Structural challenges in a multipolar and multicultural global legal era : BRICS’ global legal politics beyond cultural and economic partnerships

New emerging international dynamics introduce a global poly-axiological polycentric disorder which undermines the tradition of a unique global legal order in international law. Modern Era was characterized by Western European civilizational model – from which human rights is a byproduct. This consensus had its legitimacy tested by XXst century’s scenario – and the ‘BRICS factor/actor’ is a symptom of this reality. Its empowerment in world politics lead to the rise of distinct groups of States/civilizations provided with different legal, political, economic and social traditions – promoting an unexpected uprise of otherness in international legal order and inviting it to a complete and unforeseeable reframing process. Beyond Washington or Brussels Consensus, other custom-originated discourses (Brasília, Moscow, New Delhi, Peking or Cape Town Consensus, among other unfolded possibilities) will probably henceforth attempt shaping international law in present global legal disorder.

The old logics of the New International Economic Order

Includes bibliography

A new international industrial order

Includes bibliography

The Latin American countries and the New International Economic Order

Includes bibliography

Recopilación de resoluciones relacionadas con la Estrategia Internacional del Desarrollo y el Nuevo Orden Económico Internacional aprobadas por la Asamblea General y el Consejo Económico y Social de las NU, CEPAL y CDCC = Collected resolutions on the International Development Strategy and the New International Economic Order adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and Economic and Social Council, the CEPAL and the CDCC

Incluye Bibliografía

Caribbean and the New International Economic Order

Includes bibliography

Estrategia Internacional de Desarrollo y establecimiento de un Nuevo Orden Económico Internacional: tercera evaluación regional, Guatemala, 1977 = International Development Strategy and establishment of a New International Economic Order: third regional appraisal, Guatemala, 1977

Evaluación de Guatemala. Resolución 362XVII aprobada por CEPAL en su Decimoséptimo Período de Sesiones, Guatemala, 1977

A new international industrial order

Includes bibliography

Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order

Comparing the treatment of Islamic veils and Christian crucifixes by the European Court of Human Rights, this paper re-examines the charge of “double standards” on the part of this guardian of the European legal order, which is seen as disadvantaging Islam and favoring Christianity. While this is proved partially correct, the paper calls for a more differentiated treatment of the issue. For one, there is a modicum of consistency in the European Court’s decisions, because they are all meant to further “pluralism”. Only, Islam and Christianity fare differently in this respect, as “threat” to and “affirmation” of pluralism, respectively. This distinction hinges on Islam’s compatibility with the liberal-secular order, on which the jury is out. A possible way out of the “pluralism v. pluralism” dilemma, I argue, is signaled in the European Court’s recent decision in Lautsi v. Italy (2011), which pairs a preference for “culturalized” Christianity with robust minority pluralism.