Merchant vessels of the United States.

Subtitle varies.

United States investor.

Mode of access: Internet.

United States Steel Corporation. Hearings before the Committee on Investigation of United States Steel Corporation. House of Representatives.

Appendix, parts 1 and 2; general index to Hearings, in v. 4.

Appletons' railroad and steamboat companion : being a travellers' guide through New England and the middle states, with routes in the southern and western states, and also in Canada /

Mode of access: Internet.

Recent tanker accidents : hearings before the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, first session ...

"Serial no. 95-4."

Annual report on transport statistics in the United States.

Beginning with 1980, issued in two parts: Transport statistics in the United States. Part 1, Railroads, and; Transport statistics in the United States. Part 2, Motor carriers.

United States steel corporation. Hearings before the Committee on investigation of United States steel corporation. House of representatives. [In eight volumes]

Vol. 8 consists of "Appendix: parts 1 and 2. Report of the commissioner of corporations on the steel industry. Pt. I-II"; "General index to Hearings"; and "Investigation of United States steel corporation" (House rept. 1127, 62d Cong., 2d sess., submitted by Mr. Stanley, "Views of the minority" by Mr. Gardner and Mr. Young)

The United States and trade disputes in the World Trade Organization: Hegemony constrained or confirmed?

Does the World Trade Organization function to reinforce American dominance (or hegemony) of the world economy? We examine this question via an analysis of trade disputes involving the United States. This allows us to assess whether the US does better than other countries in this judicialised forum: and in so doing enhance the competitive prospects of their firms. The results are equivocal. The United States does best in the early phases of a dispute, where political power is important. It does less well as the process develops.

Arbitration between carriers and employees. Boards of adjustment. Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on interstate commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-eighth Congress, first session, on S. 2646, a bill to provide for the expeditious and prompt settlement, mediation, concilation, and arbitration of disputes between carriers and their employees and subordinate officials, and for other purposes. March 18, 28, 29, April 4, and 7, 1924 ...

Mode of access: Internet.

Clinton, Bush, and Obama : changing policy and rhetoric in the United States Annual Trafficking in Persons Report

This chapter charts the political transitions in the anti-trafficking agenda and rhetoric of the U.S. Government across three Presidential administrations through a detailed examination of the annual Trafficking in Persons reports released by the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons between 2001 and 2012. We argue that the transitions in language and focus reflect key tensions that have dominated trafficking discourse throughout the Clinton, Bush and Obama Presidencies. These fissures include debate over law enforcement versus rights-based frameworks, competing approaches on victim protection and identification, and ongoing disputes about the relationship between prostitution and human trafficking.

Comparative advantage in demand: Experimental evidence of preferences for genetically modified food in the United States and European Union

The United States (US) exports more than US$6 billion in agricultural commodities to the European Union (EU) each year, but one issue carries the potential to diminish this trade: use of biotechnology in food production. The EU has adopted more stringent policies towards biotechnology than the US. Understanding differences in European and American policies towards genetically modified (GM) foods requires a greater understanding of consumers' attitudes and preferences. This paper reports results from the first large-scale, cross-Atlantic study to analyse consumer demand for genetically modified food in a non-hypothetical market environment. We strongly reject the frequent if convenient assumption in trade theory that consumer preferences are identical across countries: the median level of compensation demanded by English and French consumers to consume a GM food is found to be more than twice that in any of the US locations. Results have important implications for trade theory, which typically focusses on differences in specialization, comparative advantage and factor endowments across countries, and for on-going trade disputes at the World Trade Organization.

An Introduction to Conservation Easements in the United States: A Simple Concept and a Complicated Mosaic of Law

The idea of a conservation easement – restrictions on the development and use of land designed to protect the land’s conservation or historic values – can be relatively easily understood. More significant and more challenging is the complex body of state and federal laws that shapes the creation, funding, tax treatment, enforcement, modification, and termination of conservation easements. The explosion in the number of conservation easements over the past four decades has made them one of the most popular land protection mechanisms in the United States. The National Conservation Easement Database estimates that the total number of acres encumbered by conservation easements exceeds 40 million.Because conservation easements are both novel and ubiquitous, understanding how they actual work is essential for practicing lawyers, policymakers, land trust professionals, and students of conservation. This article provides a “quick tour” through some of the most important aspects of the developing mosaic of conservation easement law. It gives the reader a sense of the complex inter-jurisdictional dynamics that shape conservation transactions and disputes about conservation easements. Professors of property law, environmental law, tax law, and environmental studies who wish to cover conservation easements in the context of a more general course can use the article to provide their students with a broad but comprehensive overview of the relevant legal and policy issues.

Limiting Scope of Injunctions in Labor Disputes. : hearings before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on S. 1482, Seventieth Congress, first session, Seventieth Congress, second session.

Considers (70) S. 1482.

The United States and the politics of trade: the banana war with Europe and the Caribbean

This thesis examines the involvement of the United States in the decade-long trade dispute before the World Trade Organization (WTO) over the European Union's preferential banana regime. Washington's justification for bringing this case to the WTO comes from Section 301 of the U.S. trade act, which allows for disputes to be undertaken if U.S. "interests" are violated; however, this is the first case ever undertaken by the United States that does not directly threaten any American banana industry, nor affect any American jobs. Why, then, would the United States involve itself in this European-Caribbean-Latin American dispute? It is the contention of this thesis that the United States thrust itself headlong into this debate for two reasons: domestically, the United States Trade Representative came under pressure, via the White House and Congress, from Chiquita CEO Carl Lindner, who in the past decade donated more than $7.1 million to American politicians to take the case to the WTO. Internationally, the United States used the case as an opportunity to assert its power over Europe, with the Eastern Caribbean islands being caught in the economic crossfire. According to existing literature, in undertaking this case, the United States did as any nation would: it operated within both domestic and international levels, satisfying at each level key interests, with the overall goal of maintaining the nation's best interests.