Patrón génico de fibrosis y apoptosis en nefropatía obstructiva experimental : : modulación por rosuvastatina

La nefropatía obstructiva puede ser un desorden renal complejo de tratar debido al severo cuadro inflamatorio, desbalance oxidativo, apoptosis y fibrosis. Estudios previos sostienen que rosuvastatina (Ros) podría tener utilidad como una opción terapéutica en enfermedades renales que cursarían con apoptosis y fibrosis. Objetivo: Evaluar los posibles efectos antiapoptóticos y antifibróticos de Ros durante la obstrucción ureteral unilateral en ratas neonatas. Materiales y Métodos: Ratas Wistar neonatas de 48 hs. de vida fueron intervenidas quirúrgicamente (grupo experimental) o no (grupo control). Ambos grupos fueron subdivididos en tratadas o no tratadas con Ros (10mg / kg por día) vía oral durante 14 días. Posteriormente se procedió a nefrectomizar y procesar las cortezas renales para determinar por RT-PCR las expresiones de genes: óxido nítrico sintasa inducible (iNOS), factor promotor génico de chaperonas (hsf1), proteína de shock térmico (hsp70), bax, bcL2, wt1, p53, snail, proteína morfogénica del hueso (bmp7), caderina E, factor transformador de crecimiento (tgf-β) y factor de necrosis tumoral (tnf-α). Resultados: La obstrucción ureteral unilateral neonatal indujo una marcada fibrosis y apoptosis, mientras que el tratamiento con Ros moduló el patrón de genes fibróticos y apoptóticos mediante disminución de la expresión de bmp7, caderina E, wt1, p53 y bcl2; además indujo una caída en la expresión de los genes profibróticos y proapoptóticos (bax, tnf-α y tgf-β). El análisis de los resultados presentados, permiten sugerir que la protección renal de rosuvastatina durante nefropatía obstructiva de ratas neonatas estaría asociado a la interacción entre hsp70 y la biodisponibilidad del óxido nítrico con el concomitante descenso en genes pro-apoptóticos.

Paradoxical decrease in HDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 with simvastatin and atorvastatin in a patient with type 2 diabetes

Statins are agents widely used to lower LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. The five statins available in the UK (simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin) differ in many of their pharmacologic properties. In addition to lowering LDL-C, statins also increase HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) moderately. There have been rare reports of significant HDL-C decreases in patients commenced on fibrates and when thiazolidinediones are added to fibrates. This is known as a 'paradoxical HDL-C decrease' as both groups of agents usually increase HDL-C. This phenomenon has never been clearly documented following statin therapy. We now describe a patient with type 2 diabetes who showed this paradoxical fall in HDL-C (baseline HDL-C: 1.8 mmol/L; on simvastatin 40 mg HDL-C 0.6 mmol/L; on atorvastatin 20 mg HDL-C 0.9 mmol/L) with a similar decrease in apolipoprotein A1. No similar decrease was observed with pravastatin and rosuvastatin therapy. This phenomenon appeared to be associated with statin treatment and not a statin/fibrate combination. Our patient clearly demonstrated a paradoxical HDL-C fall with simvastatin and atorvastatin, but not pravastatin or rosuvastatin. Simvastatin and atorvastatin share many pharmacokinetic properties such as lipophilicity while pravastatin and rosuvastatin are relatively hydrophilic and are not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. However, these characteristics do not explain the dramatic reductions in HDL-C observed.

Troponin I and cardiovascular risk prediction in the general population: the BiomarCaRE consortium

AIMS: Our aims were to evaluate the distribution of troponin I concentrations in population cohorts across Europe, to characterize the association with cardiovascular outcomes, to determine the predictive value beyond the variables used in the ESC SCORE, to test a potentially clinically relevant cut-off value, and to evaluate the improved eligibility for statin therapy based on elevated troponin I concentrations retrospectively.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on the Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe (BiomarCaRE) project, we analysed individual level data from 10 prospective population-based studies including 74 738 participants. We investigated the value of adding troponin I levels to conventional risk factors for prediction of cardiovascular disease by calculating measures of discrimination (C-index) and net reclassification improvement (NRI). We further tested the clinical implication of statin therapy based on troponin concentration in 12 956 individuals free of cardiovascular disease in the JUPITER study. Troponin I remained an independent predictor with a hazard ratio of 1.37 for cardiovascular mortality, 1.23 for cardiovascular disease, and 1.24 for total mortality. The addition of troponin I information to a prognostic model for cardiovascular death constructed of ESC SCORE variables increased the C-index discrimination measure by 0.007 and yielded an NRI of 0.048, whereas the addition to prognostic models for cardiovascular disease and total mortality led to lesser C-index discrimination and NRI increment. In individuals above 6 ng/L of troponin I, a concentration near the upper quintile in BiomarCaRE (5.9 ng/L) and JUPITER (5.8 ng/L), rosuvastatin therapy resulted in higher absolute risk reduction compared with individuals <6 ng/L of troponin I, whereas the relative risk reduction was similar.

CONCLUSION: In individuals free of cardiovascular disease, the addition of troponin I to variables of established risk score improves prediction of cardiovascular death and cardiovascular disease.