Fidélité et validité de la mesure clinique du déjettement du tronc auprès d’enfants et d’adolescents présentant une scoliose idiopathique

La mesure du déjettement du tronc est un élément important pour évaluer la posture en ce qui a trait à la scoliose idiopathique. Cependant, il y a peu d'informations quant à sa mesure et les associations entre le déjettement du tronc et d'autres indicateurs ou facteurs pertinents. Les objectifs de cette étude sont : 1) d’évaluer la validité et la fiabilité de test-retest du fil à plomb pour mesurer le déjettement du tronc de C7 à S1 chez les personnes atteintes de scoliose idiopathique; et 2) d'étudier l'association entre le déjettement du tronc et les facteurs suivants : la douleur, l’angle de Cobb, le type de scoliose, la santé mentale et l’image de soi chez les personnes atteintes de scoliose idiopathique. Nous avons recruté 55 sujets âgés de 10 à 21 ans atteints de scoliose idiopathique (angle de Cobb : 15º à 60º) de la clinique de scoliose dans un hôpital pédiatrique de soins tertiaires. Le déjettement a été mesuré directement sur les sujets à deux reprises par la même physiothérapeute de même que sur les radiographies prises ce jour-là. Deux mesures ont été prises à chaque fois : une les pieds joints (FT) et l’autre en écartant les pieds (FA). Les sujets ont répondu au questionnaire adressé au patient de la Scoliosis Research Society-22, qui traite de la douleur, de l'image de soi et de la santé mentale. Le type de scoliose et l'angle de Cobb ont été mesurés sur les radiographies prises ce jour-là. Nous avons utilisé la théorie de la généralisabilité pour calculer la fidélité de test-retest pour les mesures FT et FA, en rapportant les coefficients de fiabilité (f) et les erreurs types de mesure (SEM). La validité de la mesure du fil à plomb a été calculée en comparant les mesures prises directement sur les radiographies en utilisant le coefficient de corrélation de Pearson. Les corrélations de Pearson ont été calculées entre le déjettement du tronc et la douleur, l'angle de Cobb, l'image de soi et la santé mentale. Les corrélations de Spearman ont été calculées entre le déjettement du tronc et le type de scoliose. Nous avons ensuite utilisé des modèles de régression linéaire multiple pour déterminer les associations entre ces variables. Nos résultats indiquent que les mesures de déjettement du tronc en utilisant un fil à plomb ont une forte corrélation (r = 0,87) avec la mesure obtenue par radiographie. La mesure du déjettement du tronc en utilisant un fil à plomb a démontré une excellente fidélité de test-retest (f: 0,98 pour la mesure FT et 0,99 pour la mesure FA) et les SEM étaient de 2,0 mm pour la mesure FT et 1,8 mm pour la mesure FA. Le déjettement du tronc est corrélé positivement avec l'angle de Cobb (r = 0,32, p = 0,02), mais il n'est pas corrélé à la douleur, la santé mentale, l'image de soi ou le type de scoliose. Les conclusions de notre étude ont montré que la mesure clinique du déjettement du tronc en utilisant un fil à plomb est une méthode fiable et valide et que le déjettement du tronc est associé à l'angle de Cobb. Une étude longitudinale est nécessaire pour déterminer si le déjettement du tronc est un indicateur pronostique de la progression de la scoliose. Mots-clés: la scoliose idiopathique, le déjettement du tronc, fil à plomb, posture, déplacement latéral du tronc

Rehabilitación por el ejercicio de la escoliosis idiopática leve

La Sociedad Internacional para el Estudio de la Escoliosis (Scoliosis Research Society) la define como "una curvatura lateral de la columna con rotación de las vértebras dentro de la curva". La escoliosis idiopática es una patología de origen multifactorial que causa una alteración en la postura corporal. La indicación de diferentes técnicas de gimnasia postural ha sido una práctica habitual como parte del tratamiento conservador de la escoliosis idiopática lev (EIL) en niños y adolescentes. Al realizar una búsqueda bibliográfica sobre estudios que traten el tema de la gimnasia correctiva en el tratamiento de la escoliosis idiopática se comprobó que no existe evidencia científica que pruebe que se produzca una reducción de la curva escoliotica con el ejercicio físico. Esto motivo a realizar un trabajo con el objetivo de determinar de qué manera influye en la evolución de la escoliosis, la aplicación de un programa de reeducación postural en una población infantojuvenil, que padece de escoliosis idiopática leve Para este estudio analizarán los resultados de un programa de entrenamiento realizado por un grupo de niños y adolescentes con escoliosis idiopática leve, comparándolos con otro grupo de similares características que no realizo ningún tipo de entrenamiento. Como resultado se evidenciaron efectos positivos que pueden justificar el uso del ejercicio físico como parte del programa de tratamiento de esta patología

Rehabilitación por el ejercicio de la escoliosis idiopática leve

La Sociedad Internacional para el Estudio de la Escoliosis (Scoliosis Research Society) la define como "una curvatura lateral de la columna con rotación de las vértebras dentro de la curva". La escoliosis idiopática es una patología de origen multifactorial que causa una alteración en la postura corporal. La indicación de diferentes técnicas de gimnasia postural ha sido una práctica habitual como parte del tratamiento conservador de la escoliosis idiopática lev (EIL) en niños y adolescentes. Al realizar una búsqueda bibliográfica sobre estudios que traten el tema de la gimnasia correctiva en el tratamiento de la escoliosis idiopática se comprobó que no existe evidencia científica que pruebe que se produzca una reducción de la curva escoliotica con el ejercicio físico. Esto motivo a realizar un trabajo con el objetivo de determinar de qué manera influye en la evolución de la escoliosis, la aplicación de un programa de reeducación postural en una población infantojuvenil, que padece de escoliosis idiopática leve Para este estudio analizarán los resultados de un programa de entrenamiento realizado por un grupo de niños y adolescentes con escoliosis idiopática leve, comparándolos con otro grupo de similares características que no realizo ningún tipo de entrenamiento. Como resultado se evidenciaron efectos positivos que pueden justificar el uso del ejercicio físico como parte del programa de tratamiento de esta patología

Rehabilitación por el ejercicio de la escoliosis idiopática leve

La Sociedad Internacional para el Estudio de la Escoliosis (Scoliosis Research Society) la define como "una curvatura lateral de la columna con rotación de las vértebras dentro de la curva". La escoliosis idiopática es una patología de origen multifactorial que causa una alteración en la postura corporal. La indicación de diferentes técnicas de gimnasia postural ha sido una práctica habitual como parte del tratamiento conservador de la escoliosis idiopática lev (EIL) en niños y adolescentes. Al realizar una búsqueda bibliográfica sobre estudios que traten el tema de la gimnasia correctiva en el tratamiento de la escoliosis idiopática se comprobó que no existe evidencia científica que pruebe que se produzca una reducción de la curva escoliotica con el ejercicio físico. Esto motivo a realizar un trabajo con el objetivo de determinar de qué manera influye en la evolución de la escoliosis, la aplicación de un programa de reeducación postural en una población infantojuvenil, que padece de escoliosis idiopática leve Para este estudio analizarán los resultados de un programa de entrenamiento realizado por un grupo de niños y adolescentes con escoliosis idiopática leve, comparándolos con otro grupo de similares características que no realizo ningún tipo de entrenamiento. Como resultado se evidenciaron efectos positivos que pueden justificar el uso del ejercicio físico como parte del programa de tratamiento de esta patología

The effectiveness of hylan G-F 20 in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an application of two sets of response criteria developed by the OARSI and one set developed by OMERACT-OARSI

Objective: Secondary analyses of a previously conducted 1-year randomized controlled trial were performed to assess the application of responder criteria in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using different sets of responder criteria developed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) (Propositions A and B) for intra-articular drugs and Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT)-OARSI (Proposition D). Methods: Two hundred fifty-five patients with knee OA were randomized to appropriate care with hylan G-F 20 (AC + H) or appropriate care without hylan G-F 20 (AC). A patient was defined as a responder at month 12 based on change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and function (0-100 normalized scale) and patient global assessment of OA in the study knee (at least one-category improvement in very poor, poor, fair, good and very good). All propositions incorporate both minimum relative and absolute changes. Results: Results demonstrated that statistically significant differences in responders between treatment groups, in favor of hylan G-F 20, were detected for Proposition A (AC + H = 53.5%, AC = 25.2%), Proposition B (AC + H = 56.7%, AC = 32.3%) and Proposition D (AC + H = 66.9%, AC = 42.5%). The highest effectiveness in both treatment groups was observed with Proposition D, whereas Proposition A resulted in the lowest effectiveness in both treatment groups. The treatment group differences always exceeded the required 20% minimum clinically important difference between groups established a priori, and were 28.3%, 24.4% and 24.4% for Propositions A, B and D, respectively. Conclusion: This analysis provides evidence for the capacity of OARSI and OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria to detect clinically important statistically detectable differences between treatment groups. (C) 2004 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cordectomía por sustracción pedicular en la columna dorsal y lumbar en fracturas traumáticas: experiencia en el hospital universitario mayor Mederi y revisión sistemática de la literatura

Objetivo: Presentar la experiencia con la técnica de corpectomia por sustracción pedicular en fracturas traumática a nivel de la columna dorsal y Lumbar en el Hospital Universitario Mayor en Bogotá y hacer una revisión sistemática de la literatura de esta técnica quirúrgica. Material y métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de las historias clínicas de pacientes que consultaron al servicio de neurocirugía entre los años 2013 y 2015 con fracturas traumáticas a nivel de la columna dorsal y lumbosacra. Se realizó un análisis de déficit neurológico pre y posoperatorio por medio de la Clasificación neurológica estándar de lesión medular (ASIA), al igual que tiempos de cirugía, sangrado intraoperatorio y complicaciones. A su vez se realiza una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre esta técnica quirúrgica. Resultados: El total de pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía fue de 32, de los cuales el tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 396 min, se obtuvo un ASIA prequirúrgico B: 50% C: 47% y E: 3%. El ASIA post operatorio fue de B: 9% C: 47% D: 38% E: 6%. Se obtuvo una mejoría del déficit neurológico en el 75% los pacientes intervenidos. El promedio de sangrado fue de 1,223 cc. Se tuvieron 4 complicaciones, 2 hematomas en lecho quirúrgico que requirió re intervención y dos fistulas de líquido cefalorraquídeo las cuales se manejaron con vendaje compresivo y reposo absoluto. Conclusiones: La corpectomia por sustracción pedicular requiere de un adecuado entrenamiento y un grupo multidisciplinario dentro de los que se incluye neuroanestesiologo, a su vez de neurocirujanos entrenados en columna. Este abordaje presenta grandes beneficios como disminución de tiempos quirúrgicos, disminución de sangrado intraoperatorio y disminución de morbilidad entre otras.

Evolving a design driven ‘hybrid’ research approach to inform and advance sustainable outcomes in the built environment sector

A significant reduction in global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is a priority, and the preservation of existing building stock presents a significant opportunity to reduce the carbon footprint of our built environment. Within this ‘wicked’ problem context, and moving beyond the ad hoc and incremental performance improvements that have been made to date, collaborative and multidisciplinary efforts are required to find rapid and transformational solutions. Design has emerged as a strategic and redirective practice, and lessons can therefore be learned about transformation and potentially applied in the built environment. The purpose of this paper is to discuss a pragmatic and novel research approach for undertaking such applied design driven research. This paper begins with a discussion of key contributions from design science (rational) and action research (reflective) philosophies in creating an emerging methodological ‘hybrid design approach’. This research approach is then discussed in relation to its application to specific research exploring the processes, methods and lessons from design in heritage building retrofit projects. Drawing on both industry and academic knowledge to ensure relevance and rigour, it is anticipated that the hybrid design approach will be useful for others tackling such complex wicked problems that require context-specific solutions.

Who or what decides how stakeholders are optimally engaged by governance networks delivering public outcomes?

As the problems involving infrastructure delivery have become more complex and contentious, there has been an acknowledgement that these problems cannot be resolved by any one body working alone. This understanding has driven multi-sectoral collaboration and has led to an expansion of the set of actors, including stakeholders, who are now involved in delivery of infrastructure projects and services. However, more needs to be understood about how to include stakeholders in these processes and the optimal ways of developing the requisite combination of stakeholders to achieve effective outcomes. This thesis draws on stakeholder theory and governance network theory to obtain insights into how three networks delivering public outcomes within the Roads Alliance in Queensland engage with stakeholders in the delivery of complex and sensitive infrastructure services and projects. New knowledge about stakeholders will be obtained by testing a model of Stakeholder Salience and Engagement which combines and extends the stakeholder identification and salience theory (Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, 1997), ladder of stakeholder management and engagement (Friedman and Miles, 2006) and the model of stakeholder engagement and moral treatment of stakeholders (Greenwood, 2007). By applying this model, the broad research question: “Who or what decides how stakeholders are optimally engaged by governance networks delivering public outcomes?” will be addressed. The case studies will test a theoretical model of stakeholder salience and engagement which links strategic management decisions about stakeholder salience with the quality and quantity of engagement strategies for engaging different types of stakeholders. The outcomes of this research will contribute to and extend stakeholder theory by showing how stakeholder salience impacts on decisions about the types of engagement processes implemented. Governance network theory will be extended by showing how governance networks interact with stakeholders through the concepts of stakeholder salience and engagement. From a practical perspective this research will provide governance networks with an indication of how to optimise engagement with different types of stakeholders.

Development of patient-specific computer simulation tools for endoscopic scoliosis surgery

Endoscopic approaches for anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis are a relatively new surgical technique. This paper describes the development of patient-specific finite element modelling techniques to investigate the biomechanics of single rod anterior scoliosis correction. Spinal geometry is obtained from pre-operative CT scans and material properties for osteo-ligamentous spinal tissues are based on existing literature. The techniques being developed will allow pre-surgical prediction of stresses, forces and deformations in spinal tissues, rods and screws under post-operative physiological loads.

Inter-sector leader transitions and organisation transformation : a research agenda

Faced with the need for strategic change, structural and cultural realignment, innovation and value-adding, many public sector organisations are tapping into a wider senior leadership talent pool and attracting successful leaders from other sectors (Flynn and Thompson, 2009). Leadership renewal has resulted, in some cases, in the external recruitment of whole senior leadership teams (Hockridge, 2008), raising issues about the influence of context on leader success (Pawar and Eastman, 1997) and potential leader transition failure, a costly outcome for leaders and organisations (Howard, 2001). There is little research on inter-sector leader transitions, which is surprising given the significant costs associated with leader acquisition and failure(Conger, 2010; Day and Halpin, 2004). For example, it is not clear what organizations do (or do not do) to ensure the outcomes of their significant investment in inter sector transitions are realised. In addition, it is not clear how the individual leader manages the challenging transition into a new leadership context and how their approach to leadership facilitates or inhibits successful transition (Avolio, 2010). Leader assimilation programs have been developed to assimilate new leaders (Manderscheid, 2008); however, assimilation is not necessarily a desired organisational outcome (Denis and Pineault, 2000). In this paper we critically review the limited literature on inter-sector leader transitions and transformational change outcomes and argue for a mutual accommodation approach. We draw on our own initial empirical work to propose the elements of a program for achieving this outcome from the perspective of the public organisation and the inter-sector appointee.

Negative change and job outcomes : the impact of subjective fit in public sector health care organization

There is an ongoing level of organizational-wide change (such as empowerment and downsizing) occurring within the Australian health care sector. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence on how public and nonprofit sector nurses cope with these organizational-wide change initiatives and their consequences on individual and work outcomes. This will be the primary aim of the current paper. To this end, a path model is developed base on an integration of existing theoretical perspectives on occupational stress, change management, and person-organizational fit. Data were collected from 252 public and not-for-profit sector nurses. The path analysis suggests that public and nonprofit nurses experience positive and negative change initiatives. Negative change initiatives resulted in an increase in the level of administrative-related stressors. Nurses with more congruent values report less experience with administrative stressors. As nurses experienced more administrative stressors, they tend to report more job dissatisfaction. Nurses whose values were more congruent during organizational change reported higher level of psychological wellbeing. Nurses who were had higher level of psychological wellbeing were found to have higher job satisfaction, which subsequently led to a higher level of organizational commitment.

Observational research and verbal protocol methods

This paper describes observational research and verbal protocols methods, how these methods are applied and integrated within different contexts, and how they complement each other. The first case study focuses on nurses’ interaction during bandaging of patients’ lower legs. To maintain research rigor a triangulation approach was applied that links observations of current procedures, ‘talk-aloud’ protocol during interaction and retrospective protocol. Maps of interactions demonstrated that some nurses bandage more intuitively than others. Nurses who bandage intuitively assemble long sequences of bandaging actions while nurses who bandage less intuitively ‘focus-shift’ in between bandaging actions. Thus different levels of expertise have been identified. The second case study consists of two laboratory experiments. It focuses on analysing and comparing software and product design teams and how they approached a design problem. It is based on the observational and verbal data analysis. The coding scheme applied evolved during the analysis of the activity of each team and is identical for all teams. The structure of knowledge captured from the analysis of the design team maps of interaction is identified. The significance of this work is within its methodological approach. The maps of interaction are instrumental for understanding the activities and interactions of the people observed. By examining the maps of interaction, it is possible to draw conclusions about interactions, structure of knowledge captured and level of expertise. This research approach is transferable to other design domains. Designers will be able to transfer the interaction maps outcomes to systems and services they design.

Research roadmap report : Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions (IDDS)

Changes in the construction sector are creating opportunities in research to maximise the benefits of those changes and to continue the exciting developments in improved people skills, new processes and developing technologies. There are many research centres around the world investigating aspects of the current changes to drive their particular expertise forward. However, the CIB Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions (IDDS) priority research theme takes a higher-level view of the changes and then focuses down on a prioritised set of research targets. These targets have been investigated, re-focussed and validated over a period of four years through many workshops, conferences and meetings by a wide ranging group of representatives from approximately 90 industry and research organisations. This roadmap prioritises and details the research to be performed, why and by whom. In particular, some 25 CIB Working Commissions and Task Groups are explained as having potential roles in the delivery of this research theme. We are extremely privileged to have been urged on by such distinguished construction professionals in their forewords and the case for research. The outcomes of such research, once put into practice should be significantly shortened timespans from conception of need to occupation of new or revised structures. As time is money, the owners will get their investments into productive use sooner, which means a shorter payback time. In addition, there will inevitably be a reduction in construction costs as productivity increases. The improvements in reliable delivery and improved quality currently being seen in relatively simplistic use of Building information Modelling (BIM) (compared to full IDDS) will inevitably continue its on-going trajectory of improvement. We should also consider the wider economic contribution to society that will stem from such improvements and, finally, and by no means unimportantly, the reliable modelling and delivery of sustainability at both the building and estate/ area scale will significantly improve carbon footprints and other sustainable outcomes. Whilst there are huge opportunities for early adopters, the primary risk will be the expansion of the gap between those working in this way and those who are not so advanced or who even refuse to progress1. However, a similar issue arises between industry, clients, educators and trainers; the latter have particular challenges, having existed for many years in a sector that has had relatively few technological changes. However, the opportunities to address the significant and widely varying wastes within the structure of the construction sector and within and across projects are huge and timely. Whilst this Roadmap is specifically targeted at the Standing Commissions and Task Groups of the CIB, it is hoped that there are elements for research and applied research across academia and industry.

The effect of endplate preselection when measuring supine versus standing cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether endplate pre-selection makes a difference to the Cobb Angle change between supine and standing which is known to occur in idiopathic scoliosis. A secondary aim of this study was to identify which (if any) patient characteristics were correlated with supine versus standing Cobb change. The study found that pre-selecting vertebral endplates causes only has a minor effect on supine to standing Cobb change in scoliosis. There is a statistically significant relationship between supine to standing Cobb Angle change and fulcrum flexibility. Therefore, supine to standing Cobb Angle change can be considered as a measure of spinal flexibility when both standing and supine images are clinically available.