As assessment of the Competition Commission Report and subsequent outcomes

Following the Office of Fair Trading's review of the British deregulated bus market as a whole in 2009, the issues raised were referred to the Competition Commission. Its final report was published in December 2011. Subsequently, the House of Commons Transport Committee carried out an enquiry into the Commission's report, and reactions to it by the operating industry, user groups, and other bodies, which was published in September 2012. A number of major issues have been raised, including the extent to which price competition may be effective, the appropriate rate of return on capital that would be expected within the industry (and appropriate actions where this is excessive in practice), and industry structure. The importance of competition per se, as distinct from attributes of direct concern to users (such as reliability, frequency, and fares) has also been debated. This paper reviews the issues raised, and outcomes to date, in the light of further evidence on the industry's performance. It is demonstrated similar rates of return could be attained through very different operating strategies, which in turn have very different implications for changes in consumer surplus. The alternative uses made of such profits (for example through reinvestment) may also have markedly different impacts effects on users. Rather than focussing on the dangers of excessive rates of return on capital, the outcomes for service users should be the main issue.

A life cycle framework for governance of Intermodal terminals; planning, operations and strategic management.

This chapter establishes a framework for the governance of intermodal terminals throughout their life cycle, based on the product life cycle. The framework covers the initial planning by the public sector, the public/private split in funding and ownership, the selection of an operator, ensuring fair access to all users, and finally reconcessioning the terminal to a new operator, managing the handover and maintaining the terminal throughout its life cycle. This last point is especially important as industry conditions change and the terminal's role in the transport network comes under threat, either by a lack of demand or by increased demand requiring expansion, redesign and reinvestment. Each stage of the life cycle framework is operationalised based on empirical examples drawn from research by the authors on intermodal terminal planning and funding, the tender process and concession and operation contracts. In future the framework can be applied in additional international contexts to form a basis for transport cost analysis, logistics planning and government policy.

Aproximación al desarrollo de un sistema de transporte masivo a través de la dinámica de sistemas

El porvenir social y económico de una ciudad depende, en gran medida, de la eficiencia de su sistema de transporte; esto se ve reflejado en la capacidad de transportar personas y bienes de una forma sostenible, con los recursos disponibles. En la actualidad se encuentran en desarrollo sistemas de transporte masivo tipo Bus Rapid Transit [BRT] en siete ciudades colombianas, situación que genera la necesidad de dar seguimiento a su progreso y al crecimiento de su participación en la demanda de viajes unipersonales. El siguiente trabajo busca, a través de una simulación en dinámica de sistemas, describir el desarrollo de un sistema de transporte masivo, con el fin de otorgar una visión acerca del impacto de los parámetros operativos y la reinversión en el sistema y en el desarrollo e incremento de su demanda. Se plantean tres escenarios para evaluar diferentes políticas operativas y de reinversión en el sistema, analizando el comportamiento en su desarrollo.

Return on Investment Program FYs 10, 11 and 12 Project Status Report, January 15, 2014

DAS is required to report on projects funded through the Return on Investment Program (ROI). The ROI program has been funded through an appropriation from the Technology Reinvestment Fund. The Technology Reinvestment Fund was created during the 2006 legislative session, and the first appropriations from this fund were for FY 2006-2007. The first report related to that fiscal year and was delivered to the legislature by January 1, 2008. This current report updates projects from fiscal years 10, 11 and 12.

Return on Investment Program FYs 11 and 12 Project Status Report, January 1, 2015

The Office of the Chief Information Officer is required to report on projects funded through the Return on Investment Program (ROI). The ROI program has been funded through an appropriation from the Technology Reinvestment Fund. The Technology Reinvestment Fund was created during the 2006 legislative session, and the first appropriations from this fund were for FY 2006-2007. The first report related to that fiscal year and was delivered to the legislature by January 1, 2008. This current report updates projects from fiscal years 11 and 12.