Evaluation of a brief child-focused group-based intervention for anxiety-disordered children

This paper presents a pilot study of a brief, group-based, cognitive-behavioural intervention for anxiety-disordered children. Five children (aged 7 to 13 years) diagnosed with a clinically significant anxiety disorder were treated with a recently developed 6-session, child-focused, cognitive-behavioural intervention that was evaluated using multiple measures (including structured diagnostic interview, self-report questionnaires and behaviour rating scales completed by parents) over four follow-up occasions (posttreatment, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up and 12-month follow-up). This trial aimed to (a) evaluate the conclusion suggested by the research of Cobham, Dadds, and Spence (1998) that anxious children with non-anxious parents require a child-focused intervention only in order to demonstrate sustained clinical gains; and (b) to evaluate a new and more cost-effective child-focused cognitive-behavioural intervention. Unfortunately, the return rate of the questionnaires was poor, rendering this data source of questionable value. However, diagnostic interviews (traditionally the gold standard in terms of outcome in this research area) were completed for all children at all follow-up points. Changes in diagnostic status indicated that meaningful treatment-related gains had been achieved and were maintained over the full follow-up period. The results would thus seem to support the principle of participant-intervention matching proposed by Cobham et al. (1998), as well as the utility of the more brief intervention evaluated.

A brief motivational intervention for substance misuse in recent-onset psychosis

Substance misuse is common in early psychosis, and impacts negatively on outcomes. Little is known about effective interventions for this population. We report a pilot study of brief intervention for substance misuse in early psychosis ( Start Over and Survive: SOS), comparing it with Standard Care(SC). Twenty-five in-patients aged 18 - 35 years with early psychosis and current misuse of non-opioid drugs were allocated randomly to conditions. Substance use and related problems were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months. Final assessments were blind to condition. All 13 SOS participants who proceeded to motivational interviewing reported less substance use at 6 months, compared with 58% (7/12) in SC alone. Effects were well maintained to 12 months. However, more SOS participants lived with a relative or partner, and this also was associated with better outcomes. Engagement remained challenging: 39% (16/41) declined participation and 38% (5/13) in SOS only received rapport building. Further research will increase sample size, and address both engagement and potential confounds.

The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings: a systematic review.

Issues. Numerous studies have reported that brief interventions delivered in primary care are effective in reducing excessive drinking. However, much of this work has been criticised for being clinically unrepresentative. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of brief interventions in primary care and determine if outcomes differ between efficacy and effectiveness trials. Approach. A pre-specified search strategy was used to search all relevant electronic databases up to 2006. We also hand-searched the reference lists of key articles and reviews. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving patients in primary care who were not seeking alcohol treatment and who received brief intervention. Two authors independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Random effects meta-analyses, subgroup and sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were conducted. Key Findings. The primary meta-analysis included 22 RCT and evaluated outcomes in over 5800 patients. At 1 year follow up, patients receiving brief intervention had a significant reduction in alcohol consumption compared with controls [mean difference: -38 g week(-1), 95%CI (confidence interval): -54 to -23], although there was substantial heterogeneity between trials (I(2) = 57%). Subgroup analysis confirmed the benefit of brief intervention in men but not in women. Extended intervention was associated with a non-significantly increased reduction in alcohol consumption compared with brief intervention. There was no significant difference in effect sizes for efficacy and effectiveness trials. Conclusions. Brief interventions can reduce alcohol consumption in men, with benefit at a year after intervention, but they are unproven in women for whom there is insufficient research data. Longer counselling has little additional effect over brief intervention. The lack of differences in outcomes between efficacy and effectiveness trials suggests that the current literature is relevant to routine primary care.

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.

Excessive drinking contributes significantly to social problems, physical and psychological illness, injury and death. Hidden effects include increased levels of violence, accidents and suicide. Most alcohol-related harm is caused by excessive drinkers whose consumption exceeds recommended drinking levels, not the drinkers with severe alcohol dependency problems. One way to reduce consumption levels in a community may be to provide a brief intervention in primary care over one to four sessions. This is provided by healthcare workers such as general physicians, nurses or psychologists. In general practice, patients are routinely asked about alcohol consumption during registration, general health checks and as part of health screening (using a questionnaire). They tend not to be seeking help for alcohol problems when presenting. The intervention they are offered includes feedback on alcohol use and harms, identification of high risk situations for drinking and coping strategies, increased motivation and the development of a personal plan to reduce drinking. It takes place within the time-frame of a standard consultation, 5 to 15 minutes for a general physician, longer for a nurse.A total of 29 controlled trials from various countries were identified, in general practice (24 trials) or an emergency setting (five trials). Participants drank an average of 306 grams of alcohol (over 30 standard drinks) per week on entry to the trial. Over 7000 participants with a mean age of 43 years were randomised to receive a brief intervention or a control intervention, including assessment only. After one year or more, people who received the brief intervention drank less alcohol than people in the control group (average difference 38 grams/week, range 23 to 54 grams). For men (some 70% of participants), the benefit of brief intervention was a difference of 57 grams/week, range 25 to 89 grams (six trials). The benefit was not clear for women. The benefits of brief intervention were similar in the normal clinical setting and in research settings with greater resources. Longer counselling had little additional benefit.This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings: A systematic review

Numerous studies have reported that brief interventions delivered in primary care are effective in reducing excessive drinking. However, much of this work has been criticised for being clinically unrepresentative. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of brief interventions in primary care and determine if outcomes differ between efficacy and effectiveness trials. Approach. A pre-specified search strategy was used to search all relevant electronic databases up to 2006. The authors also hand-searched the reference lists of key articles and reviews. They included randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving patients in primary care who were not seeking alcohol treatment and who received brief intervention. Two authors independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Random effects meta-analyses, subgroup and sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were conducted.This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

Efficacy of an adjunctive brief psychodynamic psychotherapy to usual inpatient treatment of depression: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A few recent studies have found indications of the effectiveness of inpatient psychotherapy for depression, usually of an extended duration. However, there is a lack of controlled studies in this area and to date no study of adequate quality on brief psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression during short inpatient stay exists. The present article describes the protocol of a study that will examine the relative efficacy, the cost-effectiveness and the cost-utility of adding an Inpatient Brief Psychodynamic Psychotherapy to pharmacotherapy and treatment-as-usual for inpatients with unipolar depression. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a one-month randomized controlled trial with a two parallel group design and a 12-month naturalistic follow-up. A sample of 130 consecutive adult inpatients with unipolar depression and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score over 18 will be recruited. The study is carried out in the university hospital section for mood disorders in Lausanne, Switzerland. Patients are assessed upon admission, and at 1-, 3- and 12- month follow-ups. Inpatient therapy is a manualized brief intervention, combining the virtues of inpatient setting and of time-limited dynamic therapies (focal orientation, fixed duration, resource-oriented interventions). Treatment-as-usual represents the best level of practice for a minimal treatment condition usually proposed to inpatients. Final analyses will follow an intention-to-treat strategy. Depressive symptomatology is the primary outcome and secondary outcome includes measures of psychiatric symptomatology, psychosocial role functioning, and psychodynamic-emotional functioning. The mediating role of the therapeutic alliance is also examined. Allocation to treatment groups uses a stratified block randomization method with permuted block. To guarantee allocation concealment, randomization is done by an independent researcher. DISCUSSION: Despite the large number of studies on treatment of depression, there is a clear lack of controlled research in inpatient psychotherapy during the acute phase of a major depressive episode. Research on brief therapy is important to take into account current short lengths of stay in psychiatry. The current study has the potential to scientifically inform appropriate inpatient treatment. This study is the first to address the issue of the economic evaluation of inpatient psychotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12612000909820).

Mechanisms of action of brief alcohol interventions remain largely unknown - a narrative review.

A growing body of evidence has shown the efficacy of brief intervention (BI) for hazardous and harmful alcohol use in primary health care settings. Evidence for efficacy in other settings and effectiveness when implemented at larger scale are disappointing. Indeed, BI comprises varying content; exploring BI content and mechanisms of action may be a promising way to enhance efficacy and effectiveness. Medline and PsychInfo, as well as references of retrieved publications were searched for original research or review on active ingredients (components or mechanisms) of face-to-face BIs [and its subtypes, including brief advice and brief motivational interviewing (BMI)] for alcohol. Overall, BI active ingredients have been scarcely investigated, almost only within BMI, and mostly among patients in the emergency room, young adults, and US college students. This body of research has shown that personalized feedback may be an effective component; specific MI techniques showed mixed findings; decisional balance findings tended to suggest a potential detrimental effect; while change plan exercises, advice to reduce or stop drinking, presenting alternative change options, and moderation strategies are promising but need further study. Client change talk is a potential mediator of BMI effects; change in norm perceptions and enhanced discrepancy between current behavior and broader life goals and values have received preliminary support; readiness to change was only partially supported as a mediator; while enhanced awareness of drinking, perceived risks/benefits of alcohol use, alcohol treatment seeking, and self-efficacy were seldom studied and have as yet found no significant support as such. Research is obviously limited and has provided no clear and consistent evidence on the mechanisms of alcohol BI. How BI achieves the effects seen in randomized trials remains mostly unknown and should be investigated to inform the development of more effective interventions.

Evaluation of a pharmacist intervention on patients initiating pharmacological treatment for depression: a randomized controlled superiority trial

Major depression is associated with high burden, disability and costs. Non-adherence limits the effectiveness of antidepressants. Community pharmacists (CP) are in a privileged position to help patients cope with antidepressant treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a CP intervention on primary care patients who had initiated antidepressant treatment. Newly diagnosed primary care patients were randomised to usual care (UC) (92) or pharmacist intervention (87). Patients were followed up at 6 months and evaluated three times (Baseline, and at 3 and 6 months). Outcome measurements included clinical severity of depression (PHQ-9), health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (Euroqol-5D) and satisfaction with pharmacy care. Adherence was continuously registered from the computerised pharmacy records. Non-adherence was defined as refilling less than 80% of doses or having a medication-free gap of more than 1 month. Patients in the intervention group were more likely to remain adherent at 3 and 6 months follow-up but the difference was not statistically significant. Patients in the intervention group showed greater statistically significant improvement in HRQOL compared with UC patients both in the main analysis and PP analyses. No statistically significant differences were observed in clinical symptoms or satisfaction with the pharmacy service. The results of our study indicate that a brief intervention in community pharmacies does not improve depressed patients' adherence or clinical symptoms. This intervention helped patients to improve their HRQOL, which is an overall measure of patient status.

Brief cognitive behavioural therapy for extreme shape concern: an evaluation

Objectives. This study was designed to evaluate a new brief cognitive-behavioural intervention to reduce concerns about body shape. Design. Women with high levels of shape concern (N = 50) were randomly assigned to cognitive behaviour therapy or applied relaxation (AR). Baseline assessments were made and then women received their treatment immediately after this assessment, ('immediate' treatment) or 5 weeks after this assessment, during which time no treatment was given ('delayed' treatment, DT). Methods. Shape concern and related cognitions and emotions were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and at 4 and 12 week follow-up (FU). Results. Immediate treatment was superior to DT in reducing shape concerns, and this difference was maintained at 4 week FU. The cognitive behavioural intervention was more effective than AR in changing shape concern and this difference was largely maintained for 3 months. Conclusions. These initial findings support the further investigation of this brief intervention.

Brief behavioural activation for adolescent depression: working with complexity and risk

Given the long-term negative outcomes associated with depression in adolescence, there is a pressing need to develop brief, evidence based treatments that are accessible to more young people experiencing low mood. Behavioural Activation (BA) is an effective treatment for adult depression, however little research has focused on the use of BA with depressed adolescents, particularly with briefer forms of BA. In this article we outline an adaptation of brief Behavioral Activation Treatment of Depression (BATD) designed for adolescents and delivered in eight sessions (Brief BA). This case example illustrates how a structured, brief intervention was useful for a depressed young person with a number of complicating and risk factors.

The demise of a planned randomised controlled trial in an urban Aboriginal medical service

To fill a gap in knowledge about the effectiveness of brief intervention for hazardous alcohol use among Indigenous Australians, we attempted to implement a randomised controlled trial in an urban Aboriginal Medical Service (AMS) as a joint AMS-university partnership. Because of low numbers of potential participants being screened, the RCT was abandoned in favour of a two-part demonstration project. Only 16 clients were recruited for follow-up in six-months, and the trial was terminated. Clinic, patient, Aboriginal health worker, and GP factors, interacting with study design factors, all contributed to our inability to implement the trial as designed. The key points to emerge from the study are that alcohol misuse is a difficult issue to manage in an Indigenous primary health care setting; RCTs involving inevitably complex study protocols may not be acceptable or sufficiently adaptable to make them viable in busy, Indigenous primary health care settings; and gold-standard RCT-derived evidence for the effectiveness of many public health interventions in Indigenous primary health care settings may never be available, and decisions about appropriate interventions will often have to be based on qualitative assessment of appropriateness and evidence from other populations and other settings.

Prevention of ""Risky"" drinking among students at a Brazilian University

Aim: The aim of this paper was to compare the quantity and frequency of alcohol use and its associated negative consequences between two groups of college students who were identified as being ""risky drinkers."" Subjects were randomly allocated in a clinical trial to intervention or control groups. Methods: Risky drinking use was defined as Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) >= 8 and/or Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI) >= 5 problems in the previous year. Students who had undergone the Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) (N = 145 at baseline; 142 at 12 months, and 103 at 24 months, loss of 29.7%) were compared with a control group (N = 121 at baseline; 121 at 12 months and 113 at 24 months, loss of 9.3%), the nonintervention group. Variables included drinking frequency, quantity and peak consumption, dependence assessment, and family and friends` abuse assessment. Results: Treated students at a 24-month follow-up decreased quantity of alcohol use per occasion and lowered AUDIT and RAPI scores. Conclusions: This is the first brief intervention work on risky drinking with college students in Brazil and the results are encouraging. However, it is difficult to conduct individual prevention strategies in a country where culture fosters heavy drinking through poor public policy on alcohol and lack of law enforcement.

Aconselhamento médico na prevenção da doença e promoção da saúde : análise a propósito do consumo de tabaco

RESUMO - O consumo de tabaco foi responsável por 100 milhões de mortes no século XX. Apesar dos grandes avanços alcançados no controlo deste problema a nível mundial, sob os auspícios da OMS, no contexto da Convenção-Quadro para o Controlo do Tabaco da OMS, se não forem adoptadas medidas consistentes e efectivas de saúde pública, a morbi-mortalidade que lhe está associada continuará a aumentar durante o presente século. A promoção da cessação tabágica constitui a estratégia populacional que permitirá obter ganhos em saúde a mais curto prazo. Embora a larga maioria dos fumadores faça, ao longo da vida, várias tentativas para parar de fumar sem apoio, apenas uma pequena minoria consegue manter-se abstinente a longo prazo. Os médicos de Medicina Geral e Familiar são, de entre todos os profissionais de saúde, os que podem intervir de modo mais consistente e efectivo neste âmbito e que melhores resultados obtêm na cessação tabágica dos pacientes fumadores, dado o vínculo terapêutico e a interacção frequente e continuada que com eles estabelecem ao longo do seu ciclo de vida. O aconselhamento breve, tendo por base a adopção de um estilo de comunicação motivacional centrado no paciente, adaptado aos estádios de mudança comportamental, tem-se revelado efectivo no apoio à mudança de comportamentos relacionados com a saúde e à resolução da ambivalência que caracteriza este processo. A revisão de literatura evidenciou o facto de os médicos nem sempre intervirem nas áreas preventivas e de promoção da saúde, em particular na área da cessação tabágica, com o investimento e a continuidade desejáveis. Por outro lado, muitos pacientes fumadores referem nunca ter sido aconselhados pelo seu médico a deixar de fumar.. Não são conhecidos estudos de âmbito nacional que permitam conhecer esta realidade, bem como os factores associados às melhores práticas de intervenção ou as barreiras sentidas pelos médicos de MGF à actuação nesta área. O presente trabalho teve como objectivos: (i) avaliar a hipótese de que os médicos que disseram adoptar o método clínico centrado no paciente teriam atitudes mais favoráveis relativamente à cessação tabágica e uma maior probabilidade de aconselhar os seus pacientes a parar de fumar; (ii) estudar a relação entre as atitudes, a percepção de auto-eficácia, a expectativa de efectividade e as práticas de aconselhamento sobre cessação tabágica, auto-referidas pelos médicos; (iii) Identificar as variáveis preditivas da adopção de intervenções breves de aconselhamento adaptadas ao estádio de mudança comportamental dos pacientes fumadores; (iv) identificar as barreiras e os incentivos à adopção de boas práticas de aconselhamento nesta área. A população de estudo foi constituída pelo total de médicos de medicina geral e familiar inscritos na Associação Portuguesa de Médicos de Clínica Geral, residentes em Portugal. Para recolha de informação, foi utilizado um questionário de resposta anónima, de autopreenchimento, aplicado por via postal a 2942 médicos, em duas séries de envio. O questionário integrou perguntas fechadas, semifechadas, escalas de tipo Likert e escalas de tipo visual analógico. Para avaliação da adopção do método clínico centrado no paciente, foi usada a Patient Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS). O tratamento estatístico dos dados foi efectuado com o Programa PASW Statistics (ex-SPSS), versão 18. Foram utilizados: o índice de α de Cronbach, diversos testes não paramétricos e a análise de regressão logística binária. Foi obtida uma taxa de resposta de 22,4%. Foram analisadas 639 respostas (67,4% de mulheres e 32,6% de homens). Referiram ser fumadores 23% dos homens e 14% das mulheres. Foi identificada uma grande carência formativa em cessação tabágica, tendo apenas 4% dos médicos afirmado não necessitar de formação nesta área. Responderam necessitar de formação em entrevista motivacional 66%, em prevenção da recaída 59%, de treino numa consulta de apoio intensivo 55%, em intervenção breve 54% e em terapêutica farmacológica 55%. Cerca de 92% dos respondentes consideraram que o aconselhamento para a cessação tabágica é uma tarefa que faz parte das suas atribuições, mas apenas 76% concordaram totalmente com a realização de uma abordagem oportunística deste assunto em todos os contactos com os seus pacientes. Como prática mais frequente, perante um paciente em preparação para parar, 85% dos médicos disseram tomar a iniciativa de aconselhar, 79% avaliar a motivação, 67% avaliar o grau de dependência, 60% marcar o “dia D” e 50% propor terapêutica farmacológica. Apenas 21% assumiram realizar com frequência uma intervenção breve com pacientes em preparação (5 Ás); 13% uma intervenção motivacional com pacientes não motivados para mudar (5 Rs) e 20% uma intervenção segundo os princípios da entrevista motivacional, relativamente a pacientes ambivalentes em relação à mudança. A análise multivariada de regressão logística permitiu concluir que as variáveis com maior influência na decisão de aconselhar os pacientes sobre cessação tabágica foram a percepção de auto-eficácia, o nível de atitudes negativas, a adopção habitual do Programa-tipo de cessação tabágica da DGS, a posse de formação específica nesta área e a não identificação de barreiras ao aconselhamento, em particular organizacionais ou ligadas ao processo de comunicação na consulta. Embora se tenha confirmado a existência de associação entre a adopção do método clínico centrado no paciente e as atitudes face à cessação tabágica, não foi possível confirmar plenamente a associação entre a adopção deste método e as práticas autoreferidas de aconselhamento. Os médicos que manifestaram um nível baixo ou moderado de atitudes negativas, uma percepção elevada de auto-eficácia, que nunca fumaram, que referiram adoptar o Programa-tipo de cessação tabágica e que não identificaram barreiras organizacionais apresentaram uma maior probabilidade de realizar uma intervenção breve (“5 Ás”) de aconselhamento de pacientes fumadores em preparação para parar de fumar. Nunca ter fumado apresentou-se associado a uma probabilidade de realizar uma intervenção breve (“5 Ás”) com frequência, superior à verificada entre os médicos que referiram ser fumadores (Odds-ratio ajustado = 2,6; IC a 95%: 1,1; 5,7). Os médicos com o nível de auto-eficácia no aconselhamento mais elevado apresentaram uma probabilidade superior à encontrada entre os médicos com o menor nível de auto-eficácia de realizar com frequência uma intervenção breve de aconselhamento, integrando as cinco vertentes dos “5 Ás” (Odds ratio ajustado = 2,6; IC a 95%: 1,3; 5,3); de realizar uma intervenção motivacional breve com fumadores renitentes a parar de fumar (Odds ratio ajustado = 3,1; IC a 95%: 1,4; 6,5) ou de realizar com frequência uma intervenção motivacional com pacientes em estádio de ambivalência (Odds ratio = 8,8; IC a 95%: 3,8; 19,9). A falta de tempo, a falta de formação específica e a falta de equipa de apoio foram as barreiras ao aconselhamento mais citadas. Como factores facilitadores de um maior investimento nesta área, cerca de 60% dos médicos referiram a realização de um estágio prático de formação; 57% a possibilidade de dispor do apoio de outros profissionais; cerca de metade a melhoria da sua formação teórica. Cerca de 25% dos médicos investiria mais em cessação tabágica se dispusesse de um incentivo financeiro e 20% se os pacientes demonstrassem maior interesse em discutir o assunto ou existisse uma maior valorização desta área por parte dos colegas e dos órgãos de gestão. As limitações de representatividade da amostra, decorrentes da taxa de resposta obtida, impõem reservas à possibilidade de extrapolação destes resultados para a população de estudo, sendo de admitir que os respondentes possam corresponder aos médicos mais interessados por este tema e que optam por não fumar. Outra importante limitação advém do facto de não ter sido estudada a vertente relativa aos pacientes, no que se refere às suas atitudes, percepções e expectativas quanto à actuação do médico neste campo. Pesem embora estas limitações, os resultados obtidos revelaram uma grande perda de oportunidades de prevenção da doença e de promoção da saúde. Parece ter ficado demonstrada a importante influência que as atitudes, em especial as negativas, e as percepções, em particular a percepção de auto-eficácia, podem exercer sobre as práticas de aconselhamento auto-referidas. Todavia, será necessário aprofundar os resultados agora encontrados com estudos de natureza qualitativa, que permitam compreender melhor, por um lado, as percepções, expectativas e necessidades dos pacientes, por outro, as estratégias de comunicação que deverão ser adoptadas pelo médico, atendendo à complexidade do problema e ao tempo disponível na consulta, tendo em vista aumentar a literacia dos pacientes para uma melhor autogestão da sua saúde. Parece ter ficado igualmente patente a grande carência formativa neste domínio. A adopção do modelo biomédico como paradigma da formação médica pré e pós-graduada, proposto, há precisamente cem anos, por Flexner, tem contribuído para a desvalorização das componentes psicoemocionais e sociais dos fenómenos de saúde e de doença, assim como para criar clivagens entre cuidados curativos e preventivos e entre medicina geral e familiar e saúde pública. Porém, o actual padrão de saúde/doença próprio das sociedades desenvolvidas, caracterizado por “pandemias” de doenças crónicas e incapacitantes, determinadas por factores de natureza sociocultural e comportamental, irá obrigar certamente à revisão daquele paradigma e à necessidade de se (re)adoptarem os grandes princípios Hipocráticos de compreensão dos processos de saúde/doença e do papel da medicina.

Intervenção breve no tabagismo : abordagem clínica dos médicos portugueses

RESUMO - O tabagismo é o principal factor de risco evitável em saúde nos países europeus, contribuindo para o aumento da mortalidade prematura, estando associado a inúmeras doenças. A epidemia tabágica é uma preocupação em Saúde Pública, sendo essencial o investimento na sua prevenção e controlo. A cessação tabágica é uma das estratégias para o controlo desta epidemia, surgindo a intervenção breve como uma comprovada medida custo-efetiva. Contudo, e apesar das guidelines, a intervenção breve não está amplamente disseminada na prática clínica dos profissionais de saúde. Neste sentido, este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar as práticas clíniicas autoreportadas dos médicos portugueses na intervenção breve em tabagismo. É um estudo observacional descritivo transversal e exploratório. A amostra é constituída por médicos que participaram em duas conferências médicas distintas e que aceitaram responder a um questionário (n=549). O tratamento estatístico foi efetuado recorrendo ao Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), versão 21. Foram efetuadas uma análise descritiva e inferencial, assim como uma regressão logística. Analisando os dados, os resultados apontam para a formação pós-graduada e a prática de cessação tabágica como dois fatores que influenciam positivamente a atuação dos médicos na intervenção breve. A intervenção breve é fundamental para aumentar as taxas de cessação tabágica. Para que a implementação seja eficaz é necessário apostar na formação pré e pós-graduada dos médicos e outros profissionais de saúde, associando essa formação ao treino prático que possibilite o desenvolvimento de competências específicas.

Cognitive stimulation for portuguese older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy, comparative duration, feasibility and experiential relevance

Although some studies point to cognitive stimulation as a beneficial therapy for older adults with cognitive impairments, this area of research and practice is still lacking dissemination and is underrepresented in many countries. Moreover, the comparative effects of different intervention durations remain to be established and, besides cognitive effects, pragmatic parameters, such as cost-effectiveness and experiential relevance to participants, are seldom explored. In this work, we present a randomized con- trolled wait-list trial evaluating 2 different intervention durations (standard 1⁄4 17 vs brief 1⁄4 11 sessions) of a cognitive stimulation program developed for older adults with cognitive impairments with or without dementia. 20 participants were randomly assigned to the standard duration intervention program (17 sessions, 1.5 months) or to a wait-list group. At postintervention of the standard intervention group, the wait-list group crossed over to receive the brief intervention program (11 sessions, 1 month). Changes in neuropsychological, functionality, quality of life, and caregiver outcomes were evaluated. Experience during intervention and costs and feasibility were also evaluated. The current cognitive stimulation programs (ie, standard and brief) showed high values of experiential relevance for both intervention durations. High adherence, completion rates, and reasonable costs were found for both formats. Further studies are needed to definitively establish the potential efficacy, optimal duration, cost-effectiveness, and experiential relevance for participants of cognitive intervention approaches.