent fréquents. Une réponse inadéquate au traitement est clairement multifactorielle et une individualisation de la posologie des médicaments qui se baserait sur les facteurs démographiques et génétiques des patients et sur les taux sanguins des médicaments pourrait améliorer à la fois l'efficacité et la tolérance de la thérapie. Par ailleurs, seules les concentrations plasmatiques sont actuellement considérées pour le suivi thérapeutique des médicaments, alors que les taux cellulaires pourraient mieux refléter l'activité de ses médicaments qui agissent au niveau intracellulaire. L'objectif global de cette thèse était de mieux comprendre les facteurs pharmacocinétiques et pharmacocénétiques influençant l'exposition plasmatique et cellulaire des médicaments antirétroviraux. A cet effet, des méthodes pour quantifier les concentrations plasmatiques et cellulaires des antirétroviraux ont été développées et validées en utilisant la chromatographie liquide couplée à la détection ultraviolette et la spectrométrie de masse en tandem, respectivement. La corrélation entre l'exposition cellulaire et plasmatique de ces médicaments a été étudiée lors d'études observationnelles et expérimentales. Les polymorphismes du cytochrome (CYP) 2B6, ainsi que des transporteurs d'efflux (ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2 et ABCG2) et de l'orosomucoïde (ORM) ont été déterminés et corrélés avec l'exposition plasmatique et cellulaire des antirétroviraux, ainsi qu'à leur toxicité. Un modèle de pharmacocinétique de population a été établi afin de caractériser la variabilité inter- et intra-individuelle de l'atazanavir, et d'identifier les covariables pouvant influencer le devenir de ce médicament. Dans ce contexte, une étude d'interaction entre l'atazanavir et le lopinavir a été effectuée afin de déterminer la sécurité et le profil pharmacocinétique de ce régime thérapeutique. Des corrélations modérées à bonnes ont été observées entre les taux cellulaires et plasmatiques des inhibiteurs de protéase, alors que pour l'efavirenz et la névirapine ces corrélations sont faibles. L'exposition cellulaire, ainsi que le génotype du CYP2B6 (516G>T) sont des indices de la toxicité neuropsychologique de l'efavirenz. L'exposition plasmatique de la névirapine est également influencée par le polymorphisme du CYPZB6. L'exposition cellulaire du nelfinavir est significativement associée au génotype du ABCB1 (3435C>T et intron 26 + 80T>C). La clairance de l'indinavir et du lopinavir, ainsi que le rapport entre exposition cellulaire et plasmatique du lopinavir sont influencés par la concentration du variant S de l'ORM, suggérant une liaison spécifique de ces médicaments à ce variant. La clairance du nelfinavir et de l'efavirenz n'est pas influencée ni par la concentration ni par le phénotype de l'ORM. Les paramètres pharmacocinétiques de l'atazanavir ont été décrits de façon adéquate par le modèle de population proposé. De plus, le lopinavir n'influence pas les concentrations plasmatiques et cellulaires de l'atazanavir; alors que celui-ci conduit à une baisse limitée des taux de lopinavir. L'importante variabilité pharmacocinétique des antirétroviraux suggère que d'autres facteurs génétiques et environnementaux -qui restent encore à découvrir- influencent également leur disponibilité. Dans un proche futur, une prise en charge qui tienne. compte de la pharmacocinétique des médicaments et des caractéristiques génétiques du patient devrait permettre d'individualiser le traitement, contribuant certainement à une amélioration de la réponse thérapeutique et à une diminution de la toxicité. Résumé grand public Facteurs pharmacocinétiques et pharmacogénétiques influençant l'exposition plasmatique et cellulaire des antirétroviraux Les progrès effectués dans le traitement de l'infection par le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine acquise (VIH), ont permis de transformer une maladie avec un pronostic sombre, en une maladie chronique traitable avec des médicaments de plus en plus efficaces. Malgré ce succès, de nombreux patients ne répondent pas de façon optimale à leur traitement et/ou souffrent d'effets indésirables médicamenteux entraînant fréquemment une modification de leur thérapie. Actuellement, le suivi de la réponse au traitement s'effectue par la mesure chez les patients de la quantité de virus et du nombre des cellules immunitaires dans le sang, ainsi que par la concentration sanguine des médicaments administrés. Cependant, comme le virus se réplique à l'intérieur de la cellule, la mesure des concentrations médicamenteuses au niveau intracellulaire pourrait mieux refléter l'activité pharmacologique au site d'action. De plus, il a été possible de mettre en évidence la grande variabilité des concentrations plasmatiques de médicaments chez des patients prenant pourtant la même dose de médicament. Comme cette variabilité est notamment due à des facteurs génétiques qui sont susceptibles d'influencer la réponse au traitement antirétroviral, des analyses génétiques ont été également effectuées chez ces patients. Cette thèse a eu pour objectif de mieux comprendre les facteurs pharmacologiques et génétiques influençant l'activité et la toxicité des médicaments antirétroviraux afin de réduire la variabilité de la réponse thérapeutique. A cet effet, une méthode de dosage permettant la quantification des médicaments anti-HIV au niveau intracellulaire a été développée. Par ailleurs, nos études ont également porté .sur les variations génétiques influençant la quantité et l'activité des protéines impliquées dans le métabolisme et dans le transport des médicaments antirétroviraux. Enfin, les conséquences de ces variations sur la réponse clinique et la toxicité du traitement ont été évaluées. Nos études ont mis en évidence des associations significatives entre les variations génétiques considérées et la concentration sanguine, cellulaire et la toxicité de quelques médicaments antirétroviraux. La complémentarité des connaissances pharmacologiques, génétiques et virales pourrait aboutir à une stratégie globale permettant d'individualiser le traitement et la dose administrée, en fonction des caractéristiques propres de chaque patient. Cette approche pourrait contribuer à une optimisation du traitement antirétroviral dans la perspective d'une meilleure- efficacité thérapeutique à long terme et d'une diminution des effets indésirables rencontrés.

Gentamicin Improves the Activities of Daptomycin and Vancomycin against Enterococcus faecalis In Vitro and in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model.

For enterococcal implant-associated infections, the optimal treatment regimen has not been defined. We investigated the activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, and gentamicin (and their combinations) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. Antimicrobial activity was investigated by time-kill and growth-related heat production studies (microcalorimetry) as well as with a guinea pig model using subcutaneously implanted cages. Infection was established by percutaneous injection of E. faecalis in the cage. Antibiotic treatment for 4 days was started 3 h after infection. Cages were removed 5 days after end of treatment to determine the cure rate. The MIC, the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in the logarithmic phase, and the MBC in the stationary phase were 1.25, 5, and >20 μg/ml for daptomycin, 1, >64, and >64 μg/ml for vancomycin, and 16, 32, and 4 μg/ml for gentamicin, respectively. In vitro, gentamicin at subinhibitory concentrations improved the activity against E. faecalis when combined with daptomycin or vancomycin in the logarithmic and stationary phases. In the animal model, daptomycin cured 25%, vancomycin 17%, and gentamicin 50% of infected cages. In combination with gentamicin, the cure rate for daptomycin increased to 55% and that of vancomycin increased to 33%. In conclusion, daptomycin was more active than vancomycin against adherent E. faecalis, and its activity was further improved by the addition of gentamicin. Despite a short duration of infection (3 h), the cure rates did not exceed 55%, highlighting the difficulty of eradicating E. faecalis from implants already in the early stage of implant-associated infection.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy (ICE) under circulating progenitor cells (CPC) protection in patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Preliminary report on a multicentric study

Starting in February 1994, 20 patients (pt) with a median age of 50 years(range 41-63) from 7 European centers have been included. Completedata were obtained in 16 patients so far. CPC were mobilized with chemo(Epirubicine 75 mg/m2 /d, 01 + 02) followed by G-CSF 5 p.gfkg/d for14 days. HD chemo consisted in 3 sequential courses of ICE regimen(UOs. 10 g/m2 , Carbo. 1200 mg/m2 and Etop. 1200 mg/m2 ) underCPC protection and G-CSF 5 p.g/kg/d. Out of the 16 pt, 12 completedfull program (3 cycles). One pt died of septic shock before receivingany ICE course. One pt died during the first ICE of renal insufficiency.Two pt had only 2 courses because of toxicity. Among the 16 pt, responserate (RR) was: 7 CR, 6 PR, 1 PO; 3 pt are not evaluable dueto early withdrawal (overall RR: 13/16 = 81 %). Thirty-nine cycles ofHD chemo were given with a median hematological recovery of 9 days(range 7-12) until neutro. counts> 1.0 x 109 /1 and 9 days (range 717)until thrombo. > 20 x 109 /1. No cumulative, hematological toxicitywas seen. Accrual of patients is still ongoing and updated results will bepresented.

Adherence as a predictor of the development of class-specific resistance mutations: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence is one of the strongest predictors of therapeutic failure in HIV-positive patients. Virologic failure with subsequent emergence of resistance reduces future treatment options and long-term clinical success. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study including patients starting new class of antiretroviral therapy (ART) between 2003 and 2010. Participants were naïve to ART class and completed ≥1 adherence questionnaire prior to resistance testing. Outcomes were development of any IAS-USA, class-specific, or M184V mutations. Associations between adherence and resistance were estimated using logistic regression models stratified by ART class. RESULTS: Of 314 included individuals, 162 started NNRTI and 152 a PI/r regimen. Adherence was similar between groups with 85% reporting adherence ≥95%. Number of new mutations increased with increasing non-adherence. In NNRTI group, multivariable models indicated a significant linear association in odds of developing IAS-USA (odds ratio (OR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-2.67) or class-specific (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.00-2.70) mutations. Levels of drug resistance were considerably lower in PI/r group and adherence was only significantly associated with M184V mutations (OR 8.38, 95% CI: 1.26-55.70). Adherence was significantly associated with HIV RNA in PI/r but not NNRTI regimens. CONCLUSION: Therapies containing PI/r appear more forgiving to incomplete adherence compared with NNRTI regimens, which allow higher levels of resistance, even with adherence above 95%. However, in failing PI/r regimens good adherence may prevent accumulation of further resistance mutations and therefore help to preserve future drug options. In contrast, adherence levels have little impact on NNRTI treatments once the first mutations have emerged.

Diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension.

Abstract Hypertension resistant to lifestyle interventions and antihypertensive medications is a common problem encountered by physicians in everyday practice. It is most often defined as a blood pressure remaining ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite the regular intake of at least three drugs lowering blood pressure by different mechanisms, one of them being a diuretic. It now appears justified to include, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system and a calcium channel blocker in this drug regimen, not only to gain antihypertensive efficacy, but also to prevent or regress target organ damage and delay the development of cardiorenal complications. A non-negligible fraction of treatment-resistant hypertension have normal "out of office" blood pressures. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and/or home blood pressure recording should therefore be routinely performed to identify patients with true resistant hypertension, i.e. patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment intensification.