Effectiveness of motorist warning devices at rail-highway crossings. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Development and Technology, Washington, D.C.

Safety features of stop signs at rail-highway grade crossings. Volume II. Technical report. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Experimental design for evaluating the safety benefits of railroad advance warning signs. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Railroad grade crossing passive signing study. Interim report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Washington, D.C.

Railroad crossing corridor improvements: a model program based on field reviews in six states. Final report.

Mode of access: Internet.

Standby power for railroad-highway grade crossing warning systems. Final report.

Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Rail Safety Research, Washington, D.C.

Potential means of cost reduction in grade crossing automatic gate systems. Volume I: overview and low cost railroad/highway grade crossing gate systems. Final report.

Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Potential means of cost reduction in grade crossings motorist-warning control equipment. Volume II: comparison of solid state and relay devices and techniques. Final report.

Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Innovative concepts and technology for railroad-highway grade crossing motorist warning systems. Vol. I: overview and concept generation and analysis. Final report.

Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Innovative concepts and technology for railroad-highway grade crossing motorist warning systems. Vol. II: the generation and analysis of alternative concepts. Final report.

Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Safety features of stop signs at rail-highway grade crossings. Volume I. Executive summary. Final report.

Federal Highway Administration, Offices of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Potential means of cost reduction in grade crossings motorist-warning control equipment. Volume I: overview, technology survey and relay alternatives. Final report.

Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass.

Photo enforcement at highway-rail grade crossings : 2001 status report to the General Assembly.

"#546r"--Colophon.

Driver behaviour and decision making at railway level crossings : An exploratory on-road case study

Crashes at rail level crossings represent a significant problem, both in Australia and worldwide. Advances in driving assessment methods, such as the provision of on-road instrumented test vehicles, now provide researchers with the opportunity to further understand driver behaviour at rail level crossings in ways not previously possible. This paper gives an overview of a recent on-road pilot study of driver behaviour at rail level crossings in which 25 participants drove a pre-determined route, incorporating 4 rail level crossings, using MUARC's instrumented On-Road Test Vehicle (ORTeV). Drivers provided verbal commentary whilst driving the route, and a range of other data were collected, including eye fixations, forward, cockpit and driver video, and vehicle data (speed, braking, steering wheel angle, lane tracking etc). Participants also completed a post trial cognitive task analysis interview. Extracts from the wider analyses are used to examine in depth driver behaviour at one of the rail level crossings encountered during the study. The analysis presented, along with the overall analysis undertaken, gives insight into the driver and wider systems factors that shape behaviour at rail level crossings, and highlights the utility of using a multi-method, instrumented vehicle approach for gathering data regarding driver behaviour in different contexts.

Use of ITS to improve level crossings safety : open issues

Level crossing crashes have been shown to result in enormous human and financial cost to society. According to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) [5] a total of 632 Railway Level crossing (RLX) collisions, between trains and road vehicles, occurred in Australia between 2001 and June 2009. The cost of RLX collisions runs into the tens of millions of dollars each year in Australia [6]. In addition, loss of life and injury are commonplace in instances where collisions occur. Based on estimates that 40% of rail related fatalities occur at level crossings [12], it is estimated that 142 deaths between 2001 and June 2009 occurred at RLX. The aim of this paper is to (i) summarise crash patterns in Australia, (ii) review existing international ITS interventions to improve level crossing and (iii) highlights open human factors research related issues. Human factors (e.g., driver error, lapses or violations) have been evidenced as a significant contributing factor in RLX collisions, with drivers of road vehicles particularly responsible for many collisions. Unintentional errors have been found to contribute to 46% of RLX collisions [6] and appear to be far more commonplace than deliberate violations. Humans have been found to be inherently inadequate at using the sensory information available to them to facilitate safe decision-making at RLX and tend to underestimate the speed of approaching large objects due to the non-linear increases in perceived size [6]. Collisions resulting from misjudgements of train approach speed and distance are common [20]. Thus, a fundamental goal for improved RLX safety is the provision of sufficient contextual information to road vehicle drivers to facilitate safe decision-making regarding crossing behaviours.